Abbildungen der Seite
PDF
EPUB

SEIZURE OF FORTS.

173

seeing that spirit, gave over every effort for | ministration of the Government is resisted adjustment. If it was necessary to make by those opposed to Mr. Lincoln, the crime

the Constitution itself recognize Slavery, to protect Slavery, by special enactment, they would not touch the question of Constitutional amendment. Mr. Crittenden visited the President, Saturday, to congratulate with him on the adoption, at length, of a settlement. The pure-hearted and patriotic statesman was yet to be undeceived as to the animus of the Southern secessionists; his congratulations were premature.

Caucus of Repubbicans.

A general caucus of Republican members, Saturday, was called to especially consider that seventh section, which was the proposition of Mr. Hale, of Pennsylvania, on the Border Committee. Mr. Howard, of Michigan, objected to any "compromise" at all, as it would, of itself, be an acdnowledgment of wrong which did not exist. Mr. Lovejoy, of Maine, expressed similar sentiments. Speaking of the malcontents of the Slave States, and the proposed compromise of dividing the Territory between Freedom and Slavery to the Pacific, he said: "There never was a more causeless revolt since Lucifer led his cohorts of apostate angels against the throne of God; but I never heard that the Almighty proposed to compromise the matter by allowing the rebels to kindle the fires of hell south of the celestial meridian of thirty-six thirty.”

Mr. Sherman stated that, "as a member of the Committee from the Border States, he could neither vote for the proposition proposed by Mr. Hale, nor that proposed by Mr. Crittenden, to restore the Missouri line and extend it to the Pacific. He was also opposed to the compromise to prevent the abolition of Slavery in the District of Columbia. While he did not wish to abolish it now, he was opposed to yielding up the right of Congress to do so at any future period.

Mr. Grow of Pennsylvania expressed himself decidedly opposed to all compromises. He asked what better platform the North or the South could have to stand upon than the Union, the Constitution and the laws? The Republican party has chosen a President in accordance with the forms of the Constitution, and is entitled to fair play. If his ad

will be theirs. When the Republicans took their position before the election, they knew they would have to meet this state of things, and now they should not put the burden upon posterity.

Messrs. Hickman and Stevens of Pennsylvania, and Case of Indiana, opposed all compromises in speeches couched in unmistakable language.

Mr. Pettit, of Indiana, from the Committee of Border States, said he had approved all the propositions in that Committee except the one proposed by Mr. Hale, upon which he did not vote. He defended the Border States for their efforts to arrange matters.

Mr. Stanton, of Ohio, and Mr. Nixon, of New Jersey, expressed themselves in favor of some compromise.

The caucus unanimously agreed to press the business of the country in the House.

Mr. Dawes of Massachusetts moved that no vote be taken on any of the propositions, and that the caucus adjourn sine die, which was carried.

The caucus was fully attended, and was harmonious at the close against all compromise in view of the ultimatum made by the disunionists of a positive session to Slavery of all territory south of 36 deg. 30 min. They resolved to stand by the Constitution as it is, and to abide the issue. A correspondent at the capital, of a leading Republican (New York) Journal, wrote:

"It may be stated that a majority of the Republicans would sustain the extension of the old Missouri line, pure and simple, through the present Territory as a final settlement, regarding it as a vindication of the principle upon which the party was originally established. They will never concede the recognition and protection of Slavery south of it, either in the present or prospective territory. It was announced in

[blocks in formation]

ment at Washington, and added not a little | lain, in the Representatives Hall, was a most to the gathering sentiment in Congress and eloquent invocation for the Union, for peace, throughout the North against the revolution. and for fraternal conciliation. It impressed These acts of violence, and appropriation of its hearers profoundly. the unprotected property of the General Government, eventually awakened the spirit of coercion in the breasts of men of all parties in the Free States-a spirit which, except for such overt acts might forever have slumbered.* January 4th was observed at Washington with great solemnity, as a day of fasting and prayer. A sermon, preached to an immense audience, by Rev. Thomas Stockton, Chap

* As frequent reference will be made to the forts of the South, we append, from Col. Totten's Peport, a table of the Navy Yards and Forts built by the U. S. Government in the Southern States, together with their cost and armament:

Where located.

Fort McHenry, Baltimore..... *Ft. Carrol, Baltimore....

Ft. Delaware, Del. River, Del....

Ft. Madison, Annapolis, Md..

Ft. Severn, Maryland..

