Debating the Democratic Legitimacy of the European UnionBeate Kohler-Koch, Berthold Rittberger Rowman & Littlefield, 2007 - 392 Seiten The discussion about a constitution for the European Union and its rejection by referendum in two of the EU founding member states has once again spurred public and scholarly interest in the democratic quality and potential of the European Union. Debating the Democratic Legitimacy of the European Union brings together distinguished thinkers from law, political science, sociology, and political philosophy to explore the potential for democratically legitimate governance in the European Union. Drawing on different theoretical perspectives and strands from democratic theory, this volume is the first of its kind to overcome the present state of fragmentation in the debate about the conditions and possible remedies for what is often called the "democratic deficit" of the European Union. Among the pressing questions addressed by the contributors are: What future is there for parliamentary democracy in the European Union? Can we observe the evolution of a European public sphere and civil society? Can participatory democracy or deliberative democracy pave the road for a democratically legitimate European Union? Conversations about democracy have engaged the public in a new way since the beginning of the Iraq war, and this volume is the best resource for students and readers who are interested in democracy in the European Union. Contributions by: Rudy B. Andeweg, Katrin Auel, Arthur Benz, Lars-Erik Cederman, Damian Chalmers, Deirdre Curtin, Donatella Della Porta, Klaus Eder, Erik O. Eriksen, Ulrich Haltern, Hubert Heinelt, Doug Imig, Christian Joerges, Beate Kohler-Koch, Christopher Lord, Paul Magnette, Andreas Maurer, Jeremy Richardson, Berthold Rittberger, Rainer Schmalz-Bruns, Michael Th. Greven, Hans-J rg Trenz, and Armin von Bogdandy |
Inhalt
Charting Crowded Territory Debating the Democratic Legitimacy of the European Union | 1 |
A Disputed Idea Becomes Law Remarks on European Democracy as a Legal Principle | 33 |
A Comment on Von Bogdandy | 45 |
Expanding National Parliamentary Control Does It Enhance European Democracy? | 57 |
The European Parliament between PolicyMaking and Control | 75 |
A Comment on Auel Benz and Maurer | 102 |
Constructing Parliamentary Democracy in the European Union How Did It Happen? | 111 |
Parliamentary Representation in a Decentered Polity | 139 |
Participatory Governance and European Democracy | 217 |
Some Considerations on Participation in Participatory Governance | 233 |
A Comment on Heinelt and Greven | 249 |
The Organization of Interests and Democracy in the European Union | 255 |
A Comment on KohlerKoch | 272 |
The EuroPolity in Perspective Some Normative Lessons from Deliberative Democracy | 281 |
A Comment on SchmalzBruns | 304 |
Reconceptualizing the Supremacy of European Law A Plea for a Supranational Conflict of Laws | 311 |
A Comment on Rittberger and Lord | 157 |
Prerequisites of Transnational Democracy and Mechanisms for Sustaining It The Case of the European Union | 165 |
A Comment on Eder and Trenz | 182 |
The Europeanization of Protest A Typology and Empirical Evidence | 189 |
A Comment on Della Porta | 209 |
A Comment on Joerges | 329 |
345 | |
381 | |
About the Contributors | 387 |
Andere Ausgaben - Alle anzeigen
Debating the Democratic Legitimacy of the European Union Beate Kohler-Koch,Berthold Rittberger Eingeschränkte Leseprobe - 2007 |
Häufige Begriffe und Wortgruppen
actors Amsterdam Treaty argue Article Auel Auel and Benz authority Bogdandy citizens civil society codecision procedure collective comitology Commission Committee concept concerns conflict conflict of laws Constitutional Treaty constitutionalization Council debate decision decision-making deliberative democracy deliberative supranationalism demo democratic deficit democratic legitimacy discourse empirical EP's epistemic EU's democratic Euro Europe European integration European law European level European Parliament European political European public European Union forms function governance arrangements groups Habermas Heinelt institutions interests issues Joerges Kohler-Koch legislative Maastricht Maastricht Treaty Maurer mechanisms Member State governments ment MEPs multilevel nation-state national parliaments negotiation neoliberal networks normative organizations parlia parliamentary politics participation participatory democracy participatory governance parties pean percent policy-making political communication problem protest public sphere question reasons reflexive representation representative ropean rules scrutiny social movements sovereignty structure subsidiarity supranational supranationalism theory tion tional tive transnational Trenz voting
Verweise auf dieses Buch
Bürgermeister in Deutschland: Politikwissenschaftliche Studien zu direkt ... Jörg Bogumil,Hubert Heinelt Keine Leseprobe verfügbar - 2005 |
Legitimation globaler Politik durch NGOs: Frauenrechte, Deliberation und ... Barbara Finke Keine Leseprobe verfügbar - 2005 |