Abbildungen der Seite
PDF
EPUB

SEVENTH SERIES
VOLUME LI.

No. 3492 June 10, 1911

CONTENTS

FROM BEGINNING
VOL. CCLXIX.

1. "When England Awakes." By William Morton Fullerton

[ocr errors]

NATIONAL REVIEW 643

II. Fairies-From Shakespeare to Mr. Yeats. By H. Grierson .

[ocr errors]

DUBLIN REVIEW 651

III. Fancy Farm. Chapters III. and IV. By Neil Munro. (To be con-
tinued).
BLACKWOOD's MagaziNE 659
By H. C. P. NATURE 668

IV. Proposals for the Reform of the Calendar.
V. At the Sign of the Plough. Paper IV. On the Works of Charles

[merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small]

VI. Primavera. By Lieut. Col. D. C. Pedder. CONtemporary REVIEW 672 VII. About “Marie-Claire." By Moira O'Neill.

[merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small]
[ocr errors]

BLACKWOOD'S MAGAZINE

[ocr errors]

678 PUNCH 688 SPECTATOR 691

[merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small]

XII. The International Spy: An Extraordinary Development.

A PAGE OF VERSE

XIII. Music and the Woman-Soul. By Stephen Phillips

[ocr errors][merged small]

WESTMINSTER GAZETTE 642 642

XIV. Beyond the Walls of Peace, By Dollie Radford
XV. The Romany Sway. By Anna Bunston

[merged small][ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors][merged small]

PUBLISHED EVERY SATURDAY BY

THE LIVING AGE COMPANY,

6 BEACON STREET, BOSTON

TERMS OF SUBSCRIPTION

FOR SIX DOLLARS, remitted directly to the Publishers, THE LIVING AGE will be punctually forwarded for a year, free of postage, to any part of the United States. To Canada the postage is 50 cents per annum.

Remittances should be made by bank draft or check, or by post-office or express money order if possible. If neither of these can be procured, the money should be sent in a registered letter. All postmasters are obliged to register letters when requested to do so. Drafts, checks, express and money orders should be made payable to the order of THE LIVING AGE Co.

Single Copies of THE LIVING AGE, 15 cents.

[blocks in formation]

"WHEN ENGLAND AWAKES."

It is important not to misconstrue the European situation in so far as it affects French interests; it is important to see it, for instruction's sake, as it is viewed through French spectacles. These are the words of warning which I ventured to use several weeks ago in commenting upon the recent Cabinet crisis in France. It is the object of the present article to justify this language.

I.

Frenchmen cherished for a decade and more the illusion that the Alliance with Russia was an earnest of the ultimate recovery of Alsace-Lorraine. It took that length of time for them to comprehend that the armies of the Dual Alliance were the armies of the Hague; that neither the Tsar nor their own rulers had contemplated by the Alliance any other aim than that of defence; that the sole positive good which the Alliance was intended to secure was the maintenance of European equilibrium, and that they who had looked to it as a potential instrument of revanche had been tragically duped.

When France realized that the Russian Alliance meant not only that things must be as they had been, but that all hope of better days was gone, the plight of the nation was one that might have given rise to a certain sullen resentment. Such resentment did, in fact, exist to a certain degree among the generations that remembered the war of 1870. Upon the younger generation, on the contrary, the consequence of their slow perception of the real significance, in its European bearings, of the pact with Russia was strangely different. Little by little the notion of révanche faded from the forefront of the French consciousness and gave way to a kind of supine satisfaction with the idea of security implied

in the existence of the Alliance. If the Alliance was to be no longer interpreted as a means of realizing French dreams, it meant, at all events, the inexpressible boon of peace. The French soul tended to become relaxed. Humanitarianism, pacifism, anti-militarism, began to flourish rankly all over French soil. France had been cocardier up to 1890. The Russian Alliance gradually calmed her nerves, dissipated her fears, lulled her to sleep. Strong in her faith in the loyalty of Russia to keep strict watch over the German dogs of war in case they seemed to be preparing to leap across her eastern frontier, France, the Republic, was free to respond, without loss of dignity, or dread of the consequences, to the cajoleries and flatteries of the German Kaiser. If he had continued to cajole instead of blunderingly beginning to menace, humanitarianism might have gangrened the whole of France.

One public man of eminence in France, and one public man alone, President Grévy, had a foreign policy which might have saved his country from some of the psychological consequences and from the positive sequence of events that ensued. President Grévy never tired of preaching the utility of isolation, the danger of entangling alliances. But he was overruled, and successive Ministers in France who extolled the Russian Alliance hoped not merely to assure European equilibrium, but to maintain European peace by holding Germany in check.

They were also aiming indirectly at the great secular rival of their country, Great Britain. Notwithstanding Bismarck's efforts to thwart the inception of the FrancoRussian Alliance, the heirs of his policy found in the Franco-Russian Alliance, one of their most magnificent op

portunities. What the Germans rap-
idly perceived was that in the Dual
Alliance, by the nature of things, Ger-
man hegemony was in being. By that
the
Alliance
traditional bellicose
rizon.
With a splen-
France was paralyzed.
did and almost diabolic ingenuity Ger-
many evolved a scheme for utilizing
the Alliance in her own interest. She
did all in her power to fan the embers
of Anglo-French discord by favoring
French colonial expansion. She was
aware that the first result would be to
pit France against England under
every clime and on every sea; the sec-
ond, that young ambitious Italy would
become the deadly foe of France; and
the third that she herself would ulti-
mately be able to dictate to a divided
Europe the direction of European pol-
icy. For long years German foresight
The dar-
was confirmed to the letter.
ing, diabolic and ingenious plan for
preventing French resiliency was for a
time beautifully successful.

