"To-day his Majesty writ to us, to quicken us, and that we should conclude his business without any re cesses. Thereupon our House called all the defaulters, and the Sergeant at Arms to send for them, and they not to sit till they have paid their fees."

A few days afterwards he thus writes:-"To-day the Duke of Buckingham and the Marquesse of Dorchester were, upon their petitions, freed from the Tower, having been committed for quarrelling, and scuffling the other day, when we were at the Canary conference."

January 26:-" At eleven o'clock we went up to the Lords, to manage the impeachment against LORD MORDANT. Our managers observed that he sat in the House, and that he had counsell, whereas he ought to stand at the barr as a criminal, and to have no counsell to plead or manage his cause."

Marvell's attention to the business of Parliament, and in writing to his constituents, appears to have been excessive, for we find from a letter, dated November 14, 1667, in which he says:-" Really the business of the House hath been of late so carnest, daily, and so long, that I have not had the time, and scarce the vigour, left me by night to write to you; and to-day, because I would not omit any longer, I lose my dinner to make sure of this letter. The EARL OF CLARENDON hath taken up much of our time, till within these three days: but since his impeachment hath been carryed up to the House of Lords, we have some leisure from that business."

December 3rd:-" Since my last to you we have had a free conference with the Lords, for not committing the Earl of Clarendon upon our general charge. The Lords yesterday sent a message by Judge Archer, and Judge Morton, that they were not satisfyed to commit him,

without particular cause specifyed; whereupon our House voted that the Lords, not complying with the desire of the House of Commons, upon the impeachment carried up against him, is an obstruction to public justice in the proceedings of both Houses of Parliament, and is the president of evill and dangerous consequences. Today the Lords sent down by Judge Twisden, and Judge Brown, another message to us, that they had received a large petition from the Earl of Clarendon, intimating that he was withdrawn. Hereupon our House forthwith ordered addresses to his Majesty, that care might be taken for securing all the Sea ports less he should pass there. I suppose he will not trouble you at Hull.”

March 17, 1668:-"To-day the House, before a Committee of the whole House, sat and voted that towards the King's supply of £300,000. they will raise at least £100,000. upon wines and strong waters."

Respecting the King sitting in person in the House of Lords during the debates, Marvell thus writes, March 26, 1670, "His Majesty hath for this whole week come every day in person to the House of Lords, and sate there during their debates and resolutions. And yesterday the Lords went in a body to Witchall, to give him thanks for the honour he did them." To WILLIAM RAMSDEN, Esq. a few days after, he states the particulars of the King's visit more fully. "The King about ten o'clock took boat with LAUDERDALE only, and two ordinary attendants, and rowed awhile as towards the bridge, but soon turned back to the Parliament stairs, and so went up into the House of Lords, and took his seat. All of them were amazed, but the Duke of York especially. After the King was seated, his Majesty told them it was a privilege he claimed from his ancestors, to be present at their de

liberations. After three or four days' continuance, the Lords were well used to the King's presence, and sent the Lord Steward, and Lord Chamberlain, to enquire when they might render him their humble thanks for the họhonour he did them. The hour was appointed, and they thanked his Majesty, who took it well. The King has ever since continued his session among them, and says, 'it is better than going to a play.” And in the same letter Marvell adds,-"There is some talk of a French Queen to be invented for our King. Some say a sister of the King of Denmark; others, a good virtuous Protestant, here at home. The King disavows it, yet he has sayed in public, he knew not why a woman may not be divorced for barrenness, as a man for impotency."

April 9:-"SIR JOHN PRITIMAN, who serves for Leicester, was yesterday suspended from sitting in the House, and from all privilege, till he find out one Hume, (a most notorious fellow) whom he suggested to be his meniall servant; whereas he was a prisoner for debt, and thus, by Sir John's procurement, has escaped his creditors. The Sergeant was sent into the Speaker's chamber with the mace, to bring Sir John, to receive the sentence upon his knees, at the barre. Hereupon the House was disappointed; for in the mean while he was escaped by the back doore; it was then ordered that that doore be nailed up for the future."

Also of a similar escape he thus writes:-"SIR JAMES NORFOLK, Sergeant of the House of Commons, was by them voted to be sent to the Tower; and that his Majesty be desired to cause a new Sergeant to attend, he having betrayed his trust, &c. but Sir James forthwith escaped from the House while they were penning the order."

December 8th:-"The bill for Conventicles hath been twice read, and committed; it makes them henceforth RIOTS; and orders that those who cannot pay five shillings, or who refuse to tell their names, or abode, shall work it out in the House of Correction."

December 20:-"The House, before rising to-day, ordered that the Sheriffs of countycs give notice that all members not present in the House on Monday come a fortnight, should be rated double in the bill of Subsidy, so that it will concern them in the country to be up by that time, and if sooner, the better. One moved, that a frigate should be built out of the money, and she might be named the sinner's frigate.”

April 13, 1671:-"The Lords and we have agreed on an addresse to his Majesty, that he wear no forain manufactures, and discountenance, whether man or woman, who shall wear them."

By some accident we are unfortunately deprived of Marvell's correspondence with his constituents for above three years. The DUKE OF MONMOUTH was at that time Governor of Hull, and the Corporation appears to have desired Marvell to wait upon him, with a congratulatory letter, and a present of gold, both as a testimony of their duty and respect, and also as an honorary fee of his office. After executing this commission, he thus writes:

"GENTLEMEN,

"Westminster, October 20, 1674.

The Duke of Monmouth returned on Saturday from New. market. To-day I waited on him, and first presented him with your letter, which he read over very attentively, and then | prayed me to assure you that he would, upon all occasions, be most ready to give you the marks of his affection, and assist you in any affairs that you should recommend to him; with other words of civility to the same purpose. I then delivered

D

him the six broad pieces, telling him I was deputed to blush on your behalfe for the meanness of the present, &c.; but he took me off, and said he thanked you for it, and accepted it as a token of your kindness. He had, before I came in, as I was told, considered what to do with the gold; but that I by all means prevented the offer, or I had been in danger of being re. imbursed with it. I received the bill which was sent me on Mr. Nelchorpe; but the surplus of it exceeding much the expense I have been at on this occasion, I desire you to make use of it, and of me, upon any other opportunity, remaining,

Gentlemen, &c.

Your most affectionate and humble Servant,

ANDREW MARVELL." April 17, 1675:-"The Commons have these two days been in a Committee concerning Religion. The occasion of which rose from the motion of a Member of the House concerning the growth of Popery, for giving case to Protestant Dissenters, and other good things of the same tendency."

April 22:-"A bill was read the first time, that any Member of Parliament, who shall hereafter accept any office, after his election, there shall be a new writ issuedto elect in his place; but if his Borough shall then, the second time, elect him, it shall be lawful; upon the ques tion, whether it should have a second reading, 88 carried it against 74."

April 24:"The House of Commons having received a report from the Committee for drawing up the addresse concerning the Duke Lauderdale; Dr. BURNETT being examined, whether he knew any thing of bringing over an army into his Majesty's dominions, told them, that discoursing of the danger of rigorous proceedings against the Presbyterians in Scotland, while his Majesty was engaged in a war with Holland, the Duke said to him, he wished they would rebell; and in pursuit of that dis

1