The very appropriation of the chattel is equivalent to delivery by the vendor, and the assent of the vendee to take the specific chattel and to pay the price is equivalent to his accepting possession. The effect of the contract, therefore, is to vest... Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of Judicature of ... - Seite 191von Indiana. Supreme Court, Horace E. Carter, Albert Gallatin Porter, Gordon Tanner, Benjamin Harrison, Michael Crawford Kerr, James Buckley Black, Augustus Newton Martin, Francis Marion Dice, John Worth Kern, John Lewis Griffiths, Sidney Romelee Moon, Charles Frederick Remy - 1854Vollansicht - Über dieses Buch
| Great Britain. Court of King's Bench - 1835 - 1218 Seiten
...in the same situation as they would be after a delivery of goods in pursuance of a general contract. The very appropriation of the chattel is equivalent...price, is equivalent to his accepting possession. The effect of the contract, therefore, is to vest the property in the bargainee. The defendant Yates... | |
| Great Britain. Court of Exchequer - 1840 - 554 Seiten
...out of the specific chattel furnished under that contract. In Dixon v. Yates(a), Parke, J., says " The very appropriation of the chattel is equivalent...price, is equivalent to his accepting possession. The effect of the contract, therefore, is to vest the property in the bargainee." Here has been an... | |
| William Selwyn - 1845 - 878 Seiten
...goods in pursuance of a general contract. The very appropriation of the chattel is equivalent to a delivery by the vendor ; and the assent of the vendee...price, is equivalent to his accepting possession. The effect of the contract, therefore, is to vest the property in the bargainee (z). The sale of a... | |
| George Ross - 1855 - 956 Seiten
...the same situation as they would be after a delivery of goods in pursuance of a general contract. The appropriation of the chattel is equivalent to delivery...specific chattel and to pay the price is equivalent to hu accepting possession, 45. 11. To constitute a sale which shall immediately pass the property in... | |
| New York (State). Court of Appeals, Nathan Howard (Jr.) - 1855 - 884 Seiten
...thereby agrees to take them, and to pay the stipulated price, the very appropriation of the chattels is equivalent to delivery by the vendor, and the assent of the vendee to take the specific chattels, and to pay the specific price, is equivalent to his accepting possession. (C kitty on Contracts,... | |
| 1856 - 478 Seiten
...in the same situation as they would be after a delivery of goods in pursuance of a general contract. The very appropriation of the chattel is equivalent...chattel, and to pay the price, is equivalent to his acccepting possession. The effect of the contract, therefore, is, to vest the property in the bargainee.'... | |
| Owen Davies Tudor - 1860 - 934 Seiten
...in the same situation as they would be after a delivery of goods in pursuance of a general contract. The very appropriation of the chattel is equivalent...the price is equivalent to his accepting possession. The effect of the contract therefore, is to vest the property in the bargainee." Dixon v. Yotes, 5... | |
| William Selwyn - 1861 - 874 Seiten
...4 De G. & Sm. 517. (l) That a chose in action (not a deed) (o) Aldridge v. Johnson, 7 E. & B. 885, vendee to take the specific chattel, and to pay the price, is equivalent to his accepting possession (p). The effect of the contract, therefore, is to vest the property in the bargainee" (q). " If goods"... | |
| Georgia. Supreme Court - 1861 - 822 Seiten
...parties, was necessary to transfer the property. The appropriation of the property being equi valent to a delivery by the vendor, and the assent of the vendee to take the specific chattel and pay the price, is equivalent to his accepting possession. The effect of the contract, therefore, is:... | |
| Leone Levi - 1863 - 572 Seiten
...price, the parties are then in the same situation as they would be after the delivery of the goods. The very appropriation of the chattel is equivalent...the price is equivalent to his accepting possession. The effect of the contract, therefore, is to vest the property in the vendee (d). In order, however,... | |
| |