Abbildungen der Seite
PDF
EPUB

The Committee on Assessments, to whom was referred the accompanying assessment lists for regulating and grading Fifty-sixth street, from the Fifth avenue to Broadway, respectfully

REPORT:

That your Committee has had the subject under consider. ation and find by the papers submitted to them, that the ordinance directing the improvement to be made, directs it to be done under such directions as shall be given by the Street Commissioner and one of the city surveyors. It appears by the return of the Street Commissioner that he has allowed for inspector's time on the work, four hundred and twenty-four days, at one dollar and fiftycents per day, which makes the sum of six hundred and thirty-six dollars allowed for inspecting, and this sum has been included in the assessment list and assessed upon the property charged with the expense of the improvement.

Your Committee are of opinion that this duty of in. specting should have been performed by the Street Commissioner or the City Surveyor appointed to take charge of the work, as there was nothing for an inspector to do until the work was completed. If it had been otherwise, the ordinance would have provided for the appointment of an inspector, which, in this case, it has not done, and there is no authority vested in the Street Commissioner to appoint inspectors, except when special permission is given by the ordinance directing the work to be done.

The whole expense of the improvement is to be charged upon the owners of the property benefited, and no charge should be allowed unless strictly authorized by law.

Your Committee are satisfied that the charge of six hundred and thirty-six dollars for inspecting, was not only unnecessary, but unauthorized by law.

Your Committee therefore recommend the adoption of the following resolution:

[ocr errors]

Resolved, That this Board non-concur with the Board of Councilmen affirming the assessment in this matter; and that the annexed assessment list for the regulating and grading Fifty-sixth street, from the Fifth avenue to Broadway, be referred back to the assessors to be corrected, by striking out the sum of six hundred and thirty-six dollars so allowed and assessed for inspecting said work, and that the assessment be made accordingly.

RICHARD MOTT, Committee on
ORISON BLUNT, Assessments.

The Committee on Assessments, to whom was recommitted the accompanying assessment list for the regulating and grading Fifty-sixth street, from the Fifth avenue to Broadway, and also the accompanying reports, have reconsidered the matter and respectfully

REPORT:

That from a subsequent examination of the matter your Committee are more strongly impressed that the charge allowed by the assessors for inspecting, and included in the assessment list, was improperly allowed by the assessors, and should be stricken out of the list, as a charge to be assessed upon the property on the line of the improvement.

Your Committee have expressed their reasons for coming to this conclusion in another report, for the regulating and grading Forty-fourth street, from the Eleventh avenue to the Hudson river, and it is, therefore, not necessary to repeat them here, as the principle in the two cases are similar.

[ocr errors]

Your Committee therefore recommend the adoption of the former report and resolution of your Committee in same matter, and which is hereto annexed.

RICHARD MOTT, 1 Committee on
ORISON BLUNT, | Assessments.

« ZurückWeiter »