Abbildungen der Seite



IT is become too frequent a practice to republish the most valuable works, with such a perfect silence as to former Editions and the Variations from them, or at least with such a slight notice, that the Reader is left in a profound ignorance of many particulars both useful and necessary to be known. This omission may be very well excused in the instances of ordinary trash, with which the press too much abounds; for it would be an intolerable waste of time to descend into minute details about every insignificant production, which happens to gratify the false taste of the times, and runs through a number of editions. But works of genius, of erudition, or of science, and'all which furnish important information or instruction, and are therefore worthy of being preserved from oblivion, ought to be treated in a more formal and respectful manner; and a loose and undistinguishing mode of newly editing such books is not less inconvenient and dissatisfactory to the Reader, than discreditable to the Publisher. Nor should this mark of distinction be confined to original works; compilations and collections, when they relate to very interesting subjects, being also fully intitled to the same attention. This observation strongly applies to a Collection like that of the STATE TRIALS. In the case of a Work so connected with the jurisprudence and history of the country; it is of the utmost consequence to fix the comparative value and authority of the several editions; which cannot be done effectually, without a knowledge of their dates, their principal differences in point of Contents, and the names and characters of the respective editors. With a view therefore to supply that sort of previous information, the want of which may be objected to so many other modern republications, we shall proceed to lay before the Reader the best account we are able to give of the former Editions of the STATE TRIALS, and shall then explain the Plan of the present Edition.

The First Edition of the STATE TRIALS came out in the year 1719, and was comprized in four volumes folio. It began with the Trial of William Thorpe for Heresy in the 8th of Henry the 4th, and ended with that of Dr. Sacheverell in the latter end of queen Anne's reign. The name of the gentleman, who prepared this Edition, is omitted; but in 1720 the same person published an abridgment of the Work with some additional Trials in eight volumes octavo, under the title of Trials for High Treason and other Crimes; and in 1738 he published a "Critical Review of the State Trials," in one volume folio, which, though it includes a kind of abridgement, is quite a different work from the former: and from the title to this last book it appears, that Mr. Salmon was the first editor of the State Trials at large. As we have had occasion to take notice of Mr. Salmon's Critical Review, and some readers may not be apprized of his character as an author, it may be of use to observe, that however indebted to him the public may be for his industry in first forming a Collection of State Trials, and in afterwards abridging them, there is little obligation to him for some of his remarks upon them. In his political principles apparently an inveterate enemy to the Revolution, he is frequently betrayed by an intemperate zeal into a false notion of characters and opinions, and too often disguises both when the demon of party demands a sacrifice. Thus, a work, which, if it had been executed by one with a mind too liberal to be governed by violent prejudices, and at the same time endowed with the requisite knowledge and judgment, would be a source of the most important instruction, by being prostituted to particular views loses great part of its value, and in some measure becomes a vehicle for the poison of misrepresentation. To this censure of Mr. Salmon, candor and justice require us to add, that, notwithstand

[ocr errors]

ing the faults which may be justly imputed to his Critical Review, it is in many respects a very useful work. Considered as a short historical abridgment of the Trials, it is not without a considerable share of merit. Sometimes also he points out the sources, from which various parts of the State Trials are drawn, where the notes to the collection at large are not sufficiently explicit. This kind of information, so very requisite for ascertaining the credit due to each Trial, was such as his situation as first editor of the State Trials must have enabled him to furnish more readily and accurately than almost any other person; and it is to be wished, that he had enlarged further on this head, many explanations being still wanting. Nor should we wholly reject his remarks; for it must be confessed, that those on Trials, which were foreign to the bias of his political tenets, are frequently pertinent, and accompanied with suitable illustrations from the history of the times. Nay, even some of the animadversions, which he makes under the malignant influence of party-spirit, may be deemed not altogether without foundation; and therefore, though it is always necessary to receive them with distrust and caution, yet they ought not to be wholly disregarded, where it is possible to discriminate the shades of truth from the tinge of exaggeration with which they are disguised.

The First Edition of the State Trials was succeeded in the same year by a separate volume, which contained the famous Case of Ship-money, and Harrison's Trial for falsely accusing judge Hutton of High Treason on account of his Opinion against the Crown. In the Preface to the Collection, Mr. Salmon excuses the omission of the former Case by observing, that it was to be found in Rushworth; but many of the Speeches and Arguments are not in his work, and the true reason for the omission appears to have been, that the publishers of the Collection and the proprietors of the Manuscripts from which part of the separate volume was printed, could not agree about the terms.

