And they are left to many dangerous ways. * I add yet another : THE YELLOWHAMMER'S NEST. * Just by the wooden bridge a bird flew up, And seek its nest. The brook we need not dread, — * * * * I question if the great bird-painter, Wilson, or our own Australian ornithologist, Mr. Gould (he is a Berkshire man, I am proud to say), or Audubon, or White of Selborne, or Mr. Waterton himself and all those careful inquirers into nature are more or less poets, seldom as they have used the conventional language of poetry-I question if any of these eminent writers have ever exceeded the minuteness and accuracy of these birds' nests. The Poem called "Insects" is scarcely less beautiful. These tiny loiterers on the barley's beard, Secure from rain and dropping dews, and all Keeping their joyous pranks a mystery still, And as I have said above, other qualities too had supervened. The delicacy of sentiment in the following stanzas bears no touch of the uncultivated peasant. FIRST LOVE'S RECOLLECTIONS. First love will with the heart remain As frail rose-blossoms still retain Their fragrance when they die. And joy's first dreams will haunt the mind As summer leaves the stems behind On which spring's blossoms hung. Mary! I dare not call thee dear, Yet once again I vex thine ear Had time and change not blotted out The love of former days, Thou wert the first that I should doubt Of pleasing with my praise. When honied tokens from each tongue How loth to part, how fond to meet, At sunset with what eager feet I hastened unto thee! Scarce nine days passed us ere we met, Now nine years' suns have risen and set, Thy face was so familiar grown, A moment's memory when alone I felt a pride to name thy name, But now that pride hath flown; I felt I then thy heart did share, But much I doubt if thou couldst spare And what is now my name to thee, Though once nought seemed so dear? To please some idle ear. And yet like counterfeits with me Though all the gilded finery That passed for truth is gone. Ere the world smiled upon my lays But now methinks thy fervent love When last thy gentle cheek I pressed E'en loftier hopes than ours;— That was John Clare's last volume, published in 1839, and although generously noticed by the press, it did not sell. Perhaps the very imperfections of the earlier works had made a part of their charm. There is a certain pleasure in being called upon to show indulgence to one whose high gifts are indisputable. Besides the complacency always attending a sense of superiority of any kind, it flatters one's self-love most agreeably (I am speaking of readers, not of critics) to be able to detect and to point out beauties under the veil of defects. Still greater was the pride of being amongst the first discoverers of such endowments. With the novelty, that pleasure vanished. Every child boasts the violet of his own finding, and cherishes and caresses it—while it is fresh; then it disappears and is no more thought of. Woe to us if so we treat a still tenderer flower! However, it happened the popularity diminished as the merit increased. The public, usually so just in its ultimate estimate of authors, failed in this particular instance to recognise the strong and honest claim upon a fair and liberal patronage possessed by one who had been taken from his own humble avocation, from the homely work but the certain reward of the plough, to cultivate the always uncertain, and too often barren and unthankful fields of literature. Such, I fear, poor Clare found them. Improvement had come, but with improvement came sickness and anxiety. The little income had soon been found inadequate to the wants of his aged parents, and the demands of an increasing family: for they will marry, these poets! Poverty overwhelmed him, and sickness-and they who still took a kindly interest in one who had crept so close to the heart of nature in coppice and in field, heard with sorrowful sympathy that the sickness was of the mind. It has been said that pecuniary difficulties were the real cause of the malady, and that the removal of all anxiety as to the means of living would at once cure the delusions under which he labours, and restore him to his home and to his family. I wish it were so, for I think, if that were true (and certainly the fact ought to be ascertained, as nearly as anything of that nature can be ascertained by medical examination), that they who so benevolently lent their aid to lift him from his original obscurity, would, aided by others of a like spirit, step forward to rescue from a still deeper darkness one whose talents had so well justified their former bounty. In the meanwhile it is an alleviation to the painful feeling excited by such a narrative to know that the poor poet, perfectly gentle and harmless, enjoys, in the asylum where he is placed, the wise freedom of person and of action which is the triumph of humanity and of science in the present day. A few years ago he was visited by a friend of mine, himself a poet of the people, who gave me a most interesting account of the then state of his intellect. His delusions were at that time very singular in their character. Whatever he read, whatever recurred to him from his former reading, or happened to be mentioned in conversation, became impressed on his mind as a thing that he had witnessed and acted in. My friend was struck with a narrative of the execution of Charles the First, recounted by Clare, as a transaction that occurred yesterday, and of which he was an eye-witness-a narrative the most graphic and minute, with an accuracy as to costume and manners far exceeding what would probably have been at his command if sane. It is such a lucidity as the disciples of Mesmer claim for clairvoyance. Or he would relate the battle of the Nile and the death of Lord Nelson, with the same perfect keeping, especially as to seamanship, fancying himself one of the sailors who had been in the action, and dealing out nautical phrases with admirable exactness and accuracy, although it is doubtful if he ever saw the sea in his life. About three years before my friend's visit, Mr. Cyrus Redding went to see him, and has given a very interesting description of the poet, and of his state of mind, in the "English Journal.” He says that during his stay he appeared free from all delusion, except once when some allusion was made to prize-fighting, and represents him as regretting the absence of female society, and as continuing to write verse of much merit. I have myself some fragments, written with a pencil, which show all his old power over rhythm.* * About a hundred years ago, Christopher Smart, seized with a similar malady, confined in a madhouse, and deprived of the use of pen, ink, and paper, contrived to indent his Song of David upon the wainscot with the end of a key. I add three stanzas of this fine poem as a psychological curiosity. Times are changed for the better. John Clare has all encouragement to write as often and as much as he chooses. He sang of God, the mighty source From whose right arm, beneath whose eyes Commences, reigns, and ends. [The |