 | John Pitt Taylor - 1848 - 756 Seiten
...contains what was not intended, or omits what it should have contained. It cannot affect third persons ; who, if it were otherwise, might be prejudiced by...precluded from proving the truth, however contradictory it may be to the written statements of others («). Thus, in a settlement case, where the value of... | |
 | Simon Greenleaf - 1866 - 756 Seiten
...what was not intended, or omits that which it should have contained. It cannot affect third persons; who, if it were otherwise, might be prejudiced by...writings, contrary to the truth, through the ignorance, careless, or fraud of the parties ; and who, therefore, ought not to be precluded from proving the... | |
 | 1871 - 530 Seiten
...Krider v. Lafferty 1 Whart. 314 (1835), in which Kennedy, J., remarks: " It cannot affect third persons, who, if it were otherwise, might be prejudiced by...proving the truth, however contradictory to the written intruments of others." In Johnson v. Stockman, 11 Conn. 342 (1836), A., the payee of a note made jointly... | |
 | Thomas Harvey Coldwell - 1870 - 790 Seiten
...prejudiced by things contained in the writing, contrary to the truth, through the carelessness, ignorance or fraud of the parties, and who, therefore, ought...from proving the truth, however contradictory to the statement of others." Starkie does not undertake to express the exception to the rule, as to the admissibility... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court, Samuel Freeman Miller - 1875 - 848 Seiten
...down. The rule excluding parol proof in such cases, says Mr. Greenleaf, cannot affect third persons ; who, if it were otherwise, might be prejudiced by...proving the truth, however contradictory to the written instruments of others. In Krider v. Lafferty, (I Whar. 314,) it is held, that the rule is applicable... | |
 | Isaac Grant Thompson - 1875 - 866 Seiten
...it speaks the whole truth upon the subject-matter. It does not apply to third persons, who are not precluded from proving the truth, however contradictory to the written statements of others. Strangers to the instrument, not having come into this agreement, are not bound by it, and may show... | |
 | Horace Gay Wood - 1886 - 682 Seiten
...it speaks the whole truth upon the subject-matter. It does not apply to third persons, who are not precluded from proving the truth, however contradictory to the written statements of other. Strangers to the instrument, not having come into this agreement, are not bound by it, and may... | |
 | 1901 - 2042 Seiten
...It cannot affect third persons, who, if it were otherwise, might be prejudiced by things recited ia the writings, contrary to the truth, through the ignorance,...contradictory to the written statements of others." See, >also, Whart. Ev. 923. In a suit between a party and a stranger, neither is concluded by the contract,... | |
 | Quebec (Province) - 1883 - 824 Seiten
...was not intended, or omits that which it should have contained. It cannot a Ile et third persons ; who, if it were otherwise, might be prejudiced by...contradictory to the written statements of others. § 280. It is almost superfluous to add, that the rule does not exclude the testimony of experts, to... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1884 - 862 Seiten
...down. The rule excluding parol proof in such cases, says Mr. Greenleaf, cannot affect third persons; who, if it were otherwise, might be prejudiced by...proving the truth, however contradictory to the written instruments of others. In Krider v. Lafferty, 1 Whart., 314, it is held, that the rule is applicable... | |
| |
It cannot affect third persons who, if it were otherwise, might be prejudiced by things recited in the writings contrary to the truth through the ignorance, carelessness or fraud of the parties ; and who, therefore, ought not to be precluded from proving... 
