 | United States. Supreme Court, John Chandler Bancroft Davis, Henry Putzel, Henry C. Lind, Frank D. Wagner - 1936 - 792 Seiten
...National Firearms Act. Mr. Harold J. Bandy, with whom Mr. John M. Karns was on the brief, for petitioner. Congress is not empowered to tax for those purposes...which are within the exclusive province of the States. United States v. Butler, 297 US 1, 64; Gibbons v. Ogden, 9 Wheat. 1, 199. Beneficent aims can never... | |
 | 1925 - 924 Seiten
...States. In Imposing taxes for state purposes, they are not doing what Congress is empowered to do. Congress is not empowered to tax for those purposes...taxation, neither Is exercising the power of the other." Mr. Justice Story, in his Commentaries on the Constitution, section 10B8, said: "Thé power of Congress,... | |
 | United States. Agricultural Adjustment Administration - 1936 - 344 Seiten
...an end which is not legitimate, not within the scope of the Constitution, is obviously inadmissible. "Congress is not empowered to tax for those purposes...are within the exclusive province of the States." Gib&orw v. Ogden, 9 Wheat. 1, 199. "There are, indeed, certain virtual limitations, arising from the... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1884 - 1000 Seiten
...judge, that " When each government cases, expressed opinions that the power to reg(*t»te or federal) exercises the power of taxation, neither is exercising the power of the other. Tut when a State proceeds to regulate commerce wiA foreign nations or among the several Stales, it... | |
 | United States. Congress. House. Committee on Education - 1924 - 800 Seiten
...such a position consist with the language of Judge Marshall in Gibbons v. Ogden (9 Wheaton, 198-199): "Congress is not empowered to tax for those purposes...are within the exclusive province of the States." Congress need not, in levying a tax, set forth the purpose for which the tax is intended, but by reason... | |
 | United States. Congress. House. Committee on Ways and Means - 1971 - 216 Seiten
...States. In imposing taxes for State purposes, they are not doing what Congress is empowered to do. Congress is not empowered to tax for those purposes...taxation, neither is exercising the power of the other.' " And further at p. 500 : "With this understanding of the power in virtue of which the two taxes are... | |
 | Martin H. Redish - 1995 - 240 Seiten
...powers: In imposing taxes for State purposes, they are not doing what Congress is empowered to do. Congress is not empowered to tax for those purposes...other. But, when a State proceeds to regulate commerce . . . among the several States, it is exercising the very power that is granted to Congress, and is... | |
 | Christina Duffy Burnett, Burke Marshall - 2001 - 448 Seiten
...Federalism: The Founders' Design ( 1987), chap. 3. 114 See Gibbons v. Ogden, 22 US (9 Wheat.) 1, 199 (1824): "Congress is not empowered to tax for those purposes...are within the exclusive province of the states." As Raoul Berger finds, the recognition of a power to tax in the federal government caused a lot of... | |
| |
Congress is empowered to do. Congress is not empowered to tax for those purposes which are within the exclusive province of the States. 
