United States Indian Claims Commission, August 13, 1946-September 30, 1978: Final Report, Bände 2-6The Commission, 1979 - 141 Seiten |
Im Buch
Ergebnisse 1-5 von 18
Seite 1
... allowed this policy , and pro forma use of the treaty con- formed to his Anglo - Saxon tradition and concern for the law . For the Indian the legality of it all was of little comfort . 4 It was this precise legalistic tradition that ...
... allowed this policy , and pro forma use of the treaty con- formed to his Anglo - Saxon tradition and concern for the law . For the Indian the legality of it all was of little comfort . 4 It was this precise legalistic tradition that ...
Seite 2
... allowed to replace the military arena and the Choctaw precedent broadened this format . It was in this year that a prominent New York attorney , Charles O'Connor , publicly lauded the Court of Claims as the " first- born of a new ...
... allowed to replace the military arena and the Choctaw precedent broadened this format . It was in this year that a prominent New York attorney , Charles O'Connor , publicly lauded the Court of Claims as the " first- born of a new ...
Seite 4
... allowed by certiorari to the Court of Claims . Its jurisdiction was to embrace all outstanding tribal claims of a legal , equitable , or moral nature presented within a 5 year limit . The commission had thus matured from a fact ...
... allowed by certiorari to the Court of Claims . Its jurisdiction was to embrace all outstanding tribal claims of a legal , equitable , or moral nature presented within a 5 year limit . The commission had thus matured from a fact ...
Seite 6
... allowed because the expert witness , unlike the ordinary witness , could offer his opinion . In spite of the deficiencies of the process , attorney Donald C. Gormley , of one of the most prominent firms en- gaged in Indian law ...
... allowed because the expert witness , unlike the ordinary witness , could offer his opinion . In spite of the deficiencies of the process , attorney Donald C. Gormley , of one of the most prominent firms en- gaged in Indian law ...
Seite 7
... allowed them as offsets . The Commission , though , allowed relatively lower percentages of offsets pleaded as the years passed . In a case decided in 1957 , only $ 400,000 was allowed of the $ 2 million pleaded by the Government . But ...
... allowed them as offsets . The Commission , though , allowed relatively lower percentages of offsets pleaded as the years passed . In a case decided in 1957 , only $ 400,000 was allowed of the $ 2 million pleaded by the Government . But ...
Häufige Begriffe und Wortgruppen
1978-Continued Tribe 1978—Continued Tribe Vol Additional findings Affirmed Apache Award with Dkt California Indians certifying & transferring Certiorari Certiorari denied Cherokee Chippewa Citizen Band claim in Dkt Colville Reservation Comm Commissioner compromise settlement Confederated Tribes Congress Court of Claims curiam opinion Decision Date Disposition denying defendant's motion dockets Final award Final judgment Final order dismissing Findings in Dkt Findings on compromise Findings Title Fort Sill Hannahville Indian Claims Commission Indian title Interlocutory order land Interlocutory order Miami Missouria motion for rehearing motion for summary motion to dismiss Mountain Band Oklahoma Opinion in Dkts Opinion on defendant's Opinion on motion Opinion on plaintiff's Order amending findings Order certifying Order denying motion Order dismissing petition Order in Dkt Osage Nation Ottawa Peoria petition in Dkt Piankeshaw Pima-Maricopa plaintiffs Potawatomi Indians Prairie Band Pueblo Red Lake Band Sac and Fox Saginaw Seneca Nation September summary judgment Transferred to Court Treaty unnumbered Order dismissing
Beliebte Passagen
Seite iv - CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AT THE SECOND SESSION, BEGUN AND HELD AT THE CITY OF WASHINGTON ON MONDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF DECEMBER, ONE THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED AND SEVENTEEN. JOINT RESOLUTION PROPOSING AN AMENDMENT TO THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES.
Seite 7 - President; (2) all other claims in law or equity, including those sounding in tort, with respect to which claimant would have been entitled to sue in a court of the United States...
Seite 1 - That the lands of this country were taken from them by conquest, is not so general a truth as is supposed. I find in our historians and records, repeated proofs of purchase, which cover a considerable part of the lower country ; and many more would doubtless be found on further search. The upper country, we know, has been acquired altogether acquired by purchases made in the most unexceptionable form.
Seite 1 - ... the earth was given to mankind to support the greatest number of which it is capable, and no tribe or people have a right to withhold from the wants of others more than is necessary for their own support and comfort.
Seite 10 - The Commission shall hear and determine the following claims against the United States on behalf of any Indian tribe, band, or other identifiable group of American Indians residing within the territorial limits of the United States or Alaska...
Seite 7 - States was subject to suit; (3) claims which would result if the treaties, contracts, and agreements between the claimant and the United States were revised on the ground of fraud, duress, unconscionable consideration, mutual or unilateral mistake, whether of law or fact, or any other ground cognizable by a court of equity; (4) claims arising from the taking by the United States, whether as the result of a treaty of cession or otherwise, of lands owned or occupied by the claimant without the payment...
Seite 2 - That from and after the passage and approval of this act the jurisdiction of the Court of Claims shall not extend to or include any claim against the United States based upon or growing out of the destruction of any property or damage done to any property by the military or naval forces of the United States...
Seite 5 - ... in the process. It would be a miracle if in the course of these dealings — the largest real estate transaction in history — we had not made some mistakes and occasionally failed to live up to the precise terms of our treaties and agreements with some 200 tribes. But we stand ready ... to correct any mistakes we have made.
Seite 5 - Instead of confiscating Indian lands, we have purchased from the tribes that once owned this continent more than 90 percent of our public domain, paying them approximately 800 million dollars in the process. It would be a miracle if in the course of these dealings — the largest real estate transaction in history — we had not made some mistakes and occasionally failed to live up to the precise terms of our treaties and agreements with some 200 tribes.
Seite 5 - This bill makes perfectly clear what men and women, here and abroad, have failed to recognize, that in our transactions with the Indian tribes we have at least since the Northwest Ordinance of 1787 set for ourselves the standard of fair and honorable dealings...