 | Leonard MacNally - 1802 - 316 Seiten
...jurifdiction is evidence of any matter which came collaterally in queCtion, though within their jurifdiction ; nor of any matter incidentally cognizable; nor of any matter to be inferred by argument by the judgment. Upon the fubject of marriage, the fpiritual court has the fole and exclufive cognizance... | |
 | Thomas Peake - 1804 - 534 Seiten
...jurifdietion is evidence of any matter which came collaterally in queftion, though within their jurifdiclion; nor of any matter incidentally cognizable; nor of any matter to be inferred by argument from the judgment. Judgments which are merely on queftions of property between party and party are, as A^e,... | |
 | Robert Joseph Pothier - 1806 - 728 Seiten
...jurifdidtion is evidence of any matter which came collaterally in queftion, though within their jurifdiction, nor of any matter incidentally cognizable, nor of any matter to be inferred by argument by the judgment. It was alfo the opinion of the judges, that, fuppofing the fcntence to be conclufive... | |
 | Sir John Joseph Dillon - 1811 - 214 Seiten
...directly upon the point, is conclusive 44 upon the same matter between the same parties, E 2 " coming incidentally in question in another " Court for a...purpose. But neither the " judgment of a concurrent nor exclusive juris" diction, is evidence of any matter to be infer" red by argument from that judgment"... | |
 | Samuel March Phillipps - 1815 - 600 Seiten
...different purpose : but that the judgment either of a court of concurrent or exclusive jurisdiction is not evidence of any matter, which came collaterally in...nor of any matter to be inferred by argument from the judgment. (2) But, although such sentences are conclusive, and cannot be impeached from within,... | |
 | 1816 - 742 Seiten
...upon the point, is, in like manner, conclusive upon the same matter, between the same parties, coming incidentally in question in another court, for a different...nor of any matter to be inferred by argument from the judgment. Upon the subject of marriage, the Spiritual Court has the sole and exclusive cognizance... | |
 | Samuel March Phillipps - 1816 - 746 Seiten
...different purpose ; but that the judgment either of a court of concurrent or exclusive jurisdiction is not evidence of any matter, which came collaterally in question, though within their )iiri«dicfion, nor of any matter incidentally cognizable, nor of any matter to be inferred by argument... | |
 | United States. Circuit Court (1st Circuit), John Gallison - 1817 - 624 Seiten
...upon the point, is, in like manner, conclusive upon the same matter, between the same parties, coming incidentally in question in another court for a different...concurrent or exclusive jurisdiction is evidence of any Harvey vs. Richards. matter, which came collaterally in question, though within their jurisdiction,... | |
 | Francis Buller - 1817 - 684 Seiten
...between the same partics coming incidentally in question in another court for a different purpose, yet neither the judgment of a concurrent or exclusive...collaterally in question, though within their jurisdiction, nur of any matter incidentally cognizable, nor of any matter to be inferred by agreement from the judgment.... | |
 | William Cruise - 1818 - 648 Seiten
...the point, is, in like manner, conclusive., upon the same matter, between the same parties, coming incidentally in question in another court for a different...nor of any matter to be inferred by argument from the judgment." These rules are laid down with so much precision and accuracy, that there is not a word... | |
| |
But neither the judgment of a concurrent or exclusive jurisdiction is evidence of any matter which came collaterally in question, though within their jurisdiction, nor of any matter incidentally cognizable, nor of any matter to be inferred by argument... 
