25.-JEALOUSY. I do mistrust thee, woman! and each word Thee from the flames, which better far-but-no- 26.-COURAGE. He read their thoughts-they were his own— "What! while our arms can wield these blades, Shall we die tamely? die alone? Without one victim to our shades, One Moslem heart, where, buried deep, Tell of the Gueber's bloody glen! Who sinks entombed in Moslem dead!" 27.-LOVE. Strange! that one lightly-whispered tone Than all the sounds that kiss the earth But, lady, when thy voice I greet, I look upon the fair, blue skies, And naught but empty air I see; Ten thousand angels spread their wings 28.SCORN. Banished! I thank you for't. It breaks my chain! But here I stand and scoff you! here, I fling 29.-PROFOUND DESPAIR. No change, no pause, no hope! yet I endure! Eat with their burning cold into my bones : My heart; and shapeless sights come wandering by, 30.-PASSION. Passion, when deep, is still-the glaring eye, Its vengeance, are the language it employs. While passions glow, the heart, like heated steel, 31.-EXHORTATION. Rise, fathers, rise! 't is Rome demands your help; Or share their fate! The slain of half her senate Rouse up, for shame! Our brothers of Pharsalia 32. DESPAIR. But must I die here-in my own trap caught? And I'll redeem the past—undo the evil HOW TO CRITICISE THE ELOCUTION OF A READER OR SPEAKER. By committing the following questions thoroughly to memory, the reader, if he fully understands the rules and principles which have been discussed in this treatise, will be able to analyze and criticise fully and accurately, so far as relates to elocution, any reading or speaking performance to which he may listen. The plan is simple, yet, as far as it goes, perfectly adapted to the end in view. Each question suggests the proper answer, and the answer gives the information sought upon that particular point. The student ought, in this way, to criticise his own reading and speaking; and when the investigation results in the discovery of some defect in delivery, he should at once correct it. 1. Does he breathe naturally, and at proper intervals, as he proceeds in his discourse? If not, in what respect does he fail to observe the necessary conditions? 2. Is his voice clear, pure, full, resonant, and agreeable? 3. Is his articulation distinct and accurate, without being unnecessarily precise? If not, what are his faults? 4. Does he open his mouth wide enough to give full effect to the words uttered, without going to the extreme of mouthing? 5. Does he modulate his voice correctly as relates to pitch, or does he habitually speak in the same key? 6. Does he speak in too high or in too low a pitch? 7. Does he indulge in unbecoming transitions in pitch, as by changing too suddenly or too frequently from a very low and subdued to a very high and loud tone? 8. Does he employ the different forms of stress with suitable variety and proper effect? 9. Has he a good command of the swell, medium, the intermittent, and of the explosive, radical stress? 10. Does he manage the voice with taste and judgment in modulating it to suit the sentiment? 11. Does he employ too much force or not enough? 12. Does he give proper quantity to the open vowel sounds, the nasals, and liquids, without letting them run into a singing or drawling or an artificial tone? 13. Does he terminate sentences and passages in which the sense is complete with a correct and pleasing cadence? 14. Does he mark his parentheses, paragraphs, and changes of subjects by proper changes in pitch, force, stress, quantity, quality, and movement? 15. Does he speak too fast, or too slow, or has he uniformly about the same rate of utterance? 16. In interrogation, does he look and speak as if he were really asking a question and felt interested in the answer he might receive? 17. In narration, are his looks, tone, and manner, such as you can conceive they would be were he relating some part of his own experience? 18. When he attempts a description does he proceed as though he had himself seen, heard, felt, or in any way known that which he tries to describe? 19. In didactic discourse is his manner colloquial and familiar, as though he were actually engaged in imparting instruction? 20. Does he bring out the meaning of the author from whom he reads, or express his own sentiments in an elegant, forcible, clear, impressive, and appropriate manner? 21. Do his tone and manner indicate that he understands |