LV.

1777.

CHAP. the other; while in the party thus impugned the more violent men declared themselves fully convinced that these were malicious acts or inventions of the Tories, merely for the purpose of calumniating and blackening their adversaries ! *

Happily these days of doubt and terror did not long endure. In the beginning of February, a countryman being apprehended at Odiham on a charge of burglary, was identified as John the Painter, and sent up to London for examination. His true name was Aitken, but at various times he had borne many different appellations; he was a native of Edinburgh, and only twenty-four years of age. Three years before he had gone to seek his fortune in America. There he had wrought at his trade, travelling on foot through several of the colonies, and imbibing a hatred of his native country. After his return to England, he became concerned in numerous petty acts of theft and depredation, besides the graver crime of which he stood accused. When brought before Sir John Fielding and other magistrates in London, he showed great craft and coolness, parrying every doubtful question or declining a reply to it. He was committed to prison, but there seemed the utmost difficulty in bringing home the charge to him.

The miscreant did not escape, however. It so chanced that there was another painter, named

Ann. Regist. 1777, p. 30.

See also in Burke's Correspondence (vol. ii. p. 136.), the letter to him from Sir Abraham Elton, of Bristol.

LV.

1777.

Baldwin, who had likewise travelled in America, CHAP. and who was known to Earl Temple. At his Lordship's suggestion this man was summoned to Sir John Fielding's, to determine whether he had ever seen or met the prisoner. As it happened, Baldwin had not; and so he told the magistrates, in the hearing of the culprit, who, in acknowledgment, made him a bow. An acquaintance between them having thus arisen, some conversation ensued in the next room; and Baldwin paid the prisoner frequent visits in the gaol, when, pretending to hold the same principles, he gained his entire confidence. The result was communicated by Baldwin in the first place to Earl Temple, and afterwards, at Earl Temple's desire, to Lord George Germaine. John the Painter was by degrees drawn in to own to his false friend that he was engaged in a design of setting fire to the several dockyards, and thus destroying the navy of Great Britain, and that he had been more than once to Paris to concert his measures for that object with Mr. Silas Deane. "Do you not know "Silas Deane ?" he asked. What, no- not "Silas Deane? He is a fine clever fellow; and I "believe Benjamin Franklin is employed on the "same errand."* The prisoner added that Silas

* Howell's State Trials, vol. xx. p. 1335. Dr. Franklin stands perfectly clear of any communication or connexion with John the Painter; he had only just landed from America; and on the day of the fire at Portsmouth (Dec. 7. 1776), he was still at Nantes. Yet some persons may consider as significant the

LV.

1777.

CHAP. Deane had encouraged him in his noble enterprise, inquiring all the particulars, and supplying him with the money he wanted. He then proceeded to relate how, on his way from Paris, he had stopped at Canterbury to have his combustibles and machinery prepared; how from Canterbury he had gone to Portsmouth; how he there had quarrelled with his landlady, who had pried into his bundle; how he had succeeded in lodging his materials both in the Rope-house and the Hemphouse; how, on the same afternoon, he had hurried from the town, often turning round in hopes to see the result; and how, only a few minutes after he had passed the last sentries, he looked back and beheld the flames ascend. "The very ele"ments," he said, exultingly, "seemed to be in "a blaze!"

Early in March the incendiary was brought to trial at the Winchester Assizes. To his surprise and dismay he saw his friend Baldwin stand forth as the principal evidence against him. It appeared, however, that the prisoner's narrative to Baldwin, as repeated by the latter, was in many minute circumstances most fully confirmed by other witnesses -as by the tinman at Canterbury, and the landlady at Portsmouth,-and the Jury, without doubt

hint which he drops in a letter to Dr. Priestley many months before: "England has begun to burn our sea-port towns; 66 secure, I suppose, that we shall never be able to return the "outrage in kind." (Works, vol. viii. p. 156.)

LV.

1777.

or hesitation, returned a verdict of Guilty. John CHAP. the Painter seemed to be resigned and ready for his doom. When Mr. Baron Hotham told him at the close, "I can give you no hopes of pardon," the prisoner answered firmly, "I do not look for "it, my Lord;" and when the same Judge was proceeding to pass what he termed "the painful "sentence of the law," the prisoner, interrupting him, said "joyful." On the 10th of March he was hanged at Portsmouth, on a gallows sixty feet high, in front of the Dockyard, having first been carried in an open cart round the ruins of the Rope-house. His last words, as he gazed on those ruins, were to acknowledge his crime, and declare his penitence. Indeed he had already, on the day after his trial, made a full confession, owning his incendiary attempts at Portsmouth, at Plymouth, and at Bristol, and repeating his former statement as to Silas Deane. "Mr. Deane told me, when the work was "done, by which he meant burning the Dock

66

yards at Portsmouth, Woolwich, and Bristol "Harbour, but not the houses, I should make my escape, and come, if possible, to him at "Paris, and I should be rewarded. As a reward,

66

my own expectations prompted me to hope that "I should be preferred to a commission in the "American army." In this confession, John the Painter added, that with respect to another American, Dr. Bancroft, who resided in London, and on whom Mr. Deane had directed him to call, he had found that gentleman wholly adverse to his

CHAP. schemes.

LV.

1777.

"And seeing that the Doctor did not approve of my conduct, I said I hoped that he "would not inform against me, to which the "Doctor said, he did not like to inform against 66 any man."

Another trial, at nearly the same period, appears to have attracted more than common interest. The Reverend Mr. Horne had at length flung off his clergyman's gown, which, by his own showing, he should have long since laid aside, or never worn.t He now called himself John Horne, Esquire, and as such, continued active and eager on the democratic side. In the summer of 1775, he had taken the lead in a subscription which he had announced as being for "the relief of the widows, "orphans, and aged parents of our beloved Ame"rican fellow-subjects, who faithful to the character "of Englishmen, and preferring death to slavery,

were for that reason only inhumanly murdered 'by the King's troops at or near Lexington and "Concord, on the 19th of last April." For the libel comprised in these words he was indicted, and, after some of those delays in which our law

* See the whole confession in Howell's State Trials, vol. xx. p. 1365.

† Mr. Horne did not resign his vicarage of New Brentford till 1773. (Life by Stephens, vol. i. p. 419.) Yet so early as 1766, we find him write to Wilkes as follows: "It is true I "have suffered the infectious hand of a Bishop to be waved over 66 me. I allow that usually at that touch-fugiunt pudor, "verumque, fidesque; but I hope I have escaped the contagion." (Ibid. p. 76.)