France

and England came into dangerous collision everywhere. Italy and France glared at each other in Tunis and over the Dauphiné passes, while the Triple Alliance was being slowly consolidated. Successive German Chancellors rubbed their hands in glee, and German hegemony assumed the aspect of a pillar of cloud by day and almost of fire by night.

There

But the German plan succeeded too admirably. The Greeks, who were practical psychologists, noted that a Nemesis dogs the steps of a man or nation addicted to the unpardonable sin of ẞpis insolent pride. came a time, amid the multiple shocks which harassed the nerves of British and French Foreign Ministers, as the lines of British and French Colonial expansion dovetailed throughout the world, when the chances of peace or war between France and England Both seemed to hang by a thread. Powers, after Fashoda, awoke to the

idea that they had been playing the
German game; that while they had
been irritating one another by constant
pin-pricks, Germany had been looming
more and more menacingly on the ho-
The scales seemed to drop si-
They
multaneously from their eyes.
saw-with the clearness, ironically pre-
sented, in the fulness of time, by those
superb comic situations staged by the
Zeit Geist-that either they must go
to war for the benefit of Germany or
that they must come to an understand-
ing, in their common interest, to the
discomfiture of a common rival. Fa-
shoda was the fork on their Damascus
road. The revelation which together
they received there flung into the most
dazzling light the whole maliciousness
of the German scheme, of which they
had been for years the blindly uncon-
scious dupes. Such was the beauti-
fully logical birth of that Entente Cor-
diale which shattered as by a thunder-
bolt a German policy which had lasted,
and succeeded, for nearly two decades.

II.

For some months Germany lay stunned and prone. The incredible had happened. There had been long years in the nineties when the Wilhelmstrasse must have known as well as every Parisian that England was even more hated in France than the Power which had dismembered that country in the Galerie des Glaces at Versailles. The possibility that England and France could ever come to terms was not taken in Germany as even a remote contingency. It was regarded as a political absurdity. Yet the incredible had happened. irony of ironies, it had occurred simply as a consequence of the over-weening success of the Bismarckian plan.

And,

After the first discountenancing blow it was not surprising that the German Chancellerie was a long time pulling itself together. Germany's uncouth

movements and gestures in seeking to
wreck the new combination of the En-
tente Cordiale; her futile efforts in
Spain, before the accession of the
young Sovereign, to balk the Mediter-
ranean policy of M. Delcassé, and to
sweep that Power into the orbit of the
Triple Alliance; her invention finally of
the Moroccan Question, as a means of
cleaving in two the Franco-British
block which had only just been
welded; her nervous, violently aggres-
sive manner, so cousue de fil blanc, how-
ever, as the French say,-all these are
facts which are fresh in the memory
not only of the professional politician,
but of the ordinary observer. And the
more Germany wriggled, contrived,
meddled and stormed, the more rooted
became the Entente Cordiale in the
hearts of Frenchmen and of English-
men, the more natural seemed the mi-
racle, the more real the joy of the two
Chancelleries and of the two peoples.
Only a few keen-sighted observers in
either country appeared to realize,
amid the strains of optimistic jubila-.
tion in which England and France wel-
comed the reconciliation and the now
"definitive" establishment of Euro-
pean equilibrium, that Germany, by
the Titanic blunder of her old Bis-
marckian non-colonial policy, had
closed to herself almost every habita-
ble corner of the globe, which she had
complacently handed over to France,
England and Italy; yet that she had de-
veloped a great material civilization,
with instincts of economic and com-
mercial expansion which must find an
outlet or burst. Only a few appeared
to perceive that she was not likely to
accept the new status quo created by
the Triple Entente, and that every
practical device which astute Real
Politik, unshackled by scruple or fanat-
ical idealism, and inspired by patri-
otic national selfishness, could suggest
or invent, would be utilized for the de-
struction of that pact which seemed to

have established the balance of power in Europe.

If it had not been for the issue of the Russo-Japanese War, a result utterly unforeseen by the Quai d'Orsay, and the perilous consequences of which from the point of view of French interests had never been taken into account in France, the French nation might have continued, like the English, to remain, as a whole, blandly ignorant of the strategic conditions and of the international relations on the Continent of Europe. To be sure the Algeciras Conference and the Casablanca incident were yet to intervene as objectlessons for the most indifferent; but the defeat of the Russian ally, Russian paralysis as a military power for some years to come, was an event which, at the time, opened the eyes of even the least discerning of French observers. While it enabled them to divine the causes, perhaps better than they otherwise might have done, of the audacity of Germany in her Moroccan policy, it also enhanced for them the value of the Entente with England, and made them all the more vigilant as to the preservation of that Entente, according to the conception of it cherished by its promoters. British politics, both domestic and foreign, were bound to be watched by Frenchmen with as jealous an eye as their own, and even more carefully and jealously than they watched those of Russia. England had taken the place of Russia in French affections. In the same breath in which Frenchmen repudiated, and sincerely repudiated, the notion that the reason why the Entente was dear to them was because it meant to them a possible revanche, and insisted, and sincerely insisted, on the fact that they longed above all for European peace, they acknowledged that the Entente was possible only because it satisfied the common interest of France and England in thwarting

« ZurückWeiter »