Abbildungen der Seite
PDF
EPUB

And mountes of Glory rear'd in towering witt-
Alas! but Babell Pride must kiss the pitt.

L'ENUOY.

Powles steeple, and a hugyer thing is downe:
Beware the next Bull-beggar of the towne.

Fata immatura vagantur."

The

Harvey's Newe Letter is dated September 1593, and Marlowe died in the June preceding. The drift of the "goggle-eyed sonet of Gorgon" (as Nashe terms it) and "L'enuoy" plainly is," Marlowe is dead; it remains to muzzle Nashe." The epitaph in the "Postcript" certainly refers to Marlowe, and the meaning of the extraordinary lines "I mus'd awhile," &c., is the same as in the previous sonnet. But what are we to make of the Glosse? only sense to be got out of the lines is that Marlowe had fallen a victim to the plague. We know that the plague was raging at that time in the metropolis. Probably Gabriel Harvey was staying in the country, to be out of the reach of infection,1 when he wrote his Newe Letter. Hearing the report of Marlowe's death he had taken it for granted, when he raised his whoop of exultation, that the poet had died of the plague. We may be sure that, if he had been acquainted at the time with the true account of Marlowe's tragic end, he would have gloated over every detail with ghoul-like ferocity. Though Marlowe took no active part, so far as we know, in supporting Nashe, he seems not to have attempted to

1 His antagonist Nashe had removed to the country in 1592 for safety as we learn from the Private Epistle to the printer prefixed to the first authorised edition of Pierce Penilesse.

:

conceal his contempt for the Harveys. In Have with you to Saffron Walden, Nashe reports a saying of Marlowe's about Gabriel's younger brother, the Rev. Richard Harvey :—" Kit Marloe was wont to say that he was an asse, good for nothing but to preach of the Iron Age." If Marlowe was accustomed to deliver his opinion about the Harveys after that fashion, the doctor's animosity is explicable. In Pierce's Supererogation (p. 62) the vindictive writer exclaimes :-"His [i.e. Nashe's] gayest flourishes are but Gascoigne's weedes or Tarleton's trickes, or Greene's crankes or Marlowe's bravadoes." In the same tract he uses the term "Marloweism " in the sense of "irreverence."

It must be frankly conceded that Marlowe not only abandoned Christianity, but had the reputation of leading a vicious life. In the Returne from Pernassus, an anonymous academical play, printed in 1606, but acted before the death of Queen Elizabeth, while high praise is paid to his genius, regret is expressed for the disorderliness of his life :

"Marlowe was happy in his buskin['d] Muse,—

Alas, unhappy in his life and end!

Pitty it is that wit so ill should dwell,

Wit lent from heaven, but vices sent from hell.
Our theater hath lost, Pluto hath got

A tragick penman for a driery plot."

Among the Harleian MSS. (6853, fol. 520) is a Note1 "contayninge the opinion of one Christofer Marlye,

1 First printed by Ritson in his Observations on Warton's History of English Poetry. The "Note" will be found in an appendix to Vol. III.

concernynge his damnable opinions and judgment of Relygion and scorne of Gods worde." It is a comfort to know that the ruffian who drew up the charges, a certain "Rychard Bame," was hanged1 at Tyburn on 6th December 1594. Doubtless Bame was backed by some person or persons of power and position. It was a deliberate attempt on the part of some fanatics to induce the public authorities to institute a prosecution for blasphemy against the poet. How the charges would have been met it is not easy to say; probably his friends-particularly his patron Sir Thomas Walsingham-would have been powerful enough to avert any serious danger. To a modern reader many of the charges put forward by Bame seem too silly to deserve any serious attention. If Marlowe had been a man of such abandoned principles as his enemies represented, I strongly doubt whether Chapman, who was distinguished for strictness of life, would have cherished his memory with such affection and respect. To my mind the apostrophe to Marlowe in the Third Sestiad of Hero and Leander shows clearly that the two poets were on terms of intimacy, and I fail to understand how Dyce arrived at the opposite conclusion. It is much to be regretted that no copy can now be found of the elegy on Marlowe written by Nashe and prefixed to the Tragedy of Dido, 1594. The elegy was seen by Bishop Tanner, who in his account of Marlowe writes,-"Hanc [sc. Tragedy of Dido] perfecit et edidit Tho. Nashe, Lond. 1594, 4to.—

