 | Tukufu Zuberi - 2001 - 224 Seiten
...Castaneda, a jury discrimination case involving the Texas "key man" system, the Supreme Court ruled that "if the difference between the expected value and the...three standard deviations, then the hypothesis that the jury drawing was random would be suspect to a social scientist." 27 This adoption of formal statistical... | |
 | Ellis B. Murov - 2005 - 388 Seiten
...random clearly was not. The Court, accordingly, held that "as a general rule for such large samples, if the difference between the expected value and the...is greater than two or three standard deviations," the hypothesis that jurors were selected without regard to national origin would be "suspect."9 Or,... | |
 | Brian P. Macfie, Philip M. Nufrio - 2006 - 560 Seiten
...using statistical methods as part of the proceedings. The Court recognized that, as a general rule, if the difference between the expected value and the...is greater than two or three standard deviations, the hypothesis would be suspect to a social scientist. Example 13.3 Since it is generally believed... | |
 | David W. Peterson - 2007 - 226 Seiten
...twenty-nine standard deviations, and, as the Court observed, "as a general rule for such large samples, if the difference between the expected value and the...three standard deviations, then the hypothesis that the jury drawing was random would be suspect to a social scientist." Here the Court takes a further... | |
 | Roman L. Weil, Peter B. Frank, Christian W. Hughes, Michael J. Wagner - 2007 - 1200 Seiten
...as 'a rule of law/" "As a general rule for large samples, if the difference between the expected val and the observed number is greater than two or three standard deviations, the: the hypothesis that the jury drawing was random would be suspect to a social scientist." "It has... | |
 | Steve Ziliak, Deirdre Nansen McCloskey - 2008 - 349 Seiten
...(1977), concerning jury discrimination, the court held that "as a general rule for such large samples, if the difference between the expected value and the...number is greater than two or three standard deviations [that is, if t > 2.0 or 3.0 or p < .05 or .01], then the hypothesis would be suspect to a social scientist,... | |
 | Joseph B. Kadane - 2008 - 472 Seiten
...obtaining a critical ratio of 29. The Court then commented, "as a general rule for such large samples, if the difference between the expected value and the observed number is greater than 2 or 3 standard deviations, then the hypothesis that the jury drawing was random would be suspect to... | |
| |
As a general rule for such large samples, if the difference between the expected value and the observed number is greater than two or three standard deviations, then the hypothesis that the jury drawing was random would be suspect to a social scientist. 