A Second Edition of the State Trials was published in 1730; and in consequence of the great accession of new matter, the Work became swelled into six volumes folio. The first five volumes comprized the same period as the First Edition, with the exception only of the Proceedings in Parliament against Lord Chief Justice Tresilian and others, in the reign of Richard II. for High Treason, which are a few years earlier in date than the Trial with which the first edition begins. But the differences in other respects were more considerable; for several Trials were transposed in order to render the arrangement more conformable to the due order of time, some additions were made to the Trials in the former Collection, many Trials not contained in that (particularly the Case of Ship-money and Harrison's Trial before mentioned) were interspersed, and the Work was still further augmented by a number of new notes and references. As to the Sixth Volume, it consisted intirely of new matter; being a continuation of the Trials from the death of queen Anne to the end of the reign of George I. with an Appendix of Records relative to the whole Work. Some few other particulars, in which the Second Edition was improved, will be found stated at the end of the very sensible Preface, with which it was introduced to the public. In this Preface, the Editor, after expatiating on the great utility of the State Trials, enters into a consideration of the excellence of our Criminal Law; compares it with the Laws of other European states; and having evinced its superiority by a selection of the most striking instances, he proceeds to point out some of its principal faults and defects; several of which, such as those concerning the peine fort et dure, the summoning of Juries, the use of Latin in our Criminal proceedings, and the Fees of gaolers, have been since corrected by the Legislature, as the intelligent reader will easily recollect. This Preface is much admired, and certainly deserves great commendation, as well in respect of the learning displayed in it, as on account of the spirit and judgment of most of the remarks, which, in general, do equal credit to the author's humanity and understanding. However, the Preface is not wholly without exceptionable passages. It distinguishes the civil from the criminal part of our law, in terms highly disrespectful to the former, and with a degree of prejudice unworthy of so good a writer; for whilst he is studious to expose the faults of the civil branch of the English law, he appears quite forgetful of its excellencies. His treatment of our ecclesiastical courts is of the same kind. He points out some particular abuses of their proceedings, and thence seems to infer a general imperfection in their jurisdiction. But this is an inadequate way of deciding upon the merit of

any system of laws, or of any species of judicature. The most excellent institutions could not stand the test of such a partial view; and should it be applied, it would necessarily lead us to a condemnation of that criminal law, which the learned writer himself so highly and so properly extols. These animadversions on the Preface to the Second Edition of the State Trials do not proceed from the least wish to depreciate the merit of its author, being in truth extorted by the occasion; for had they been suppressed, the generality of praise might be extended by some into a concurrence with opinions, from which in fact we cannot withhold our dissent. To this account of the Second Edition of the State Trials, it should be added, that though no name is prefixed either to the title of the work or the preface, the editor is known to have been Mr. Emlyn, the same gentleman, to whose labours the public is so much obliged, for the care and accuracy with which he edited Sir Matthew Hale's History of the Pleas of the Crown, and for the valuable Notes with which he enriched that great work.

The Second Edition of the State Trials was in 1735 followed with two Supplemental Volumes; to the first of which is prefixed a Preface, fully explaining the reasons of this addition, and the materials of which it is composed. In these two volumes there are many important Cases, particularly the Case of Monopolies between the East India Company and Mr. Sandys in the latter end of the reign of Charles II. in which the chief question was, as to the legality of the Company's patent for an exclusive trade to the East Indies. The period of the two volumes is described in their title pages to be from the reign of Edward VI. to the time in which they are published; but in fact, they do not contain any Trial later than the tenth of George I. and therefore should be considered, not as a continuation of the Collection of Trials in the Second Edition, but merely as supplying its omissions. It was not till two or three years after the coming out of the 7th and 8th volumes, that Mr. Salmon published his Critical Review, on which we have already observed so much; and consequently they fall within the compass of his Remarks. A Second Edition of these two supplemental volumes was reprinted in 1766, but without any alteration.


In 1742 a Third Edition of the State Trials was published in six volumes folio. The Trials and Cases in the supplemental volumes to the Second Edition are not comprized in this Third Edition; nor are we aware of any other difference between the two, than a very small addition of Notes, a new disposition of Sir Richard Spotiswood's, Trial, the Quo Warranto Case, and perhaps a few other Trials, and in the pages.

In 1766 appeared two other volumes of State Trials, being the 9th and 10th. These in point of time principally follow the former Collection, and bring it down to the year 1700; though amongst these Trials there are some of an antecedent period. The first of the two volumes contains a Preface, to which we refer the Reader for a fuller account of their contents.

[ocr errors]

Having finished our account of the former Editions of the State Trials, we shall now exhibit the outline of the plan of the present Edition.

I. The whole Work will consist nominally of eleven, but will be so printed as to be fit for binding in six volumes folio. The first six will be printed exactly from the Third Edition, and the four next from the four supplemental volumes; with no other difference, than that each of the two columns, into which every page of the present Edition will be divided, will comprize one page of the book from which it is printed, and will be numbered accordingly. By this mode of printing the publishers are enabled to consult cheapness, without sacrificing convenience; for in consequence of it, there will be only one half of the number of sheets, which would be otherwise necessary, and two volumes may be commodiously bound in one; and yet the references to the Third will entirely correspond with the present Edition. It is to be wished, that the pages of all the Editions, so far as they respectively go, had been the same; but this attention to convenience having been hitherto neglected, the most eligible course seems to be to follow the Third Edition, that being the last; and all that can now be done to prevent disappointment, when a reference happens not to answer, is to remind the Reader, that books published before 1730, such as the First Edition of Hawkins's Pleas of the Crown, necessarily refer to the First Edition of the State Trials; those published after 1730, such as Hales's History of the Pleas of the Crown, usually refer to the Second Edition; and those published after 1742, such as Sir William Blackstone's Commentaries, to the Third Edition; with which last the present one will intirely agree. As to



