Summaries of Leading Cases on the ConstitutionFirst published in 1954, Summaries of Leading Cases on the Constitution quickly became the gold standard for concise summaries of important U.S. Supreme Court cases on constitutional law. Covering decisions from the establishment of the Court to the present, the book incorporates every facet of constitutional law, including the powers and privileges of the three branches of the national government, federalism, war powers, and extensive briefs on civil rights and liberties. |
Im Buch
Ergebnisse 1-5 von 6
Seite 21
The Supreme Court upheld the right of the federal government to regulate the
local or intrastate commerce in this case on the theory that it had such a close
and substantial relation to interstate commerce that the satisfactory control of one
...
The Supreme Court upheld the right of the federal government to regulate the
local or intrastate commerce in this case on the theory that it had such a close
and substantial relation to interstate commerce that the satisfactory control of one
...
Seite 22
children could not ship its products in interstate commerce until thirty days after
cessation of the practice. Question—Can Congress exclude from interstate
commerce all goods manufactured by child labor? Decision—No. Reasons—J.
Day ...
children could not ship its products in interstate commerce until thirty days after
cessation of the practice. Question—Can Congress exclude from interstate
commerce all goods manufactured by child labor? Decision—No. Reasons—J.
Day ...
Seite 31
McClung, 379 U.S. 294 (1964), involving a restaurant that purchased much of its
food through interstate commerce. —eoSee— United States v. Lopez, 514 U.S.
549; 115 S. Ct. 1624; 131 L. Ed. 2d 626 (1995) Facts—A twelfth-grade student ...
McClung, 379 U.S. 294 (1964), involving a restaurant that purchased much of its
food through interstate commerce. —eoSee— United States v. Lopez, 514 U.S.
549; 115 S. Ct. 1624; 131 L. Ed. 2d 626 (1995) Facts—A twelfth-grade student ...
Seite 58
This was a combination that would result in the control of interstate and foreign
commerce by this group rather than the only one authorized to do so, the
Congress of the United States. Hence this was an illegal operation, and it had to
be ...
This was a combination that would result in the control of interstate and foreign
commerce by this group rather than the only one authorized to do so, the
Congress of the United States. Hence this was an illegal operation, and it had to
be ...
Seite 63
That power is plenary and may be exerted to protect interstate commerce “no
matter what the source of the dangers which threaten it.' . . . Although activities
may be intrastate in character when separately considered, if they have such a
close ...
That power is plenary and may be exerted to protect interstate commerce “no
matter what the source of the dangers which threaten it.' . . . Although activities
may be intrastate in character when separately considered, if they have such a
close ...
Was andere dazu sagen - Rezension schreiben
Es wurden keine Rezensionen gefunden.
Andere Ausgaben - Alle anzeigen
Summaries of Leading Cases on the Constitution Joseph Francis Menez,John R. Vile Eingeschränkte Leseprobe - 2004 |
Summaries of Leading Cases on the Constitution Joseph Francis Menez,John R. Vile Keine Leseprobe verfügbar - 2004 |
Häufige Begriffe und Wortgruppen
action African American applied argued in dissent Article authority basis Bill of Rights Black Board Brennan California Chief Justice Circuit Court citizens civil claim commerce clause concurring Congress congressional constitutionality contract convicted Court held Court of Appeals criminal decision Decision—Yes denied discrimination due process clause election Eleventh Amendment enforce equal protection clause establishment clause executive exercise Facts—In Facts—The Fifth Amendment Fourteenth Amendment Fourth Amendment freedom Gºe governmental granted guaranteed immunity individual interest interstate commerce involving issue judge judicial jurisdiction jury legislation legislature liberty limited ment national government Note—This O’Connor opinion person police political president prohibited punishment question Question—Does racial ratified Reasons—C.J. Reasons—J regulate Rehnquist religion religious rule Scalia School District Section Senate speech statute Stevens suit Tenth Amendment tion trial U.S. Constitution U.S. District Court U.S. Supreme Court unconstitutional United upheld violation Virginia vote York