United States Reports: ... and Rules Announced at ...Banks & Bros., Law Publishers, 1894 |
Im Buch
Ergebnisse 1-5 von 100
Seite 1
... ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON . No. 787. Submitted December 2 , 1892. — Decided March 5 , 1894 . This court has jurisdiction to review by writ of error a judgment of the highest court of the State of Oregon ...
... ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON . No. 787. Submitted December 2 , 1892. — Decided March 5 , 1894 . This court has jurisdiction to review by writ of error a judgment of the highest court of the State of Oregon ...
Seite 8
... error , and assigned the following errors : " First . The Supreme Court of Oregon decided that a grantee of the United States , under the act of Congress of September 27 , 1850 , known as the Oregon Donation Land Law , of land bounded ...
... error , and assigned the following errors : " First . The Supreme Court of Oregon decided that a grantee of the United States , under the act of Congress of September 27 , 1850 , known as the Oregon Donation Land Law , of land bounded ...
Seite 9
... error , claiming under the United States , and the plaintiffs below , now defendants in error , claiming under the State of Oregon ; and is in sub- stance this James M. Shively , being the owner , by title obtained by him from the ...
... error , claiming under the United States , and the plaintiffs below , now defendants in error , claiming under the State of Oregon ; and is in sub- stance this James M. Shively , being the owner , by title obtained by him from the ...
Seite 10
... error was dismissed for want of jurisdiction , it did not appear that the plaintiff in error claimed under a grant from the United States . 146 U. S. 646 , 653 , 654 . The present case being clearly within our jurisdiction , we proceed ...
... error was dismissed for want of jurisdiction , it did not appear that the plaintiff in error claimed under a grant from the United States . 146 U. S. 646 , 653 , 654 . The present case being clearly within our jurisdiction , we proceed ...
Seite 53
... error nor his grantor appears to have ever built a wharf or made any other improvement upon the lands in controversy , or to have applied to the State to pur- chase them . But the defendants in error , after their purchase from the ...
... error nor his grantor appears to have ever built a wharf or made any other improvement upon the lands in controversy , or to have applied to the State to pur- chase them . But the defendants in error , after their purchase from the ...
Andere Ausgaben - Alle anzeigen
Häufige Begriffe und Wortgruppen
acres act of Congress action affirmed alleged appeal Applegate Arkansas Arkansas Midland Railroad Attorney authority Bank bill bonds cars charter Circuit Court claim Columbia River Commencement Bay commerce common law complainant Constitution construction contract corporation County Decided March decree deed defendant in error delivered the opinion District entitled equity fact filed freight grant Gumaer harbor heirs held high water mark ice-box injury James Bowen Jesse Applegate judgment jurisdiction jury Justice Kansas Keokuk land bounded lands below high lease legislature ment Missouri N. J. Law navigable waters negligence Northern Pacific Railroad Oregon owner parties patent person petitioner plaintiff in error purchase purpose question Rail Railroad Company Railway Company recover riparian road rule September 27 Shively shore Stat statute suit Supreme Court Tanner Territory thereof tide lands tide waters tion tract trustees United verdict vessel Wall wharf wharves writ of error
Beliebte Passagen
Seite 223 - To exercise by its board of directors or duly authorized officers or agents, subject to law, all such incidental powers as shall be necessary to carry on the business of banking; by discounting and negotiating promissory notes, drafts, bills of exchange, and other evidences of debt...
Seite 26 - September last, shall be disposed of for the common benefit of the United States and be settled and formed into distinct republican States, which shall become members of the Federal Union and have the same rights of sovereignty, freedom and independence as the other States...
Seite 215 - It is a finality as to the claim or demand in controversy, concluding parties and those in privity with them, not only as to every matter which was offered and received to sustain or defeat the claim or demand, but as to any other admissible matter which might have been offered for that purpose...
Seite 413 - If two or more persons conspire either to commit any offense against the United States, or to defraud the United States in any manner or for any purpose...
Seite 88 - Every person who, having taken an oath before a competent tribunal, officer, or person, in any case in which a law of the United States authorizes an oath to be administered...
Seite 9 - The legislature may not, under the guise of protecting the public interests, arbitrarily interfere with private business or impose unusual and unnecessary restrictions upon lawful occupations. In other words, its determination as to what is a proper exercise of its police powers is not final or conclusive, but is subject to the supervision of the courts.
Seite 89 - Office shall perform, under the direction of the Secretary of the Interior, all executive duties appertaining to the surveying and sale of the public lands of the United States...
Seite 16 - When the Revolution took place the people of each State became themselves sovereign, and in that character hold the absolute right to all their navigable waters, and the soils under them, for their own common use, subject only to the rights since surrendered by the Constitution to the general government.
Seite 344 - In equity, where the matter in dispute exceeds, exclusive of Interest and costs, the sum or value of two thousand dollars, and arising under the constitution or laws of the United States, or treaties made, or which shall be made, under their authority...
Seite 107 - When the death of one is caused by the wrongful act or omission of another, the personal representatives of the former may maintain an action therefor against the latter, if the former might have maintained an action, had he lived, against the latter for an injury for the same act or omission.