Opinion of the Court, per DAVIES, J. PETER A. LE COUTEULX, Appellant, v. THE CITY OF BUFFALO, ▲ corporation is not limited to the exercise of the powers specifically granted, The common council of the city of Buffalo have full and ample power to take and hold any property transferred to them for the use of common schools in said city. 66 By the term 'common schools," is to be understood such schools as are common or open to all, in a certain locality. Per DAVIES, J. Prior to 1851, the defendant had power, under the laws of the State, to establish and maintain free schools within its limits, and could legally take and hold real estate for such purpose. A. P. Nichols, for the appellant. Harmon S. Cutting, for the respondent. DAVIES, J. This action was brought to recover the possession of a certain lot of land in the city of Buffalo in possession of, and the title to which is claimed by, the defendant. It is averred in the complaint that Louis Le Couteulx, being the owner of the real estate in controversy, made and executed on the 30th day of May, 1838, under his hand and seal, a deed for the same, reciting that the party of the first part, with a view of aiding in the establishment of an institution where the children of those who are unable or unwilling to provide for their education may receive the same free of expense, and also in consideration of one dollar, thereby granted and conveyed the said premises to the said party of the second part and its assigns, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned forever. It was declared in said deed that the said premises thereby conveyed were to be held and appropriated by said city for the use, maintenance and support of a "free school," and for no other purpose. It was further averred that said Louis Le Couteulx died in the month of November, 1840, having previously made his last will and testament, whereby he devised and bequeathed to 33 333 122 271 33 333 125 595 33 333 144 551 Opinion of the Court, per DAVIES, J this plaintiff in fee simple the said premises. That the defendant never took or entered into the possession of the said premises until some time in the year 1857, when the said defendant took possession thereof under said deed, at which time the defendant inclosed said premises and erected a building thereon for the use, maintenance and support of a free school, and that said defendant has ever since occupied said premises for the use, maintenance and support of a free school, and now is in the possession of said premises for such purpose, and claims title thereto under such instrument in writing and not otherwise. The plaintiff claimed title to said premises, and demanded the possession thereof. To this complaint the defendant demurred, and the Superior Court of Buffalo gave judgment for the defendant, and the plaintiff now appeals to this court. The defendant was incorporated by an act of the legislature passed in 1832. (Laws of 1832, ch. 179.) The second section of the act authorized the corporation to take, hold, purchase and convey such real estate as the purposes of the corporation might require. The charter of the city was amended by an act passed in 1837. (Laws of 1837, ch. 392.) By the eleventh section of this act, the mayor and aldermen who, by the charter of 1832, composed the common council of said city, were constituted commissioners of schools in and for said city, and the common council were authorized to perform all the duties of such commissioners, and should possess all the rights, powers and authority of commissioners of common schools, in the several towns of this State. All moneys raised in said city, under the laws of the State for the support of common schools, were to be expended by and under the direction of said common council, and said common council had given to them the same powers as were given by law to the towns of this State, to raise additional moneys for the support of common schools in said city. And the school moneys distributed by the State as part of the common school fund thereof, to said city, were also to be expended by the common council of said city, for the support of the common schools therein. Opinion of the Court, per DAVIES, J. The commissioners of common schools in each town of the State, have the powers and privileges of a corporation, so far as to enable them to take and hold property transferred to them for the use of common schools in said towns. (1 R. S., 474, § 42.) The powers of the common council of Buffalo in relation to common schools in said city were greatly enlarged by an act further to amend the charter of said city, passed March 12, 1838. (Laws of 1838, ch. 63.) By the 1st subd. of sec. 16 of this act, the common council is empowered to designate and purchase or lease in each school district, a site or sites for the school house or school houses therein, and to improve the same, as to them shall seem suitable and proper. 2. To build and erect on such site or sites, or on any lot owned by such district, such school house or school houses as to them shall appear suitable and sufficient for such districts. 3. To complete, improve, enlarge or repair any such school house or school houses. 