No. of

Cost.
.$146,000 74
135,000 159
539,000 151
31

During the week troops were concentrated in Washington and vicinity to the number of about three hundred. Fort McHenry, in Baltimore, was occupied by one company of artillery, while another company was thrown into Fort Washington. on the Potomac, twelve miles below the Capital. The Navy Yard was placed under a strong guard, and every arrangement made for giving a decidedly

warm reception" to the madmen who might attempt to seize the government buildings. It seems incredible that the design of such a seizure, at that early moment of the revolution, was conceived and entertained; but, there can be no doubt of such a Guns. plot having been concocted. Even papers in Richmond advised the seizure. "Seizures" were, indeed, a potent agency in hastening the revolution. The people were not to be hurried, nor "precipitated" in their steady movement: public opinion was only developed slowly by ordinary processes. Therefore it was necessary, if the leaders would instantly create a fever for action, to seize Government property, and to urge, in justification, the "impending dangers of coercion." This is the key to the seizures at Pensacola, Savannah, Mobile, New Orleans, and, at a later day, in North Carolina and Virginia. A despatch from Savannah, January 5th, said:

5,000

6,000

14

88

371

Ft. Washington, Potomac River..... 575,000
Ft. Monroe, Old Pt. Comfort, Va....2,400,000
Ft. Calhoun, H. R'ds., Norfolk, Va..1,664,000
Ft. Macon, Beaufort, N. C..................
Ft. Johnson, Cape Fear, Wil., N. C..
Ft. Caswell, Oak Island, N. C......
Ft. Sumter, Charleston, S.C.....
Castle Pinckney, Charleston, S. C...
Ft. Moultrie, Charleston, S. C......
Ft. Pulaski, Savannah, Ga..
Ft. Jackson, Savannah, Ga....
Ft. Marion, St. Augustian, Fla...

Ft. Taylor, Key West..

Ft. Jefferson, Tortugas..
Ft. Barancas, Pensacola..
Redoubt, Pensacola...

Ft. Pickens, Pensacola...

224

460,000
5,000 10
571,000 87
677,000 146
43,000 25
75,000 54
923,000 150
80,000 14
51,000 25
185
298

61

315,000 43
109,000 26

759,000 212
384,000 151
...1,212,000 132

Ft. McRee, Pensacola.

Ft. Morgan, Mobile.....

[blocks in formation]

"The pretext that it was necessary to take the forts here because the people would rise against them is the merest subterfuge. The only trouble was the people were not forward enough, and it was necessary to create an excitement in order to bring them to the proper pitch. The common talk of the town declares that all these movements are but preliminary to an attack upon the Federal Capital. Having a friendly country through which to march, and having possession of the forts and arsenals, they say that conquest would be easy. They rely on the supposed weakness of the Administration, and are elated with the ease with which they have gained the forts already taken."

If Washington were seized, the South would provide an army to retain it. This would render the proposed Southern Confederacy the Government de facto, or would, at least, enable the conspirators to dictate their own

THE INTRIGUE EXPOSED.

terms to the North.. The programme was a
brilliant one, it must be confessed, and doubt-
less embodied the combined suggestions of
Messrs. Toombs, Floyd, Governor Wise, Wig-
fall, and other Southern hot-heads. The
President had no army-only a few compa-
nies at his immediate disposal; and, having
no power to call out troops, twenty-five hun-
dred Virginians and Marylanders were
deemed amply sufficient to hold the Federal
Capital. Congress should not be disturbed-
only it should act "circumspectly;" and, as
for Mr. Lincoln-why, of course, he could noted
be inaugurated!

Plot to seize Washington.

All this performance was thwarted by Gen. Scott's and Judge Holt's judicious disposition of their small but effective force at hand, and by the action taken to place the District Military Companies and Militia in a condition for service. The spirit of loyalty grew stronger and stronger, day by day, after January 1st; and if the seizure had been attempted, after that day, at the call of the President one hundred thousand men would have rushed, in arms, to the Capital, from New York and Pennsylvania alone. General Scott, at no period, we are assured, felt the city to be insecure-so well did he know his own strength and the resources available in event of an emergency.

175

of the plot matured, in 1858, to initiate the
long talked-of, the long prayed-for, the long
perfected scheme of a Slave Confederacy.
A very interesting docu-
ment, bearing on this ques- The Intrigue Exposed.
tion of the intrigues of the
managers of the movement, was given to the
public through the columns of the National
Intelligencer newspaper, in Washington, under
date of January 9th. That journal said the
communication came "from a distinguished
citizen of the South, who formerly represent-
his State with great distinction in the
popular branch of Congress. Temporarily
sojourning in this city, he has become authen-
tically informed of the facts recited in the
letter, which he communicates under a sense
of duty, and for the accuracy of which he
makes himself responsible." The communi-
cation was as follows:

"WASHINGTON, Jan. 9, 1861.

