United States Reports: Cases Adjudged in the Supreme Court at ... and Rules Announced at ..., Band 480Banks & Bros., Law Publishers, 1990 |
Im Buch
Ergebnisse 1-5 von 100
Seite 7
... argument , however , ignores the significant possibility that a court of appeals may , in any given case , find a limited justification for imposing penalties in an amount less than 10 % of the lower court's ' Rule 37 of the Federal ...
... argument , however , ignores the significant possibility that a court of appeals may , in any given case , find a limited justification for imposing penalties in an amount less than 10 % of the lower court's ' Rule 37 of the Federal ...
Seite 68
... argument the Court rejected in Jencks . The Government contended in that case that the prerequisite for obtaining access to witnesses ' prior statements should be a showing by the defendant of an inconsistency between those statements ...
... argument the Court rejected in Jencks . The Government contended in that case that the prerequisite for obtaining access to witnesses ' prior statements should be a showing by the defendant of an inconsistency between those statements ...
Seite 74
... argument that the trial court erred in evaluating the constitutionally harmless - error issue would certainly qualify under that provision . Moreover , the Com- monwealth could , if necessary , reassert the constitutional ar- guments ...
... argument that the trial court erred in evaluating the constitutionally harmless - error issue would certainly qualify under that provision . Moreover , the Com- monwealth could , if necessary , reassert the constitutional ar- guments ...
Seite 75
... argument that we should hear this case now because if Ritchie's conviction is reinstated on remand , " the issue of whether defense counsel should have been given access will be moot , " and the Court will lose its chance to pass on ...
... argument that we should hear this case now because if Ritchie's conviction is reinstated on remand , " the issue of whether defense counsel should have been given access will be moot , " and the Court will lose its chance to pass on ...
Seite 83
... argument was made in this Court that any of the exceptions to the warrant requirement applied here . It is clear , therefore , that the po- lice had no authority to cross the threshold of Garrison's apartment and seize evidence ...
... argument was made in this Court that any of the exceptions to the warrant requirement applied here . It is clear , therefore , that the po- lice had no authority to cross the threshold of Garrison's apartment and seize evidence ...
Inhalt
xlvi | |
6 | |
13 | |
21 | |
29 | |
34 | |
52 | |
59 | |
411 | |
423 | |
432 | |
444 | |
451 | |
454 | |
467 | |
488 | |
66 | |
67 | |
71 | |
78 | |
90 | |
92 | |
98 | |
100 | |
111 | |
117 | |
142 | |
145 | |
146 | |
154 | |
160 | |
162 | |
167 | |
170 | |
174 | |
175 | |
187 | |
193 | |
209 | |
210 | |
214 | |
215 | |
217 | |
225 | |
245 | |
253 | |
255 | |
259 | |
264 | |
276 | |
279 | |
284 | |
286 | |
300 | |
308 | |
309 | |
313 | |
330 | |
337 | |
338 | |
351 | |
354 | |
360 | |
371 | |
375 | |
384 | |
390 | |
491 | |
492 | |
498 | |
500 | |
506 | |
508 | |
524 | |
526 | |
527 | |
531 | |
536 | |
543 | |
550 | |
562 | |
566 | |
604 | |
611 | |
612 | |
618 | |
618 | |
618 | |
629 | |
632 | |
640 | |
648 | |
652 | |
665 | |
671 | |
677 | |
681 | |
684 | |
690 | |
707 | |
709 | |
719 | |
726 | |
740 | |
5 | |
8 | |
3 | |
5 | |
7 | |
1 | |
3 | |
Andere Ausgaben - Alle anzeigen
Häufige Begriffe und Wortgruppen
action affirmative affirmative action Agency amici curiae applied argued the cause Asahi Attorney authority BLACKMUN BRENNAN brief California Certiorari denied Cheng Shin claim coal Coastal Commission concurring Confrontation Clause Congress constitutional Corp County Court of Appeals criminal curtilage CZMA decision defendant discrimination dissenting 480 U. S. District Court Due Process Clause employees evidence exclusionary rule federal lands Fifth Amendment filed Fourteenth Amendment Fourth Amendment gambling Granite Rock granted Indian interest issue judgment jurisdiction JUSTICE legislative McWebb ment minimum contacts National Farmers Union O'CONNOR officers Opinion Penn Central Transportation Pennsylvania permit requirement personal jurisdiction petitioner police POWELL pre-empted probable cause promotion protected provides question reasonable regulation remanded remedy respondent respondent's rule SCALIA standard Stat statute statutory STEVENS Subsidence Act Supp supra third floor tion Title VII trade or business trial Tribal Court United violation warrant
Beliebte Passagen
Seite 279 - Individual with a disability means any person who: (i) Has a physical or mental impairment which substantially limits one or more of such person's major life activities; (ii) Has a record of such an impairment; or (iii) Is regarded as having such an impairment.
Seite 380 - In exercising its discretion the court shall consider whether the intervention will unduly delay or prejudice the adjudication of the rights of the original parties.
Seite 355 - We therefore hold that government officials performing discretionary functions generally are shielded from liability for civil damages insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known.
Seite 471 - Government hardly could go on if to some extent values incident to property could not be diminished without paying for every such change in the general law.
Seite 618 - It shall be an unlawful employment practice for an employer (1) to fail or refuse to hire or to discharge any individual, or otherwise to discriminate against any individual with respect to his compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment, because of such individual's race, color, religion, sex, or national origin...
Seite 176 - ... [t]he burden on a school board today is to come forward with a plan that promises realistically to work, and promises realistically to work now.
Seite 5 - ... (b) Determination by court whenever joinder not feasible. If a person as described in subdivision (a) (l)-(2) hereof cannot be made a party, the court shall determine whether in equity and good conscience the action should proceed among the parties before it, or should be dismissed, the absent person being thus regarded as indispensable.
Seite 427 - No Contracting State shall expel or return ("refouler") a refugee in any manner whatsoever to the frontiers of territories where his life or freedom would be threatened on account of his race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group or political opinion.