Foreign Armed Intervention in Internal ConflictMartinus Nijhoff Publishers, 08.10.1993 - 234 Seiten The main aim of this book is to inquire into the system of norms regulating the internationalization' of internal conflicts. The traditional distinction between international and internal conflict, which entails different legal consequences, is in practice very difficult to detect due to the presence, in many instances, of elements typical of both situations. Through a careful and extraordinarily useful examination of all relevant cases of internationalized' internal conflict since 1956, the validity of the traditional framework of rules concerning foreign intervention in internal conflict is reassessed. At the same time, the applicability to these situations of the rules typical of international conflicts are analyzed with a view to providing the existence of a "continuum" between the two situations, not only as a matter of fact but also with respect to their legal regulation. |
Inhalt
Preface | 1 |
Uncertainties and Loopholes in the Existing Legal | 2 |
Principal Justifications for Foreign Armed Intervention | 13 |
SelfDefence | 51 |
viii | 58 |
Additional Justifications for Foreign Armed Intervention | 99 |
Armed Intervention for the Protection of Nationals Abroad | 116 |
The Alleged Right of CounterIntervention | 126 |
United States Dominican Republic 1965 | 159 |
USSR And Warsaw Pact Countries Czechoslovakia 1968 | 160 |
France Chad 1968 | 162 |
India Eastern Pakistan Bangladesh 1971 | 163 |
Turkey Cyprus 1974 | 164 |
Indonesia East Timor 1975 | 166 |
Cuba And South Africa Angola 1976 | 167 |
FranceMorocco Zaire 1977 | 169 |
Conclusions | 135 |
Regulation | 137 |
Legitimacy as the Legal Basis for Consent and its Evolution | 138 |
The SelfDefensive Character of Most Armed Interventions | 140 |
Growing Importance of Peoples visàvis Governments | 141 |
Pursuit of International Peace and Protection of State Sovereignty | 142 |
the NonEscalation Principle | 143 |
The Unimpaired Validity of the Charter System | 145 |
A Ban on Force as the Way to Achieve World Peace Does it Work? | 147 |
List of Cases | 149 |
United Kingdom Sultanate Of Muscat Oman 1957 | 150 |
United Kingdom Jordan 1958 | 151 |
United States Lebanon 1958 | 153 |
Belgium Congo 1960 | 154 |
United States Cuba 1961 | 156 |
France Gabon 1964 | 157 |
United StatesBelgium Congo 1964 | 158 |
FranceBelgium Zaire 1978 | 170 |
France Chad 1978 | 172 |
Vietnam Cambodia 19781979 | 173 |
Tanzania Uganda 19781979 | 174 |
Libya Chad 19791980 | 175 |
USSR Afghanistan 1979 | 176 |
United States Grenada 1983 | 179 |
FranceZaire Chad 1983 | 180 |
United States Nicaragua 19811986 | 181 |
United States Panama 1989 | 183 |
United StatesEcowas Countries Liberia 1990 | 185 |
United StatesAllied Powers Iraq 1991 | 186 |
The Conflict In The Former Yugoslavia | 188 |
Bibliography | 197 |
| 229 | |
Andere Ausgaben - Alle anzeigen
Häufige Begriffe und Wortgruppen
action AFDI Afghanistan African aggression AJIL alleged Angola Appendix armed attack armed force Article 2(4 Article 51 authority Bangladesh Bowett Brownlie Cassese Chad Charter claim coercion collective self-defence concept condemned Congo consent counter-intervention countries Croatia Cuban Current Legal Regulation Czechoslovakia Declaration Dominican Republic East Timor effectiveness entitled existence external threat fact forcible foreign intervention French FRETILIN Grenada Humanitarian Intervention ibid infiltration internal conflict international community International Law intervening power Jus Cogens justification Keesing's Lebanon Liberia limited moreover MPLA N'djamena nationals abroad Nicaragua operation peace peremptory norm practice President principle of self-determination problem prohibition protection of nationals question reaction rebels References & Materials relevant request Rescuing response RGDIP right of self-defence Ronzitti rule Security Council self-de self-determination Serbia situation Soviet State's statements supra target territory tervention third tion tional treaty troops United Nations United Nations Charter United States intervention valid victim Vietnam violation vis-à-vis Zaire

