« ZurückWeiter »
nified a wish to have his pension secured to him for his life; but he neither asked nor received from government any reward whatsoever for his political labours.
On Friday, March 24, I met him at the LITERARY CLUB, where were Mr. Beauclerk, Mr. Langton, Mr. Colman, Dr. Percy, Mr. Vesey, Sir Charles Bunbury, Dr. George Fordyce, Mr. Steevens, and Mr. Charles Fox. Before he came in, we talked of his “ Journey to the Western Islands," and of his coming away, “ willing to believe the second sight,”? which seemed to excite some ridicule. I was then so impressed with the truth of many of the stories of which I had been told, that I avowed my conviction, saying, “ He is only willing to believe: I do believe. The evidence is enough for me, though not for his great mind. What will not fill a quart bottle will fill a pint bottle. filled with belief." “ Are you ? (said Colman,) then cork it up.”
I found his “ Journey” the common topick of conversation in London at this time, wherever I happened to be. At one of Lord Mansfield's formal Sunday evening conversations, strangely called Levées, his Lordship addressed me, “ We have all been reading your travels, Mr. Boswell." I answered, “I was but the humble attendant of Dr. Johnson.” The Chief Justice replied, with that air and manner which none, who ever saw and heard him, can forget, “ He speaks ill of nobody but Ossian."
Johnson was in high spirits this evening at the club, and talked with great animation and success.
He at tacked Swift, as he used to do upon all occasions. " The Tale of a Tub' is so much superiour to his other writings, that one can hardly believe he was the
Johnson's " Journey to the Western Islands of Scotland," edit. 1785, p. 256.
authour of it:& there is in it such a vigour of mind, such a swarm of thoughts, so much of nature, and art, and life.” I wondered to hear him say of · Gulliver's Travels,' “ When once you have thought of big men and little men, it is very easy to do all the rest.” I endeavoured to make a stand for Swift, and tried to rouse those who were much more able to defend him ; but in vain. Johnson at last, of his own accord, allowed very great merit to the inventory of articles found in the pocket of “ the Man Mountain,” particularly the description of his watch, which it was conjectured was his God, as he consulted it upon all occasions. He observed, that “ Swift put his name to but two things, (after he had a name to put,) · The Plan for the Improvement of the English language, and the last · Drapier's Letter.'”
From Swift, there was an easy transition to Mr. Thomas Sheridan.-JOHNSON. “ Sheridan is a won
8 This doubt has been much agitated on both sides, I think without good reason. See Addison's “ Freeholder," May 4, 1714; An Apology for the Tale of a Tub:-Dr. Hawkesworth's Preface to Swift's Works, and Swift's Letter to Tooke the Printer, and Tooke's Answer in that collection :-Sheridan's Life of Swift ;-Mr. Courtenay's note on p. 3 of his “ Poetical Review of the Literary and Moral Character of Dr. Johnson ;” and Mr. Cooksey's “ Essay on the Life and Character of John Lord Somers, Baron of Evesham."
Dr. Johnson here speaks only to the internal evidence. I take leave to differ from him, having a very high estimation of the powers of Dr. Swift. His “ Sentiments of a Church-of-Englandman;" his “ Sermon on the Trinity,” and other serious pieces, prove his learning as well as his acuteness in logick and metaphysicks;" and his various compositions of a different cast exhibit not only wit, humour, and ridicule ; but a knowledge “ of nature, and art, and life ;" a combination, therefore, of those powers, when (as the
Apology” says) “the authour was young, his invention at the height, and his reading fresh in his head," might surely produce “ The Tale of a Tub."