4. To raise by tax from time to time, such sums as they may deem necessary for the purposes specified in such section. The charter of said city was further amended by an act passed February 24, 1839 (Laws of 1839, ch. 24), and the 22d section of said act declares, that thereafter all the district schools organized within the city of Buffalo shall be public and free to all children residing within said district under the age of sixteen years, and the said common council were authorized to levy and collect by tax sufficient moneys the expenses of such schools. to pay By an act of the legislature passed April 12, 1851, entitled "An act to establish Free Schools throughout the State" (Laws of 1851, ch. 151), it is declared that common schools in the several school districts of this State shall be free to all persons residing in the district, over five and under twentyone years of age. We thus see that the entire system of public education at the public expense within the city of Buffalo, was committed to the control of the corporation thereof. The education of Opinion of the Court, per DAVIES, J. the children residing within that city became one of the purposes and objects for the organization of that government, and for which it was instituted and maintained. By its fundamental law, it was authorized to take, hold, purchase and convey such real estate as the purposes of the corporation might require. This is but a reiteration of the provision of the Revised Statutes applicable to all corporations. (1 R. S., 509, § 1.) A corporation is not limited to the exercise of the powers specifically granted, but possesses, in addition, all such powers as are either necessarily incident to those specified, or essential to the purposes and objects of its corporate existence. A municipal corporation, therefore, may at common law, unless restrained by some statute, purchase and hold all such real estate as may be necessary to the proper exercise of any power specifically conferred, or essential to those purposes of municipal government for which it was created. (Ketchum v. City of Buffalo, 4 Kern., 356.) In this case it was held by this court that an authority conferred upon this defendant "to establish and regulate markets," authorized a purchase by the common council of Buffalo upon credit, of a site, whereon to erect and establish a market. It was pertinently said, "without the power to procure a suitable place, the first step could not be taken towards the establishment or foundation of a market. The power to establish, therefore, must of necessity include that of procuring the requisite site." But in the present instance we are not driven to an inferential derivation of the power. It is conferred in express terms by the act of 1837, which conferred upon the common council of Buffalo all the rights, powers and authority of commissioners of common schools of the several towns of this State, and we have seen that among the powers and authority conferred by law upon such commissioners, was the power to take and hold any property transferred to them for the use of common schools in such town. In addition to this power to take and hold any property transferred to them for the purposes aforesaid, the act of 1838, in express terms, authorized the common council to purchase or lease a site or sites Opinion of the Court, per DAVIES, J. for any school house, and to build and erect school houses thereon. The common council had, therefore, prior to the conveyance by the plaintiff's ancestor, full and ample power to take and hold any property transferred to them for the use of common schools in said city, or to purchase ground and to erect thereon suitable buildings for the education of the children in said city. What are we to understand by the language "common schools?" Unquestionably, that the schools are common, or open to all, in a certain locality. In this sense, common schools of this State have always been free schools. But it must be conceded that the general understanding and the provisions of law confirm this, that the common schools, in one sense, were not free, that is that scholars attending them could not do so free of all charge and expense. Prior to 1851, the common schools of the State, in this particular, could not be said to be free. But the defendant had power and authority to raise, by tax, such sums as it might deem necessary to maintain schools in the city of Buffalo, and to purchase sites therefor, and erect buildings thereon, except the wages of teachers. To defray the wages of the teachers in the several schools of said city, it could apply the amount received from the common school fund of the State, and also collect and levy, by tax, four times that amount in addition thereto. It is not averred or alleged in the complaint, that these various sums were not adequate to the entire expense of maintaining the schools, and if so, then the schools in Buffalo, under the charge and management of the defendant, were in every and all senses free. This certainly was the understanding of the legislature when it subsequently declared, by the act of 1839, that thereafter all the district schools organized within the city of Buffalo, should be public and free. It is plain, therefore, that the defendant had the power to establish and maintain a free school or schools within the city of Buffalo, in the largest sense, and was expressly authorized to take and hold property for that purpose. It is immaterial to the present inquiry, which is one of power alone in the defendant to take under the deed, whether the sum raised by the TIFFANY.-VOL. VI. 43 |