"I charge that on last Saturday night a caucus was held in this city by the Southern secession Senators from Florida, Georgia, Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana, Arkansas, and Texas. It was then and there resolved, in effect, to assume to themselves the

political power of the South, and to control all polit ical and military operations for the present. They telegraphed to complete the plan of seizing forts, arsenals, and custom-houses, and advised the Conventions now in session, as soon as possible, to pass ordinances for immediate secession; but, in order to

thwart any operations of the Government here, the

Conventions of the seceding States are to retain

their representations in the Senate and the House.

"They also advised, ordered, or directed the assembling of a Convention of delegates from the se

ceding States at Montgomery, on the 13th of February. This can, of course, only be done by the revolutionary Conventions usurping the powers of the people, and sending delegates over whom they will lose all control in the establishment of a Provisional Government, which is the plan of the dictators.

To become possessed of the capital, was, beyond question, the dream of the revolutionists. The seizure of all the property of the government in the Slave States was but preliminary to the forcible possession of the National Capital itself. The rapidity of action in the seceded States in the formation of a Provisional government-the sudden manner in which an army was brought into the field-demonstrate that the details of the revolution were matured by the leaders long before their movements became public. The filling of Southern Arsenals with rich stores of arms and munitions-the withdrawal of garrisons from Southern forts to send them far off on the Western plains—the depletion of the National treasury to the very verge of bankruptcy, so as to leave the incoming ad-ernments in Texas. ministration powerless from want of means— the disruption of the Charleston Democratic Convention, all were, unquestionably, parts

"This caucus also resolved to take the most effec

tual means to dragoon the Legislatures of Tennessee, Kentucky, Missouri, Arkansas, Texas, and Virginia into following the seceding States. Maryland is also to be influenced by such appeals to popula

passion as have led to the revolutionary steps which

promise a conflict with the State and Federal Gov

66

They have possessed themselves of all the avenues of information in the South-the telegraph, the press, and the general control of the postmasters.

They also confidontly rely upon defections in the system of intrigue, of duplicity, of usurpation army and navy.

[ocr errors]

The spectacle here presented is startling to contemplate. Senators intrusted with the representative sovereignty of the States, and sworn to support the Constitution of the United States, while yet acting as the privy counsellors of the President, and anxiously looked to by their constituents to effect some practical plan of adjustment, deliberately conceive a conspiracy for the overthrow of the Government through the military organizations, the dangerous secret order of the Knights of the Golden Circle, "Committees of Safety," Southern leagues, and other agencies at their command; they have instituted as thorough a military and civil despotism as ever cursed a maddened country."

The confirmation which these statements had in succeeding events gives assurance that the writer was well informed, and unveils the

and wrong through which the entire rebellion was controlled. When the secret history of the conspiracy is written, the Southern people will be amazed to find to what an extent they were instruments in the hands of the designing and restless spirits whose political ambition was only second to their selfishness and slave-owners' pride. We have yet to learn, from a careful examination of all evidence at this moment available-from a rigid scrutiny of individual acts and public movements-that there has been, on the part of the instigators of the revolution, anything of patriotism, of pure motive, of earnest desire for the good of the whole. If this, indeed be true, time surely will unmask the hypocracy of professions and acts.

CHAPTER VIII.

PROCEEDINGS IN CONGRESS CONTINUED. SIXTH WEEK. SPEECHES
OF TOOMBS, HUNTER AND SEWARD.
RESOLUTIONS ENDORSING MAJOR

THE PRESIDENT.

THE PRESIDENT'S MESSAGE.
AND SUSTAINING

ANDERSON

THE proceedings of this ritory until it becomes a State? The TerriMr. Crittenden's week were of the most im- tory was acquired as the common property Speech. portant and interesting na- of all, and now a few attempt to exclude a porture. In the Senate, Monday, (January 7th,) tion from their just rights, because they have Mr. Crittenden called up his resolutions for conscientious scruples on the subject. Were a reference of his compromise to the people, Senators willing to sacrifice the country and supported the proposition with an earnest rather than yield their scruples? But, as a and eloquent appeal. It seemed to him the matter of right, have Senators any right to only course left-to appeal to the people, exclude any property? The Constitution was who would be just arbiters. There was no- formed by men who well knew we had differthing improper in such an appeal-nothing ent institutions in different parts of the counwhich forbade it. He then referred to the try, and no section of the country has a features of his propositions, approving of the right to set up a particular opinion as a rule suggested amendments to the Constitution as for all the rest. Suppose the different secdesirable, to take the Slavery question from tions had different religions, would one secCongress forever. The establishment of a tion try to establish a religion for the other? line dividing the common Territory was less a But the pulpit has become the minister of compromise than a fair adjustment of rights. the politician, and the politician has become The alternative was civil war. Were mem- the minister of the Gospel. No man has the bers of Congress prepared for such an alter-right to insist that another man's conscience native rather than recognize Slavery in a Ter- shall be ruled by his. But he was to deal

