Abbildungen der Seite
PDF
EPUB

ters one of our cabins, we all treat him as I do you; we dry him if he is wet, we warm him if he is cold, and give him meat and drink, that he may allay his thirst and hunger; and we read soft furs for him to rest and sleep on: we demand nothing in return.* But if I go into a white man's house at Albany, and ask for victuals and drink, they say, Where is your money? and if I have none, they say, Get out, you Indian dog. You see that they have not learned thos Lule good things that we need no meetings to be in structed in, because our mothers taught them u when we were children; and therefore it is impossible their meetings should be, as they say, for any such purpose, or have any such effect; they are only camrive the cheating of Indians in the price of beaver."

It is remarkable that, in all ages and countries, hospitality has been allowed as the virtue of those, whom the civilized were pleased to call barbarians; the Greeks celebrared the Scythians for it, the Saracens possessed it eminently; and it m to this day the reigning virtue of the wild Arabs. St. Paul, too, in the relation of ha voyage and ship wreck, on the island of Melita, says, "The barbarous people showed us no uttle sindness; for they kindled a fire, and reserved us every one. becaus. of the present rain, and because of the cold." This note is taken rom a small collection of FrankMu's papers, printed for Dilly

[ocr errors]

TO MR. DUBOURG.

CONCERNING THE DISSENTIONS BETWEEN ENGLAND
AND AMERICA.

London, October 2, 1770.

I SEE, with pleasure, that we think pretty much alike on the subjects of English America. We of the colonies have never insisted that we ought to be exempt from contributing to the common expenses necessary to support the prosperity of the empire. We only assert, that having parliaments of our own, and not having representatives in that of Great Britain, our parliaments are the only judges of what we can and what we ought to contribute in this case; and that the English parliament has no right to take our money without our consent. In fact, the British empire is not a single state; it comprehends many; and though the parlament of Great Britain has arrogated to itself the power of taxing the colonies, it has no more right to do so, then it has to tax Hanover. We have the same king, but not the same legislatures.

The dispute between the two countries has already lost England many millions sterling, which it has lost in its commerce, and America has in this respect Deen a proportionable gai her. This commerce consisted principally of superfluities: objects of luxury and fashion, which we can well do without; and the resolution we have formed of importing no more till our grievances are redressed, has enabled many of our intant manufacturers to take root; and it will not be easy to make our people abandon them in fu ture, even should a connexion more cordial than ever succeed the present troubles.I have, indeed, nc doubt, that the parliament of England will finally abandon its present pretensions, and leave us to the peaceable enjoyment of our rights and privileges.

B. FRANKL.IN.

A Comparison of the Conduct of the Ancient Jews, and of the Antifederalists in the United States of America.

A ZEALOUS advocate for the proposed Federal Con stitution in a certain public assembly said, that “the repugnance of great part of mankind to good govern ment was such, that he believed that if an angel from beaven was to bring down a constitution formed there for our use, it would nevertheless meet with violent opposition."-He was reproved for the sup posed extravagance of the sentiment; and he did not justify it.-Probably it might not have immediately occurred to him, that the experiment had been tried, and that the event was recorded in the most faithful of all histories, the Holy Bible; otherwise he might as it seems to me, have supported his opinion by that unexceptionable authority.

The Supreme Being had been pleased to nourish up a single family, by continued acts of his attentive providence, until it became a great people. and having rescued them from bondage by many miracles performed by his servant Moses, he personally delivered to that chosen servant, in presence of the whole nation, a constitution and code of laws for their observance; accompanied and sanctioned with promises of great rewards, and threats of severe punishments, as the consequence of their obedience or disobedience.

This constitution, though the Deity himself was to be at its head (and it is therefore called by political writers a theocracy) could not be carried into execu ion but by means of his ministers: Aaron and hs Bons were commissioned to be, with Moses, the first established ministry of the new government.

One would have thought, that the appointment of men, who had distinguished themselves in procuring the liberty of their nation, and had hazarded their lives in openly opposing the will of a powerful "nonarch who would have retained that nation in sia very, migl. have been an' appointment acceptable to

[ocr errors]

a grateful people, and that a constitution framed for them by the Deity himself, might on that account have been secure of an universal welcome reception Yet there were, in every one of the thirteen tribes, some discontented, restless spirits, who were continu aliy exciting them to reject the proposed new govern. ment, and this from various motives.

Many still retained an affection for Egypt, the land of their nativity; and these, whenever they felt any nconvenience or hardship, though the natural and unavoidable effect of their change of situation, exclaimed against their leaders as the authors of their trouble: and were not only for returning into Egypt, but for stoning their deliverers. Those inclined to idolatry were displeased that their golden calf was destroyed. Many of the chiefs thought the new constitution might be injurious to their particular interests, that the profitable places would be engrossed by the families and friends of Moses and Aaron, and others equally well born excluded.t-In Josephus, and the Talmud, we learn some particulars, not so fully narrated in the Scripture. We are there told, "that Korah was ambitious of the priesthood; and offended that it was conferred on Aaron; and this, as he said, by the authority of Moses only, without the consent of the people. He accused Moses of having, by various artificers, fraudulently obtained the government, and deprived the people of their liber. ties; and of conspiring with Aaron to perpetuate the tyranny in their family. Thus, though Korah's real motive was the supplanting of Aaron, he persuaded the people that he meant only the public good: and they, moved by his insinuations, began to cry out,— Let us maintain the coinmon liberty of our respec we tribes; we have freed ourselves from the slavery

Numbers, chap. xiv.

Numbers, chap. xvi. ver. 3. "And they gathered themselves Logether against Moses and against Aaron, and said unto them, Ye take too much upon you, seeing all the congregation are holy, every one of them,-wherefore then lift ye up yourselves abuse the congregation ?"

imposed upon us by the Egyptians, and shall we Buffer ourselves to be made slaves by Moses? If we must have a master, it were better to return to Pharaoh, who at least fed us with bread and onions, than to serve this new tyrant, who by his operations has brought us in danger of famine.' Then they called in question he reality of his conferences with God; and objected to the privacy of the meeting, and the preventing any of the people from being present at the coiloquies, or even approaching the place, as rounds of great suspicion. They accused Moses also of peculation; as embezzling part of the golden spoons and the silver chargers, that the princes had offered at the dedication of the altar,* and the offerings of gold by the common people,+ as well as most of the poll-tax and Aaron they accused of pocketing much of the gold of which he pretended to have made a molten calf Besides peculation, they charg ed Moses with ambition; to gratify which passion, he had, they said, deceived the people, by promising to bring them to a land flowing with milk and honey: instead of doing which, he had brought them from such a land; and that he thought light of all this mischief, provided he could make himself an absolute prince. That to support the new dign'ty with splendour in his family, the partial poll-tax already levied and given to Aaro:¶ was to be followed by a general one,**which would probably be augmented from ime to time, if he were suffered to go on promulgat ng new laws on pretence of new occasional revelaions of the Divine will, till their whole fortunes were devoured by that aristocracy."

Numbers, chap. vii.

Exodus chap. xxxv. ver. 22.

Numbers, chap. ii. and Exodus, chap. xxx.

Nimber, chap. xvi. ver. 13. "Is it a small thing that thoo hast brought us up out of a land flowing with milk and honey, to kill us in this willen nem, except that thou make thyself altogether ● prince over us !"

Timbers, chap. 101.

**Exodus, chap. zzz

« ZurückWeiter »