 | New Jersey. Supreme Court - 1921 - 664 Seiten
...applying to count No. 2 apply also to this one. and the question of liability under the contract was one of fact for the jury, and not of law for the court. As to count No. 4. This raises a different question than that in counts 2, 3, 5 and 6. It is a claim... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1816 - 694 Seiten
...the manner of constructing it ; and if there had been any dispute on this subject, it would have been matter of fact for the jury, and not of law for the decision of the Court. The plaintiff, in his specification, after describing his Hopperboy, its structure,... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1822 - 666 Seiten
...the manner of constructing it ; and if there had been any dispute on this subject, it would have been matter of fact for the jury, and not of law for the decision of the Court. The plaintiff, in his specification, after describing his Hopperboy, its structure,... | |
 | 1851 - 670 Seiten
...impeach the finding on another count, however contradictory. R. v. Craddack, 31 — — It is a question of fact for the jury, and not of law for the Court, whether two names are idem tonantia, unless they must necessarily sound the same. R. v. Davit, 207... | |
 | Samuel Niles Sweet - 1843 - 324 Seiten
...them. Others make small and comparatively unimportant words too prominent ; thus , " This is a question of fact for the jury, and not of law for the court, and if the court resume the responsibility of deciding this question, which belongs to the jury and... | |
 | Samuel Niles Sweet - 1846 - 340 Seiten
...them. Others make small and comparatively unimportant words too prominent; thus, " This is a question of fact for the jury, and not of law for the court, and if the court assume the responsibility o/"deciding this question, which belongs to the jury and... | |
 | Edmund Hatch Bennett, Chauncey Smith - 1851 - 680 Seiten
...and the prosecutor in evidence stated that his name was Trius C. : — Held, that it was a question of fact for the jury, and not of law for the court, whether the two words were idem sonanlia. Regina v. Davis, 564. 3. Mistake in Impanelling.] Sce NEW... | |
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1906 - 796 Seiten
...whether the plaintiff was justified in assuming that the car had stopped for her to alight was one of fact for the jury, and not of law for the court. This presents the sole question for determination. The ordinance requires that cars shall be stopped... | |
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1862 - 614 Seiten
...in the line of official duty. (2.) Whether paid into the Treasury of the State or not was a question of fact for the jury, and not of law for the Court ; and the Court erred in regarding it as a question of law alone, and charging upon it as such. 6.... | |
| |
... a question of fact for the jury, and not of law for the court. 