[blocks in formation]

dissolved. That is a fixed fact

177

Toombs' Speech.

lying in the way of this discus-
sion, and men may as well
heed it. One of your confederates has already
wisely, bravely, boldly, met the public danger, and

[ocr errors]

confronted it. She is only ahead and beyond any of her sisters, because of her greater facility of action. The great majority of these sister States, under like circumstances, consider her cause as their cause; and I charge you, in their name, here, to-day, touch not seguretum.' While my friend from Kentucky, (Mr. Crittenden,) while the House of Representatives are debating the constitution. ality and the expediency of seceding from the Union, and while the perfidious authors of all this mischief are showering down denunciations upon a large por

tion of the patriotic men of this country, those brave men are calmly and coolly effecting what you

call revolution. Aye, Sir, better than that-an arm

defense. They appealed to the Constitution and to justice-they appealed to fraternity, until the constitutional justice and fraternity was no longer listened to in the legislative halls of the country. And then, Sir, they prepared for the arbitrament of the sword. Now, Sir, you may see the glitter of the bayonet, and hear the tramp of armed men, from your capital to the Rio Grande.

with the present, not the past. He was now to consider the safety of the country, and was here as advocate of the Union, contending for what he thought would save the country. Was a great party grown up which would introduce the Anti-Slavery principle, and was that the principle on which it had triumphed? This triumph filled some portion of the Southern States with alarm. Will the party now in the proud triumph of victory plant itself on platforms and dogmas and not yield an inch, or will they, like generous men, be not only just but liberal? He appealed, to them as patriots and countrymen to grant equal rights to all. He did not think he was asking them to make concessions, but only to grant equal rights. He did not believe in the doctrine of secession. It was a new doc-ed trine, and an attempt to secede with the bold front of a revolution, is nothing but lawless violation of the law and the Constitution. But he only wanted to bear his testimony to the Constitution, and to let it be known that the Constitution cannot be broken. If a State wishes to secede, let them proclaim revolution boldly, and not attempt to hide themselves under little subtleties of law, and claim the right of secession. A constitutional right to break the Constitution, was a new doctrine. He argued that Mr. Webster always went against any right of secession. On one side was an asked concession, and on the other side was civil war. Mr. Toombs, having the Mr. Toombs' Speech. floor, next followed. His speech having been set for Monday, had drawn a very crowded auditory to wait upon its delivery. It was well understood that it would define the extreme Southern programme. It was, as anticipated, extremely violent and defiant ; in many portions it was rank with treasonable threat and declaration; in its entire spirit and matter it exemplified the irreconcileable nature of his views, and those even of the Conservatives in the two Houses. We shall re-produce so much of it as may be necessary to indicate its spirit and intent.

The success of the Abolitionists and their allies, under the name of the Republican party, has produced its logical result already. They have, for long years, been sowing dragon's teeth, and they have finally got a crop of armed men. The Union, Sir, is

"My own position, and my own demands, as I will now give them, are considered the demands of an extreme person, and what you, who talk of Constitutional right, consider treason. I believe that is the term. I believe for all the acts which the Re

publican party call treason and rebellion, there stands before them as good a traitor and as good a rebel as ever descended from revolutionary loins.

What does this rebel demand? That these States

have equal rights to go into the common Territories and remain there with their property, and be protected by the Government till such Territories shall become States. We have fought for this Territory when blood was its price. We have paid for it when money was the price. I demand only that I have leave to go into these Territories upon terms of

equality with you, as equal in this great confederacy, and enjoy my own property, receiving the protection of a common Government until they shall come into the Union as a Sovereign State, and choose

their own institutions. I demand, second, that property in slaves be entitled to the same protection from Government as all other property, and that the Government shall never interfere with the right of any State to abolish or protect Slavery in its own limits. We demand that a common Government shall use its power to protect our property as well as yours. We pay as much as you do. Our property is subject to taxation. We claim that that Government which recognizes our property for tax

« ZurückWeiter »