Antislavery hinged upon the antislavery struggle. In this "irrepressible conflict" Massachusetts led the van. Garrison had written in his Liberator, in 1830: "I will be as harsh as truth and as uncompromising as justice. I am in earnest; I will not equivocate; I will not excuse; I will not retreat a single inch; and I will be heard." But the Garrisonian abolitionists remained for a long time, even in the North, a small and despised faction. It was a great point gained when men of education and social standing, like Wendell Phil- Wendell Phillips. lips (1811–84) and Charles Sumner (1811-74), joined themselves to the cause. Both of these were graduates of Harvard and men of scholarly pursuits. They became the representative orators of the antislavery party, Phillips on the platform and Sumner in the Senate. The former first came before the public in his fiery speech, delivered in Faneuil Hall December 8, 1837, before a meeting called to denounce the murder of Lovejoy, who had been killed at Alton, Ill., while defending his press against a pro-slavery mob. Thenceforth Phillips's voice was never idle in behalf of the slave. His eloquence was impassioned and direct, and his English singularly pure, simple, and nervous. He is perhaps nearer to Demosthenes than any other American orator. He was a most fascinating platform speaker on themes outside of politics, and his lecture on "The Lost Arts" was a favorite with audiences of all sorts. Charles Sumner was a man of intellectual tastes, who entered politics reluctantly and only in obedience to the resistless Sumner. leading of his conscience. He was a student of literature and art; a connoisseur of engravings, for example, of which he made a valuable collection. He was fond of books, conversation, and foreign travel, and in Europe, while still a young man, had made a remarkable impression in society. But he left all this for public life, and in 1851 was elected as Speech on the Kansas แ Webster's successor to the Senate of the United States. Thereafter he remained the leader of the abolitionists in Congress until slavery was abolished. His influence throughout the North was greatly increased by the brutal attack upon him in the Senate chamber in 1856 by "Bully Brooks" of South Carolina. Sumner's oratory was stately and somewhat labored. While speaking he always seemed, as has been wittily said, to be surveying a broad landscape of his own convictions." His most impressive qualities as a speaker were his intense moral earnestness and his thorough knowledge of his subject. The most telling of his parliamentary speeches are perhaps his speech "On the Kansas-Nebraska Bill," of February 3, 1854, and “On the Crime against Kansas," May 19 and 20, 1856; of his platform addresses, the oration on "The True Grandeur of Nations." 1. HENRY WADSWORTH LONGFELLOW: "Voices of the Night"; "The Skeleton in Armor"; "The Wreck of the Hesperus"; "The Village Blacksmith"; "The Belfry of Bruges, and Other Poems" (1846); "By the Seaside"; "Hiawatha"; "Tales of a Wayside Inn." 2. OLIVER WENDELL HOLMES. I. Prose: "Autocrat of the Breakfast Table"; "Elsie Venner.” II. Verse: "Old Ironsides"; "The Last Leaf"; "My Aunt"; "The MusicGrinders"; "On Lending a Punch-Bowl"; "Nux Postcœnatica"; "A Modest Request"; "The Living Temple ”; แ Meeting of the Alumni of Harvard College "; "Homesick in Heaven"; "Epilogue to the Breakfast Table Series "; "The Boys"; "Dorothy Q."; "The Iron Gate." 3. JAMES RUSSELL LOWELL. I. Verse: "The Biglow Papers" (two series); "Under the Willows and Other Poems" (1868); "Rhocus"; "The Shepherd of King Admetus"; "The Vision of Sir Launfal"; "The Present แ Beaver แ Crisis"; "The Dandelion"; "The Birch Tree"; Brook." II. Prose: "Chaucer"; "" Shakespeare Once More"; "Dryden"; "Emerson, the Lecturer"; 'Thoreau"; "My Garden Acquaintance"; "A Good Word for Winter"; "A Certain Condescension in Foreigners"; "Democracy." 4. WILLIAM HICKLING PRESCOTT: 'The Conquest of Mexico." 5. JOHN LOTHROP MOTLEY: "The United Netherlands." 6. FRANCIS PARKMAN: "The Oregon Trail"; "The Jesuits in North America." 7. Representative American Orations," volume V. Edited by Alexander Johnston. New York: 1884. Literature as a profession. The magazines. CHAPTER VI. LITERATURE IN THE CITIES -1837-1861. LITERATURE as a profession has hardly existed in the United States until very recently. Even now the number of those who support themselves by purely literary work is small, although the growth of the reading public and the establishment of great magazines, such as Harper's, The Century, and The Atlantic, have made a market for intellectual wares which forty years ago would have seemed a godsend to poorly paid Bohemians like Poe or obscure men of genius like Hawthorne. About 1840, two Philadelphia magazines-Godey's Lady's Book and Graham's Monthlybegan to pay their contributors twelve dollars a page, a price then thought wildly munificent. But the first magazine of the modern type was Harper's Monthly, founded in 1850. Until 1891 American books suffered from the want of an international copyright, which flooded the country with cheap reprints and translations of foreign works, with which the domestic product was unable to contend on such uneven terms. With the first ocean steamers there started up a class of large-paged weeklies in New York and elsewhere, such as Brother Jonathan, The New World, and The Corsair, which furnished their readers with the freshest writings of Dickens and Bulwer and other British celebrities within a fortnight after their appearance in London. This still further restricted the profits of native authors and nearly drove them from the field of periodical literature. By special arrangement the novels of Thackeray and other English writers were printed in Harper's in installments 156 simultaneously with their issue in English periodicals. The Atlantic was the first of our magazines which was Men of letters in journalism. founded expressly for the encouragement of home talent, and which had a purely Yankee flavor. Journalism was the profession which naturally attracted men of letters, as having most in common with their chosen work and as giving them a medium, under their own control, through which they could address the public. A few favored scholars, like Prescott, were made independent by the possession of private fortunes. Others, like Holmes, Longfellow, and Lowell, gave to literature such leisure as they could get in the intervals of an active profession or of college work. Still others, like Emerson and Thoreau, by living in the country and making their modest competence-eked out in Emerson's case by lecturing here and there-suffice for their simple needs, secured themselves freedom from the restraints of any regular calling. But, in default of some such pou sto, our men of letters have usually sought the cities and allied themselves with the press. It will be remembered that Lowell started a short-lived magazine on his own account, and that he afterward edited The Atlantic and The North American. Also that Ripley and Charles A. Dana betook themselves to journalism after the break-up of the Brook Farm Community. Wm. Cullen In the same way William Cullen Bryant (1794-1878), the earliest American poet of importance, whose impulses drew Bryant. him to the solitudes of nature, was compelled to gain a livelihood by conducting a daily newspaper; or, as he himself puts it, was "Forced to drudge for the dregs of men, And scrawl strange words with the barbarous pen." Bryant was born at Cummington, Massachusetts. After two years in Williams College he studied law, and practiced for nine years as a country lawyer in Plainfield and Great Bar |