Cases not Otherwise Reported. York. March 14, 1892: Dismissed, with costs, on motion of Mr. Solicitor General for plaintiff in error. Mr. Attorney General for plaintiff in error. Mr. Samuel F. Phillips and Mr. A. W. Griswold for defendants in error. No. 247. BEER v. MACKIN. Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Nebraska. April 4, 1892: Judgment affirmed, with costs and interest, by a divided court. Mr. Jefferson Chandler and Mr. John L. Webster for plaintiff in error. Mr. John F. Dillon and Mr. Harry Hubbard for defendant in error. No. 293. BELT v. CUMMING. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of Georgia. April 7, 1892: Dismissed, with costs, pursuant to the 10th rule. Mr. Henry Wise Garnett for appellant. No appearance for appellees. No. 218. BENNETT v. BAKER. Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Illinois. March 10, 1892: Dismissed, with costs, pursuant to the 10th rule. Mr. A. McCoy, Mr. C. B. McCoy and Mr. C. E. Pope for plaintiffs in error. No appearance for defendant in error. No. 351. BERRY v. REILLY. Error to the Supreme Court of the Territory of Arizona. April 27, 1892: Dismissed, with costs, pursuant to the 10th rule. Mr. A. T. Britton and Mr. A. B. Browne for plaintiffs in error. Mr. W. Hallett Phillips and Mr. Joseph K. McCammon for defendant in error. No. 174. BERRY v. WOOD. of the Territory of Montana. Error to the Supreme Court Cases not Otherwise Reported. with costs, pursuant to the 10th rule, and remanded to the Supreme Court of the State of Montana. Mr. T. L. Napton for plaintiff in error. Mr. J. N. Dolph for defendant in error. No. 200. BISCHOFFSHEIM V. BROWN. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. March 1, 1892: Dismissed, per stipulation. Mr. Joseph H. Choate for appellant. Mr. Francis Lynde Stetson for appellees. No. 352. BLACKMORE v. REILLY. Error, to the Supreme Court of the Territory of Arizona. April 27, 1892: Dismissed, with costs, pursuant to the tenth rule. Mr. A. T. Britton and Mr. A. B. Browne for plaintiff in error. Mr. W. Hallett Phillips and Mr. Joseph K. McCammon for defendant in error. No. 131. BLOOMER v. TODD. Appeal from the Supreme Court of the Territory of Washington. December 16, 1891 : Dismissed, with costs, per stipulation of the parties. Mr. A. S. Austin's appearance entered for appellant. No appearance for appellees. No. 101. BRADFORD GAS LIGHT AND HEATING COMPANY V. CITIZEN'S LIGHT AND HEAT COMPANY. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of Pennsylvania. November 16, 1891: Dismissed, with costs, pursuant to the 10th rule. Mr. R. B. Stone for appellant. No appearance for appellee. No. 160. BROOKE V. PENICK. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of West Virginia. January 13, 1892: Dismissed, with costs, pursuant to the 10th rule. Mr. Randolph Coyle for appellant. No appearance for appellees. Cases not Otherwise Reported. No. 274. BRUCE v. VINTON. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Indiana. July 3, 1891 Dismissed, pursuant to the 28th rule. Mr. Ferdinand Winter and Mr. Attorney General for appellants. Mr. Solomon Claypool for appellee. No. 230. BRUMBACK V. BROADBENT. Appeal from the Supreme Court of the Territory of Idaho. July 28, 1891: Dismissed, pursuant to the 28th rule. Mr. S. S. Burdett for appellants. Mr. George Ainslie for appellee. No. 707. CENTRAL TRUST COMPANY OF NEW YORK V. BACON. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Tennessee. May 16, 1892: Dismissed, per stipulation. Mr. Edgar M. Johnson and Mr. W. M. Baxter for appellant. Mr. H. H. Ingersoll and Mr. R. M. Edwards for appellee. No. 1218. CHICAGO, BURLINGTON AND QUINCY RAILROAD COMPANY V. DEY. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of Iowa. March 10, 1892 Dismissed, with costs, on authority of counsel for appellant. Mr. Joseph W. Blythe for appellant. No appearance for appellees. No. 1142. CHICAGO, BURLINGTON AND QUINCY RAILROAD COMPANY V. SMITH. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of Iowa. March 10, 1892: Dismissed, with costs, on authority of counsel for appellant. Mr. Joseph W. Blythe for appellant. No appearance for appellees. No. 1141. CHICAGO, BURLINGTON AND QUINCY RAILROAD COMPANY V. STATE OF IOWA. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of Iowa. March Cases not Otherwise Reported. 10, 1892: Dismissed, with costs, on authority of counsel for appellant. Mr. Joseph W. Blythe for appellant. No appearance for appellee. No. 1147. CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE AND ST. PAUL RAILWAY COMPANY U. SMITH. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of Iowa. March 30, 1892: Dismissed, with costs, on motion of counsel for appellant. Mr. John W. Cary for appellant. No appearance for appellees. No. 1146. CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE AND ST. PAUL RAILWAY COMPANY V. STATE OF IOWA. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of Iowa. March 30, 1892: Dismissed, with costs, on motion of counsel for appellant. Mr. John W. Cary for appellant. No appearance for appellee. No. 1144. CHICAGO AND NORTHWESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. SMITH. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of Iowa. March 10, 1892: Dismissed, with costs, on motion of. Mr. W. C. Goudy for appellant. Mr. W. C. Goudy and Mr. N. M. Hubbard for appellant. No appearance for appellee. No. 1143. CHICAGO AND NORTHWESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. STATE OF IOWA. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of Iowa. March 10, 1892: Dismissed, with costs, on motion of Mr. W. C. Goudy for appellant. Mr. W. C. Goudy and Mr. N. M. Hubbard for appellant. No appearance for appellee. No. 1140. CHICAGO, ROCK ISLAND AND PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY V. SMITH. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of Iowa. April 4, 1892: Dismissed, with costs, on motion of counsel for appellant. Mr. Thomas F. Withrow for appellant. No appearance for appellees. Cases not Otherwise Reported. No. 1139. CHICAGO, ROCK ISLAND AND PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY V. STATE OF IOWA. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of Iowa. April 4, 1892: Dismissed, with costs, on motion of counsel for appellant. Mr. Thomas F. Withrow for appellant. No appearance for appellee. No. 1455. CHICAGO WIRE AND SPRING COMPANY V. AMERICAN WIRE COMPANY. Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Illinois. November 23, 1891 Dismissed, with costs, on motion of Mr. C. W. Needham for plaintiff in error. Mr. M. R. Powers for plaintiff in error. No appearance for defendant in error. No. 268. CHOTEAU V. KANSAS CITY STOCK YARDS COMPANY. Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of Missouri. March 30, 1892: Dismissed, with costs, pursuant to the 10th rule. Mr. A. Comingo for plaintiff in error. Mr. Wallace Pratt and Mr. Frank Hagerman for defendant in error. No. 258. CHURCH V. SWANN. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of Alabama. March 28, 1892: Dismisseu, with costs, pursuant to the 10th rule. Mr. T. A. Hamilton for appellants. Mr. Isaac P. Martin for appellee. No. 359. CITIZENS' STREET RAILWAY COMPANY OF PINE BLUFF, ARKANSAS v. JONES. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Arkansas. March 9, 1892: Dismissed with costs, on motion of counsel for appellant. Mr. Jefferson Chandler and Mr. J. M. Taylor for appellant. No appearance for appellee. No. 340. CITY OF AUGUSTA V. BARD. Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Kansas. April |