 | Great Britain. Court of Exchequer, Edward Younge, Sir John Jervis - 1830 - 614 Seiten
...on the llth May, obtained a rule to shew cause why a new trial should not be granted of the issue, on the grounds that the verdict was contrary to the evidence, and given through mistake and surprise, and against the opinion of the learned Judge, who, on the trial,... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of Common Pleas, John Scott - 1836 - 922 Seiten
...occasion with bona fides. A verdict having been returned for the plaintiff— £>'. />'. Harrison now moved for a new trial, on the grounds that the verdict was against the evidence, and that the testimony of the clerk had been improperly rejected.—The act of... | |
 | Arkansas. Supreme Court - 1841 - 662 Seiten
...mentioned in the evidence. Thomison they found not guilty. The defendants Ballard, Mitchell, and Hill, then moved for a new trial, on the grounds that the verdict was contrary to evidence; that the court refused to permit the jury first to find as to Thomisou ; that the finding... | |
 | Otis Allen - 1845 - 506 Seiten
...jury found a verdict for the plaintiff, seven hundred and fifty dollars damages. The defendant now moved for a new trial on the grounds that the verdict was against law and evidence, and the damages excessive. The facts as reported by Judge Brackenridge, were... | |
 | Arkansas. Supreme Court - 1859 - 738 Seiten
...must prove the contract as alleged. The jury found a verdict in favor of the plaintiff; the defendant moved for a new trial on the grounds that the verdict was contrary to evidence and the charge of the Court; the motion was overruled, and the defendant appealed. It is insisted... | |
 | Arkansas. Supreme Court - 1858 - 764 Seiten
...defendant." TERM, 1858.] Wilcox vs. Boothe. * The jury returned a verdict for the defendant. The plaintiff moved for a new trial on the grounds, that the verdict was contrary to law and evidence, and that the Court erred in giving the instructions to the jury. The Court overruled... | |
 | Arkansas. Supreme Court - 1877 - 810 Seiten
...said order was contrary to law, they will acquit." The jury rendered a verdict of acquittal, the State moved for a new trial, on the' grounds that the verdict was contrary to law and evidence, and the court erred in giving the third instruction asked for defendant. The motion... | |
 | Arkansas. Supreme Court - 1846 - 628 Seiten
...immediately follows a similar statement, dated 30th June, 1843. , On the first day of July, the plaintiff moved for a new trial, on the grounds that the verdict was contrary to evidence — verdict and judgnwnt contrary to law — and that improper evidence was intro* Thorn M.... | |
 | Arkansas. Supreme Court - 1853 - 926 Seiten
...in the Circuit Court, verdict and judgment in favof of Hichox for the amount of the account. Hearshy moved for a new trial on the grounds that the verdict was contrary to law and evidence, which was overruled and he excepted, and took a bill of exceptions, setting out the... | |
 | Arkansas. Supreme Court - 1851 - 860 Seiten
...plaintiffs, and judgment rendered against defendant and his security in the appeal. Defendant filed a motion for a new trial, on the grounds that the verdict was contrary to law and evidence, which was overruled. Pending the trial he took a bill of exceptions to decisions... | |
| |
Respondent moved for a new trial on the grounds that the verdict was contrary to the weight of the evidence, that it was a compromise verdict, and that the damages allowed were inadequate. 
