This is a MUST read!!! Poverty is leaving our children FAR behind. ( )

This book offered a startling view on the state of the American dream and the future of our kids. Ultimately, I enjoyed how much research was provided in this, and that it wasn't all exposition and editorialized. I understand that this is an incredibly intricate issues, however I do think so important pieces were left out, including the sexism rampant in our society. After reading a few reviews and questions asking if there was a "conservative version" of this book, i was worried that this book would be full of opinions with little base other than political affiliation, but it was very matter of fact about the state of affairs and the urgency for action. ( )

Read this book. ( )

Last year I read this author's now-20 year old classic ("Bowling Alone") about waning social ties in America, and this is a related study that goes in quite a different direction. The author and research assistants conducted interviews with teenage/college-age kids and their parents in communities around the country, including his hometown of Port Clinton, Ohio to contrast this generation's prospects for stability in income and employment vs. his own. In short: the barriers are much bigger and more systemic today, ensuring that only the kids from two-parent households with higher than average incomes are guaranteed a good start to their adulthoods. Much like other sociological titles, I would have liked to see a little more in the solutions department, but it was still worthwhile. ( )

Important topic, beautifully researched, dully written. Professor Putnam is such a smart, thoughtful person. I wish he didn't write like we was laying out the contents of a suitcase. He could stand to bring the same fire and passion to his words that I hear from him when he speaks publicly. ( )

Another thought-provoking read by Robert Putnam. ( )

Americans like to believe that anyone, regardless of background, has the opportunity for a fair start in life through education and hard work. This book explores the “opportunity gap” that exists between children of “working- class” parents (defined as those with whose education did not go beyond high school) and children of “upper-middle-class” parents (defined as those who have a degree from a four-year-college). Through a combination of interviews with young adults of different races and (when possible) their parents from five cities across the US and an analysis of data from related quantitative research, Putnam explores this emerging gap. He also examines the factors and policies that likely contributed to the opportunity gap and presents options for improving social mobility. I appreciated the personal stories that were integrated into the discussion of this topic since they put statistics and trends into a more relatable context. It caused me to reflect upon my own childhood and upbringing and to consider how my experiences fit into the trends Putnam described. I also liked the fact that the book is not arguing on behalf of a political party or based on a particular political viewpoint as he explores this complex phenomenon.

Rachel H. / Marathon County Public Library
Find this book in our library catalog.

( )

Hands down one of the best books I've ever read. Putnam combines case studies with data to paint a heartbreaking picture of just how deeply poverty affects our kids. I dare you to read this book and not come away looking at issues in a different light resulting in a renewed sense of purpose. A must read for anybody who cares about the future of our society. ( )

Sobering. Heart breaking. And needs to be read and thoughtfully considered by anyone who cares about educational outcomes and equity in society. ( )

Robert Putnam describes the challenges faced by family and children in American society. The book is dominated by specific case studies, which I found a little tedious to work through. The best parts of the book are the discussions of various social trends that affects families, especially economic factors. The last part of the book offers recommendations for addressing these trends. ( )

Our Kids by Robert Putnam is a powerful book that highlights an ever-worsening problem. However, I feel like the author was merely offering up hard evidence for cultural trends that most of us already intuitively know. The truth is evident for those who are aware of this generational regression. I'll admit that after a while I was skimming through the individual profiles. These were real people supposedly and yet their stories seemed like clichés. Also, did anyone find Putnam's descriptions of life in the 1950's a shade too rosy?

The most interesting takeaway for me—and again, hardly surprising—was that one's childhood surroundings do have a significant effect on growth. I tend to favor the nature argument over the nurture one, but environment does play a role. And a bad environment is not where you want to be. An impoverished child attending public school with other mostly impoverished children is statistically going to do worse, much worse, than a middle class child surrounded by middle class peers. This is also true of a child's life at home. ( )

Putnam's (born 1941) generation grew up in the post-war period and experienced the economic boom and opportunities for upwards social mobility of that era. Their kids, the subjects of this book, have not done as well, however. Drawing mostly on interview material, Putnam tells the stories of many struggling families and how a class divide is growing. That divide is partly economic, but the cultural dimension is just as important, in particular the one having to do with parental behavior. Resourceful parents plan when to have kids, manage to exploit all opportunities, prevent risks, and raise their children to have the right attitudes, while parents with bad parenting styles don't. Residential and social sorting is part of the problem - kids of not-so-great parents get less exposure to other good role-models than before. Putnam is concerned, first on the part of these people themselves, but also on part of democratic governance, as "the opportunity gap undermines political equality and thus democratic legitimacy (p.239)", and "[a]n inert and atomized mass of alienated and estranged citizens, disconnected from social institutions (p. 239)" might give rise to "antidemocratic extremism (p. 239)" when pressured, as in Germany in the 1930s. He stresses that we have not seen the worst yet, as he believes that this type of inequality is still growing, and that we will see that when today's kids become parts of the labor and education statistics. Recommended. ( )

