...silence of any positive rule, * * * courts of Justice presume tbe tacit adoption of them [foreign laws] by their own government, unless they are repugnant to Its policy or prejudicial to its own Interest" Many other authorities to the same effect might be cited. Trasher v. Everhart, 3 Gill...

...consent of the hitter. And in the absence of any positive rule, affirming, or denying, or retraining the operation of foreign laws, courts of justice presume the tacit adoption of them bj their own government, unless they are repugnant to its policy or prejudicial to its interests. (Conflict...

...adds, "in the silence of any positive rule affirming or denying or restraining the operation of the hreaten, coerce, or attempt to intimidate, threaten,...the right of such other person to vote or to vote (See also 2 Kent Com., p. 457; 18 Peters, 519, 589.) These principles fully establish, that it belongs...

...country; and, in the absence of any positive rule affirming or denying or restraining their operation, courts of justice presume the tacit adoption of them by their own government, unless repugnant to its policy or prejudicial to its interest. Story's Confl. of Laws, 30, 31, 35, 36; Bank...

...étrangères dérivaient dent même à Story, op. cit., p. 35: «ln the silence of any positive rule affirming or denying or restraining the operation...repugnant to its policy or prejudicial to its interests.» V. du reste également des auteurs anglo-saxons d'époque relativement récente. Et précisément:...

...denying, or restraining the operation of foreign laws," Taney had written in 1839, "courts of justice will presume the tacit adoption of them by their own government,...repugnant to its policy, or prejudicial to its interests." The critical importance of Taney's exception is obvious. Presumably, a "positive rule" would have to...

...contrary to its known policy, or prejudicial to its interests. In the silence of any positive rule affirming or denying or restraining the operation...tacit adoption of them by their own government, unless repugnant to its policy, or prejudicial to its interests. It is not the comity of the courts, but the...

...the silence of any positive rule affinning_or denying or restraining the operation of foreign _laws, courts of justice presume the tacit adoption of them by their own government, unless repugnant to its policy, or prejudicial to its interests. It is not the comity of the courts, but the...

...of the United States in the case of Hank v. Earle, 13 Pet. 589: "In the silence of any positive law affirming or denying or restraining the operation...repugnant to its policy or prejudicial to its interests. It is not the comity of the courts, but the comity of nations, [states,] which is administered and...

...prcejitdicio indul gentium fieri potest." And according to Judge Story, in the silence of any positive rule, affirming, or denying, or restraining the operation...repugnant to its policy or prejudicial to its interests : Conflict of Laws, § 38, and see Chief Justice Taney's Opinion in Bank of Augusta v. Earl, 13 Peters'...