State and Party in America's New DealUniv of Wisconsin Press, 1995 - 342 Seiten Providing a needed historical perspective on current debates about industrial and agricultural policy, Kenneth Finegold and Theda Skocpol compare the origins, implementation, and consequences of two similar programs from Franklin Roosevelt's New Deal, each of which committed the federal government to extensive intervention in sectors of the U.S. economy. The Agricultural Adjustment Administration (AAA) and its industrial counterpart, the National Recovery Administration (NRA), had very different fates. The politically and economically successful AAA set trends in American farm policy that continue to the present. The NRA was rejected as an abysmal failure. Why such drastically different outcomes? A historical and institutional approach, Finegold and Skocpol contend, can explain the similarities and differences of the NRA and AAA better than competing approaches of pluralism, elite theory, Marxism, or rational choice. They show that the AAA aided large commercial farmers and increased their power over tenants, sharecroppers, and farm workers. The NRA, however, worked against the interests of its original business supporters and encouraged union organization among their workers. Finegold and Skocpol explain the contrasts in these programs by showing differences in the organization of governmental intervention in agriculture and in industry before the New Deal, and by tracking the differing ways capitalists, farmers, and workers participated in the New Deal political coalition. Both Finegold and Skocpol have been prominent in bringing renewed attention to national political institutions. Their crisp analysis of state and party dynamics contributes to theories of politics in advanced industrial societies and will appeal to political scientists, policy makers, sociologists, historians, and economists--in short, all those who must understand how past programs influence present U.S. policies. |
Inhalt
New Deal Interventions in Industry | 3 |
Explaining the National Recovery | 27 |
The Origins of the NRA and the AAA | 66 |
The Implementation of Industrial | 90 |
The Consequences for Class Relations in Industry | 115 |
Approaches | 153 |
Marxist Approaches to Politics and the State | 175 |
Actors and Institutions | 200 |
The New Deal and the Next Deal | 222 |
Notes | 245 |
329 | |
Andere Ausgaben - Alle anzeigen
Häufige Begriffe und Wortgruppen
Administration agricultural agricultural policy alternative American analysis approaches Association authority became bill Black Board Bureau campaign capacity capital capitalists collective Commerce competition Congress congressional consequences Cooperation cotton created David Deal demands Democratic Department Depression economic economists effects efforts election electoral elite experts Farm farmers federal George groups History Hoover ideas idem implementation important increased individual industrial policy influence institutions interest intervention John Johnson labor leaders legislation less liberal major March marketing Marxism ment National NIRA officials organizations origins party Peek planning Politics position president Princeton problems production control proposals rational choice Recovery Relations representatives Republican response Review Robert Roosevelt rule Section 7(a sectors Senator Social South southern strike structure success suggests theory tion trade unions United University Press vote wages Wagner Act Washington workers World York
Verweise auf dieses Buch
State Autonomy Or Class Dominance?: Case Studies on Policy Making in America G. William Domhoff Eingeschränkte Leseprobe |
One Nation, Uninsured: Why the U.S. Has No National Health Insurance Jill Quadagno Eingeschränkte Leseprobe - 2006 |