derful admirer of the tragedy of Douglas, and presented its authour with a gold medal. Some years ago, at a coffee-house in Oxford, I called to him, “Mr. Sheridan, Mr. Sheridan, how came you to give a gold medal to Home, for writing that foolish play?' This, you see, was wanton and insolent; but I meant to be wanton and insolent. A medal has no value but as a stamp of merit. And was Sheridan to assume to himself the right of giving that stamp? If Sheridan was magnificent enough to bestow a gold medal as an honorary reward of dramatick excellence, he should have requested one of the Universities to choose the person on whom it should be conferred. Sheridan had no right to give a stamp of merit : it was counterfeiting Apollo's coin." 8 8
On Monday, March 27, I breakfasted with him at Mr. Strahan's. He told us, that he was engaged to go that evening to Mrs. Abington's benefit. visiting some ladies whom I was visiting, and begged that I would come to her benefit. I told her I could not hear: but she insisted so much on my coming, that it would have been brutal to have refused her.” This was a speech quite characteristical. He loved to bring forward his having been in the gay circles of life; and he was, perhaps, a little vain of the solicitations of this elegant and fashionable actress. He told us, the play was to be “ The Hypocrite,” altered from Cibber's “ Nonjuror," so as to satirize the Methodists. “ I do
“ She was
88 [This happened in 1757, and is announced in the London Chronicle of that year, Nov. 26. “ The celebrated Mr. Sheridan, manager of the Theatre Royal at Dublin, hath sent over a gold medal, of the value of ten guineas at least, as a present to the Rev. Mr. Home, author of Douglas, with an inscription, acknowledging his great merit in having enriched the English stage with such an excellent tragedy." A. C.)
not think (said he,) the character of the Hypocrite justly applicable to the Methodists, but it was very applicable to the Nonjurors. I once said to Dr. Madan, a clergyman of Ireland, who was a great Whig, that perhaps a Nonjuror would have been less criminal in taking the oaths imposed by the ruling power, than refusing them ; because refusing them, necessarily laid him under almost an irresistible temptation to be more criminal; for, a man must live, and if he precludes himself from the support furnished by the establishment, will probably be reduced to very wicked shifts to maintain himself.”9 BOSWELL. “ I should think,
9 This was not merely a cursory remark; for in his Life of Fenton
“ With many other wise and virtuous men, who at that time of discord and debate about the beginning of this century,] consulted conscience well or ill formed, more than interest, he doubted the legality of the government; and refusing to qualify himself for publick employment, by taking the oaths required, left the University without a degree." This conduct Johnson calls
perverseness of integrity."
The question concerning the morality of taking oaths, of whatever kind, imposed by the prevailing power at the time, rather than to be excluded from all consequence, or even any considerable usefulness in society, has been agitated with all the acuteness of casuistry. It is related, that he who devised the oath of abjuration, profigately boasted, that he had framed a test which should “ damn one half of the nation, and starve the other."
Upon minds not exalted to inflexible rectitude, or minds in which zeal for a party is predominant to excess, taking that oath against conviction, may have been palliated under the plea of necessity, or ventured upon in heat, as upon the whole producing more good than evil.
At a county election in Scotland, many years ago, when there was a warm contest between the friends of the Hanoverian succession, and those against it, the oath of abjuration having been demanded, the freeholders upon one side rose to go away. Upon which a very sanguine gentleman, one of their number, ran to the door to stop them, calling out with much earnestness, Stay, stay, my friends, and let us swear the rogues out of it!”
6 I am
Sir, that a man who took the oaths contrary to his principles, was a determined wicked man, because he was sure he was committing perjury, whereas a Nonjuror might be insensibly led to do what was wrong, without being so directly conscious of it.” JOHNSON. “ Why, Sir, a man who goes to bed to his patron's wife is pretty sure that he is committing wickedness.” Boswell. “ Did the nonjuring clergymen do so, Sir ? ” afraid many of them did.”
I was startled at this argument, and could by no means think it convincing. Had not his own father complied with the requisition of government, (as to which he once observed to me, when I pressed him upon it, “ That, Sir, he was to settle with himself,") he would probably have thought more unfavourably of a Jacobite who took the oaths :
-had he not resembled My father as he swore. Mr. Strahan talked of launching into the great ocean of London, in order to have a chance for rising into eminence; and, observing that many men were kept back from trying their fortunes there, because they were born to a competency, said, “ Small certainties are the bane of men of talents; " which Johnson confirmed. Mr. Strahan put Johnson in mind of a remark which he had made to him ; “ There are few ways in which a man can be more innocently employed than in getting money." “ The more one thinks of this, (said Strahan,) the juster it will appear.”
Mr. Strahan had taken a poor boy from the country as an apprentice, upon Johnson's recommendation. Johnson having enquired after him, said, “ Mr. Strahan, let me have five guineas on account, and I'll give this boy one. Nay, if a man recommends a boy, and does nothing for him, it is sad work. Call him down.”