 If A. starts a hare in the ground of B, and hunts it into the ground of C, and kills it there, the property is in A, the hunter; but A. is liable to an action of trespass for hunting in the grounds as well of B. as of C.  The New sporting magazine - Seite 1711842Vollansicht - Über dieses Buch
 | Great Britain. Court of King's Bench, Robert Raymond Baron Raymond - 1790 - 834 Seiten
...continues all the *hile in B, But if j£ (tarts a hare in the ground of B. and hunts it into the ground of C. and kills it there, the property is in A, the hunter 5 but A. is liable to an a&ion of trefpafs for hunting in the grounds as well of B. as of C. But if... | |
 | William Selwyn - 1812 - 732 Seiten
...while in B. ; but if A. start a hare in the ground of B., and hunt it into the ground of C., and kill it there, the property is in A., the hunter; but A....for hunting in the grounds as well of B. as of C." And Chambre J. thought that this evidence sufficiently established the plaintiff's property in the... | |
 | Joseph Chitty - 1812 - 760 Seiten
...(a), Lord Holt said, " If A. starts a hare in the ground of •• B. and hunts it into the ground of C. and kills it " there, the property is in A. the hunter ; but A. is lia" ble to an action of trespass for hunting in the grounds " as well of B. as of C." But the distinction... | |
 | William Selwyn - 1817 - 782 Seiten
...while in B. ; but if A. start a hare in the ground of B., and hunt it into the ground of C., and kill it there, the property is in A., the hunter, but A....liable to an action of trespass for hunting in the ground, as well of B. as C*. Trespass for a dead hare the property of plaintiff. — The plaintifl',... | |
 | Edward Christian - 1817 - 374 Seiten
...ground of B, and hunt it into the ground of C, and kill it there, the property is in A the hunter, and A is liable to an action of trespass for hunting in the grounds as well of B as of C. But if A start a hare, &c. in a forest or warren of B, and hunt it into the ground of C, and there... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of King's Bench, Charles Durnford - 1817 - 872 Seiten
...Holt said, « If A. start a hare in «« the ground of S. and hunt it into the ground of C. and kill it « there, the property is in A . the hunter ; but A. is liable to an " action of trespass for bunting in the grounds as well of B. at "ofC" But the distinction which maybe attempted to be taken... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of King's Bench, Charles Durnford, Sir Edward Hyde East - 1817 - 870 Seiten
...Lord Holt said, " If A. start a hare in " the ground of B. and hunt it into the ground of C. and kill it «' there, the property is in A. the hunter ; but A. is liable to an «c action of trespass for hunting in the grounds as -well of S. & " of C" But the distinction which... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of Common Pleas, William Pyle Taunton - 1819 - 766 Seiten
...cases : in Suttott v. Moody : " If A. starts a hare in the ground of B., and hunts it into the ground of C., and kills it there, the property is in A. the hunter." This is stated as text law in Blockstands Commentaries (a), and finally confirmed in Churchward v.... | |
 | 1827 - 514 Seiten
...continues all the while in B. But if A. starts a hare in the ground of B., and hunts it into the ground of C., and kills it there, the property is in A. the...for hunting in the grounds as well of B. as of C." But these two propostions can scarcely be both true. Suppose the first to be true, what is the reason... | |
 | William Selwyn - 1827 - 834 Seiten
...start a hare in the ground of B., and hunt it into the ground of C., and kill it there, the property \s in A., the hunter, but A. is liable to an action of trespass for hunting in the ground, as well of B. as C.* Trespass for a dead hare, the property of plaintiff. — The plaintiff,... | |
| |
