18, 159, 185, 201, 250 191 210.21- 79 Amicable settlement. (See Treaty of Washington.) Animus: unfriendly, of Great Britain toward the United States established.. Mr. Bernard Montague's views concerning. Archer, the: a tender of the Florida.. Argument of the United States.. prepared by the official counsel of the United States Argument of Great Britain... its nature.. Armed vessels: the dispatch of, from neutral ports illegal their armament from neutral ports defended by Great Britam.. Arins: purchase of, not forbidden by international law, (note)....... Asylum: doctrine of, considered by Mr. Evarts.. Award: character and effect of. Azuni: definition of neutrality. B. Bad faith: in a Government necessary to be proved in order to sustain a charge of Bahama, the: takes the armament to the Alabama.. Bayley, Governor : unfriendly action at Nassau regarding the Florida in 1862.......... not recognized politically; the vessel of, does not enjoy privilege of ex- in case of violation of neutrality by, the remedy is against the vessel. Belligerent power: exercised by United States of right in suppressing insurrection................. in case of rebel hostilities belong to the sovereign of right, to the rebel by conferring them on the rebels by Great Britain was intervention.. Bernard, Mr. Montague, (see Animus :) his views regarding the language of treaties.. Blockade-running: carried on under British flag with toleration of British Government....... thanks the United States in the name of Her Bretanic Majesty for their Bullock, J. D. : insurgent agent, his contracts for vessels in England.......... Burden of proof: after proof of bostile acts on neutral territory, burden on the neutral to thrown upon claimants by the Commission under Jay's Treaty, (1794)...... Mr. Waite's views concerning.. C. Page. 112 154 415 423 513 Cairns, Lord: his views as to the duty of seizing suspected vessels...... Calvo: reference to, concerning neutrality, (note)........... case of, cited.... Canning, Mr.: his views regarding the performance by the United States of their duties as Cases: of the two Governments delivered December 15, 1871... his views regarding the course of Her Majesty's Government..... his opinion regarding the Georgia in 1864..... their establishment in Great Britain defended and justified....... Constitutional disabilities, (see International Law :) 26 203 50 210 220 40 5 55 145 105 .14, 16, 18, 200 187 79 195 99 130 433 513 93, 217 108 176,296 427 448 451 290 23 24 113, 142 266 5 46,48 no answer to a charge of violation of an international duty..... systematically covered by British flag.... a vessel specially adapted for war is regarded, in international law. Counter Case: of the two Governments delivered April 15, 1872, with proofs.. Crimean War: indefensible course of Great Britain during. Cuba, (See Spain:) Cushing, Mr.: his argument in reply to Sir Roundell Palmer.. his observations on the recruitments for the Shenandoah.. 486 534 Mr. Cobden's views regarding... 217 Lord Stanley's views regarding. Mr. Forster's views regarding. Lord Russell's views regarding. a sum in gross should be awarded for. remoteness or nearness of, to be determined by Tribunal. 217 217 217 920 note regarding the assessment of... 248 the principle of compensation for, as maintained by Great Britain. 304 315 Denmark: laws for enforcing neutrality of.... Deposit of the offense: by the Florida at Mobile; argument as to..... Diligence. (See Due Diligence.) Due Diligence. (See Burden of Proof, Great Britain :) not exercised to prevent fitting out, equipping, or arming in its jurisdiction nor to prevent its ports from being used as bases of naval operations.. 66 46 'diligence" implies zeal, application, effort, &c.... due" objections to the British definition... 37 541.546 17 17 17 154 155 implies reasonableness, appropriateness, and adequateness. 155 155 definition of diligence by British and American courts. 156, 157 limit of the obligations created by this requirement of the Treaty. sources of the obligations to observe, according to Sir Roundell Palmer.. of breach of law to be sought from those who give information....... 415 415 includes the power of preventing violations of law. peculiar advantages of Great Britain for the exercise of such power.. of a vessel of war, the privilege is political and discretionary. it is accorded only to vessels of recognized political powers.. the British view regarding.. Sir R. Palmer's view regarding. extent of the right of, (Evarts). 151 132 152 153,455 29.5, 297 427 451 Fenians: F. course of the United States towards justified... Fish, Mr.: 45 his instructions to Mr. Motley of May 15, 1869, and of September 25, 1869. want of due diligence in not inquiring concerning. 63, 64 want of due diligence in not using the powers given by the merchants' ship- arrival at Nassau..... the executive proceedings there a failure of the due diligence required by the seizure of the Florida and subsequent judicial proceedings arming at Green Cay. attempts to elude Spanish laws and fails, and then arrives at Mobile. repairs and coals at Bermuda, July 15, 1863. at Brest, receives recruits and machinery from Liverpool. at Martinique at Bahia.... her tenders, Great Britain liable for their acts. reasons why Great Britain is not responsible for the acts of, as set forth in her armament no negligence on the part of Great Britain: reply of the counsel of the United States to Sir R. Palmer's argument........ Foreign-Enlistment Act, (see Great Britain.) if adopted as the measure of duties, Great Britain still guilty of culpable not the measure of international obligations if defective it should have been amended.. its defects were glaring.... Sir Robert Phillimore's opinion of it. Baron Channell's opinion of it... 73,75 75 76 76 77 77 77 77 78 78 79 273 287 541 446 19, 172 19 19 28 28 28 comparison between it and the United States neutrality law of 1818.. .28, 167, 270 was inefficient and its efficiency diminished by judicial construction.. Course of Great Britain toward, during the American Revolution.... receives coals, supplies, and repairs at Simon's Bay, and goes to Cherbourg reasons why Great Britain is not responsible for the acts of, as set forth in her armament defended by Great Britain 31 166 226 231, 234 236 242, 309 269 273 217 32, 34 49 111 131 104 107 108 108 109 109 110 281 285 Page 394 495 196 193 203, 201 10 12 13,55 13 19 21 27, 163, 165 30,32 .3. 40. 173 45 Government, form of: its influence upon the obligation to observe due diligence; (Palmer,). views as to Johnson Clarendon Convention.. Great Britain, (sce Animus, Due Diligence, Executive Power, Foreign-Enlistment which is the cause of great injury to the United States. the aid from was organized and official the only power which permitted such acts contention in its Case and Counter Case... responsibility for the acts of British subjects failure to use the prerogative power of the Crown. averse to legislating on the subject of neutral duties. her laws compared with those of other powers her history as a neutral compared with that of the United States. her course as a belligerent towards neutrals..... invites a joint action with France in American affairs before insurrection determines to recognize insurgents as belligerents before insurrection other unfriendly proceedings. which established an unfriendly feeling toward the United States.. its Government possessed enough power to carry out any course of action the prerogative of the Crown ample for the purpose.. numerous examples of its exercise during the rebellion. her duty under the law of nations to have seized the insurgent cruizers.. to break up the hostile system... by relying on the Foreign-Enlistment Act by neglecting to amend that act in not detaining offenders, when returning to British ports in not excluding offending cruisers from British ports. in delaying to make representations to insurgent agents... her course regarding Mr. Adams's representations defended. her diligence not affected by the doubtful construction of the Foreign-En- took active and spontaneous measures to acquire information &c. (Pal- Hickley, Commander: inquires the condition of the Florida when leaving Liverpool. Holland: laws for enforcing neutrality of course of Great Britain toward during the American Revolution.... Hospitalities: alleged excessive to insurgents in British ports explained and justified by Hostile acts: acts done in violation of neutrality are, (Evarts).......... Hübner: definition of nentrality.... |