1 This fact was discovered by Malone from the Stationers' Registers, Book B, p. 316.

Petowius in præfatione ad secundam partem Herois et Leandri multa in Marlovii, commendationem adfert; hoc etiam facit Tho. Nash in Carmine elegiaco tragedia Didonis præfixo in obitum Christoph. Marlovii, ubi quatuor ejus tragoediaram mentionem facit, necnon et alterius De Duce Guisio" (Bibl. Brit., p. 512). Petowe's encomium, to which Tanner refers, runs thus :

66

:

Quicke-sighted spirits,—this suppos'd Apollo,—
Conceit no other but th' admired Marlo;

Marlo admir'd, whose honney-flowing vaine
No English writer can as yet attaine;
Whose name in Fame's immortall treasurie
Truth shall record to endles memorie;
Marlo, late mortall, now fram'd all diuine,
What soule more happy then that soule of thine?
Liue still in heauen thy soule, thy fame on earth!
Thou dead, of Marlos Hero findes a dearth.
Weepe, aged Tellus! all on earth complaine !
Thy chiefe-borne faire hath lost her faire againe :

Her faire in this is lost, that Marlo's want
Inforceth Hero's faire be wonderous scant.

Oh, had that king of poets breathed longer,

Then had faire beautie's fort been much more stronger!

1 Warton, in his Hist. of Eng. Poetry, mentions this elegy of Nashe's, but it is doubtful whether he ever saw it. In Malone's copy of Dido (preserved in the Bodleian) is the following MS. note :-"He [Warton] informed me by letter that a copy of this play was in Osborne's catalogue in the year 1754; that he then saw it in his shop (together with several of Mr. Oldys's books that Osborne had purchased) and that the elegy in question, on Marlowe's untimely death,' was inserted immediately after the title-page; that it mentioned a play of Marlowe's entitled the Duke of Guise and four others, but whether particularly by name he could not recollect. Unluckily he did not purchase this rare piece, and it is now God knows where."

6

2 Old ed. "All earth on earth."

1

His goulden pen had clos'd her so about,

No bastard æglet's quill, the world throughout,
Had been of force to marre what he had made;
For why they were not expert in that trade.
What mortall soule with Marlo might contend,
That could 'gainst reason force him stoope or bend?
Whose siluer-charming toung mou'd such delight,
That men would shun their sleepe in still darke night
To meditate vpon his goulden lynes,

His rare conceyts, and sweet-according rimes.
But Marlo, still-admired Marlo's gon

To liue with beautie in Elyzium;

Immortal beautie, who desires to heare

His sacred poesies, sweete in euery eare:

Marlo must frame to Orpheus' melodie

Himnes all diuine to make heauen harmonie.

There euer liue the prince of poetrie,

Liue with the liuing in eternitie !"

In his preface "To the quick-sighted Reader," Petowe says that his 66 poem was the first fruits of an unripe wit, done at certaine vacant howers." The poem has little merit, but the young writer's admiration for Marlowe is genuine and striking.

Other admirers of Marlowe were not silent. George Peele, in his "Prologue to the Honour of the Garter," written immediately after the poet's death, has these lines :

66

Unhappy in thine end,
Marley, the Muses' darling for thy verse,
Fit to write passions for the souls below,
If any wretched souls in passion speak."

"J. M." in a MS. poem written in 1600 (quoted by Mr. Halliwell-Phillipps in his Life of Shakespeare), speaks with tenderness of "kynde Kit Marloe." In a famous

« ZurückWeiter »