the eleventh volume, it is reserved wholly for additional matter; the design being, that one part of it shall be occupied with a continuation of Trials to the present time; and that the other part shall consist of such materials, as shall seem best calculated to supply any omissions in the former part of the Collection. II. In the present Edition, the Preface to the First Edition, which was afterwards omitted, will be restored; together with that to the Case of Ship-money; and the Preface to the Second Edition, as it was re-printed with the name of Mr. Emlyn to it in the third, will be continued, as will also the Prefaces to the supplemental volumes. The history of a publication is best preserved by inserting all the Prefaces in their due order of time; though they are often omitted in modern editions of books, much to the dissatisfaction of nice and accurate readers. III. The two Alphabetical Tables to this Edition, the one of the Persons tried, of the times and places of their Trial, and of their crimes and punishments, and the other of the matter in general, will extend to all the eleven volumes. This will render a search for any thing in the present Edition less tedious and troublesome, than it is in the Second and Third Editions and their supplemental volumes; to which, in consequence of their being published at different times, there are not less than three distinct sets of tables instead of one.

[ocr errors]

From this view of the Plan, on which it is determined to conduct the present Edition, it is evident, that it must have very considerable advantages over the best of the former editions. It will be much less chargeable in the purchase; and yet equally commodious in the form, more various and valuable in the contents.

It only remains for the author of this Preface to add a few lines concerning himself, lest he should be deemed further responsible than he means to be. The undertakers of the Edition requested his assistance in suggesting a plan for the conduct of the Work, and in furnishing a Preface. With this request he hath chearfully complied in the best manner he was able; and the result of his endeavours, he readily submits to the correction of the candid reader. But as to the superintendance, revision, and correction of the Work in the printing, they are unavoidably devolved upon others; the writer of this Preface having avocations, which would not leave him at liberty for such a laborious office, even though he was inclined to undertake it. However, the same desire of promoting an important and useful publication, which induced him to give his aid in its first commencement, will secure to the undertakers his advice in its progress and conclusion.

Inner-Temple, October 5, 1775.




My Preface prefixed to the first Volume of this edition of the STATE-TRIALS Promised, that the present volume should consist wholly of Trials not contained in any former edition; and I was understood to be the person, who would point out what were the materials proper to be adopted. In conformity to this engagement, I used considerable diligence to discover what Trials were omitted in the period of the former editions, and what Trials of importance have occurred since. But the result of my pursuit for new matter proved very inadequate to my expectation; the industry of former collectors having scarce left any deficiencies, which I could supply without too far passing the line I had prescribed to myself of merely selecting additional Trials. Yet the few, which I have gleaned, may suffice to convince the Reader, that I have not been sparing of research.

In the course of my enquiries for new Trials, I resorted to the British Museum, in hopes, that the immense Collection of Manuscripts in that repository of learning and science would supply me with some new materials of importance; and I was particularly encouraged in this expectation by the promising Titles of various Articles in the Catalogue of Harleian Manuscripts. But I was wholly disappointed; for on examination, the few Trials I met with proved, either too meagre and insignificant to be made use of, or nothing more than mere transcripts from some of our old printed Chronicles. And here I take great pleasure in bearing testimony of the exemplary conduct of those Gentlemen, who by their offices have the superintendance of the Manuscripts and printed Books in the British Museum. Though I have had frequent occasion to give several of those gentlemen much trouble; yet I have ever found them uniformly studious to render the access to the valuable Collections entrusted to them easy and agreeable. I have also had the full opportunity of noticing, that their deportment and attentions to others are of the same obliging kind. honourable a discharge of their duty well entitles them to some rewards beyond the small emoluments of their respective offices; and I heartily wish, that they may in future attract a greater share of patronage from the great, than they have hitherto experienced.


There is one very striking and capital defect in the former Editions of this Collection; I mean, in the article of Parliamentary Trials, under which head may be included, not only Trials on Impeachments, but Proceedings on Bills of Attainder, and on Bills inflicting Pains and Penalties. In the ten volumes, which constitute the Work as it was before the present Edition, there are not, as I calculate, thirty articles which fall under such a description. Yet from a very imperfect list, which I formed on a slight examination of the Rolls of Parliament, and various other books of Parliamentary information, I found, that many more than a hundred such Trials might be extracted. It was my wish to have supplied this omission; more especially as by so doing, infinite light would be thrown on a subject most interesting to all Lawyers and Politicians; namely, the Criminal Judicature of Parliament. But such a vast undertaking would not only have far exceeded the limits of my engagements to the Proprietors of this Edition of State Trials, but would also have swelled the present Collection greatly beyond the terms of the Proposals to the Subscribers.

« ZurückWeiter »