A revealing examination of America's growing inequality gap and its appalling consequences. ( )

Excellent book. All politicians should read it. Social inequality is becoming the norm even for the middle class. ( )

Shattering Insight

America is becoming rigid. It is settling into immobile classes. The classes don’t mix, not in neighborhoods, not in schools, not in marriage and not in work. This is precisely the opposite of the ideals of the nation and the opposite of the way it was just 60 years ago. Usually, it’s hard to see the trends when you’re immersed in them, but this is all pretty clear in the USA in 2015. Putnam explores it through the proxy of his own experience, and intensive (sometimes horrifying) interviews with people in key communities from coast to coast. In his hometown, a rustbelt community, everyone in his generation did far better than their parents. Now, crime, poverty, underemployment, unemployment and minimal prospects for improvement are the rule. This even transcends race as the issue of the day. Blacks divide by class just as whites do. The upper classes live separate, relatively charmed lives of unlimited prospects and opportunities. The rest are lucky to make it through high school to a job of any kind. Upward mobility is all but out of the question.

Putnam examines the family, the community, the school and the support network. He finds unlimited proof that in every case. The upper classes are moving forward with ease, while the lower classes and the poor are trapped in a world of violence, debt, and lack of resources. Even their social networks lack the kinds of weak ties that allow rich kids’ parents to make a phone call for them.

There is all kinds of irony. The principle of scarcity means the more uncertain parents are about income, jobs, and housing, the less attention they can pay to their children. Despite being around more, the stress level and the frustration level mean less parental guidance, more violence and abuse, and of course that violence, being the norm, is carried on by the children. Their experience of life is summed up as “Love gets you hurt; trust gets you killed”. Survival means keeping to yourself. Don’t get involved in anyone else’s business. This is the exact opposite of the 20th century, when neighbors kept watch, and everyone chipped in to help. Today, no good deed goes unpunished is the philosophical backstop of most Americans.

Families no longer provide the boost they did to young minds. Working and poor classes have fewer dinners together, where events and issues get aired. Their children hear far fewer words, and spend less time in after school (or any) activities. While rich kids get more face time, poor kids get more screen time Only 23% of lower class children start school already knowing the alphabet, vs 77% of the better educated classes. This chasm was not a result of a hippie revolution in the 60s. Family breakdown is a result of joblessness and lower expectations beginning in the 80s. Today, the poor and the working poor get married less often. They start families every time they start a new relationship, devoting less time to their children in total. Teen pregnancies are down significantly, but once out in the world, additional out of wedlock children are the norm.

In school, socio-economic status has become more important than test scores in determining who graduates from college. The numbers are stark. Poorer kids participate in fewer after school activities, often because of pay to play, which their parents can’t afford. Marching band is totally out of the question unless you come from wealth. Equal access in school has become quaint history. Lower class parents, having little or no experience with these activities, don’t push their kids into them like soccer moms do. And studies show gigantic gains in income, networks and long term health for those who do participate. Informal mentoring doesn’t exist for the poor kids; their parents have no support network to consult. Disengagement and retreat to social isolation affects the lower classes disproportionately. And disengagement is what the internet society is all about. The book is filled with dozens of ugly charts that all decline or point downward.

The result is a totally different America, dealing with unnecessary poverty, childhood poverty, additional taxpayer burden, Lost competitiveness, lost earnings, lower consumer spending, lower growth, and of course, the dissolution of social cohesion. And near zero economic mobility for most. We are becoming two countries in the style of the kingdoms of old. The classes don’t meet, mix, or trade, despite being just on the other side of the interstate highway.

Putnam points to himself, revealing he could not imagine what life is like for the lower classes, because his generation was mobile and escaped them. Anyone reading this book will also likely be from the more successful class and will similarly have zero experience with the mean world of “the 99%”. It makes for a gripping, shocking, appalling read. There is too much to say about this important book. Read it and it will change you.

David Wineberg ( )