Abbildungen der Seite
PDF
EPUB
[ocr errors]

"Holy Scripture," our author declares, "is

part of the deposit which, Rome tells us, Religion und Mythologie der alten Aegypter.

was committed to her charge, to be faithfully
guarded and infallibly expounded. At a time
when, through the mistakes of theologians, the
gress of science was apparently threatening
the authority of Scripture, when Rome, at any
rate, thought that authority was threatened, it
as surely important, if she spoke at all, that
she should speak the truth; if she interposed
at all, that she should take the right side, and
with a view of the matter that would prevent
the possibility of a conflict. Instead of doing so,
she confirmed the mistakes of her theologians;
the put forward, as God's Word, what was then
a doubtful, and what we now know was a false,
interpretation of the same; and she proceeded
on & principle that events have shown would
lead inevitably to the very collision she dreaded."
We may conclude our quotations with a

Nach den Denkmälern bearbeitet von

Heinrich Brugsch. Part I. (Leipzig,
Hinrichs.)

the essence of the matter.

When the

Egyptian spoke of "God" (without mention

this or that quality or attribute, there is no ing any name) doing this or that, or having doubt that he, like the Greeks and other

nations, approached very near our idea of God. Some of the passages which Dr. Brugsch translates will be interesting to the general student of Bible history, for in them he will recognize the Hebrew description of Adonai; but the learned German has forgotten to state that the same things are said of other gods. We quote a few of the passages:

In spite of the large number of publications on Egyptian matters which have issued from English, French, and German presses during the last few years, it has been impossible to get any really good account of the mythology and religion of the Egyptians until very recently. It is quite true that individual experts have had their own ideas as to the doctrines and dogmas of the religion of the ancient Egyptians; but they have not written them down. To make a book on, or an account of, the Egyptian religion is by no means an easy task. To do so the mythology and beliefs of the Egyptians as a whole must be series of inferences drawn out by Mr. | known, and, moreover, attention must be and has been from the beginning. He is the Roberts-inferences many of which may paid to the development of new beliefs and seem but truisms to most of our readers, the decay of old ones, which inevitably take but which are remarkable indeed, considerplace in all religions. It must never be ing their author, and the careful and ela-imagined for a moment that the Egyptian borate way in which he has established and fenced round with arguments every one religion remained stationary. Evolution was going on perpetually. The great storehouse of the series. They are as follows:of mythological and religious texts is, of "Decrees confirmed by, and virtually in- course, the Ritual of the Dead,' and cluded in, a Bull addressed to the Universal this work, together with the variant readChurch, may be, not only scientifically false, but, ings of it, must form the base of any sound lated to prejudice the cause of religion...... In work on the subject. When the late Dr. other words, the Pope, in and by a Bull ad- Lepsius published a copy of it from the dressed to the whole Church, may confirm and Turin papyrus, he considered this latter approve, with Apostolic authority, decisions to be a moderately correct version. It has, that are false and perilous to the faith. however, been found that there are more "Decrees of the Apostolic See and of recensions than one of the 'Ritual.' Dr. Pontifical Congregations may be calculated to Lepsius himself published some chapters impede the free progress of science.

:

calcu

The Pope's infallibility is no guarantee that he may not use his supreme authority to indoctrinate the Church with erroneous opinions, through the medium of Congregations he has erected to assist him in protecting the Church from error.

"The Pope, through the medium of a Pontifical Congregation, may require, under pain of exostimunication, individual Catholics to yield an absolute assent to false, unsound, and dangerous propositions......

"It does not follow, from the Church's having been informed that the Pope has ordered Catholic to abjure an opinion as a heresy, that the opinion is not true and sound......

Are not all these propositions irreconcilable ith Ultramontane principles? If so, can it be nied that those principles are as false as it is true that the earth moves?"

The matter of this book is, indeed, as we have said, remarkable, but its manner is also much to be commended. Temperate courteous, it is devoid of that most stable thing the odium theologicum. It calmly and closely reasoned as if it were concerned rather with purely physical th than with the relation of one such rath to the most powerful opposition it all possibly encounter. The book is a ery treasure-house of telling arguments only against Ultramontanism pure (or ether impure) and simple (or rather wily), against the whole anti-scientific spirit those who think that the cause of religion be promoted by the suppression of any The work of this priest should be the hands not only of every clergyman, in the hands of every one likely to be alled upon to do good service in the never ing battle between those who love the ght and those who obstinately cling to disproved theories and opinions.

as

[ocr errors]

which he considered older than the re-
cension copied on the Turin papyrus,
which contains 165 chapters; but many
of the chapters which it omits are as old
any known.
Within the last few
years the texts engraved on the pyramids
of Unas, Teta, and Pepi have been pub-
lished by Maspero in the Recueil, and these
exhibit probably the oldest form of the
Ritual.' By a comparison of all the recensions
of the 'Ritual' known at present it is perfectly
easy to see that the mythology of the Egyp-
tians did change, that new forms and new
ideas arose, and that the gods of an older
period were superseded by others in later
days.

Dr. Brugsch in the first part of the
first half of his work on the religion and
mythology of the ancient Egyptians treats
of the mythology in general, and discusses
the methods by which we obtain our know
ledge of it from what he terms the theo-
logical, mystical, and mythical language and
writing. His explanations of the names of
gods are exceedingly good, although other
scholars hold different opinions on some of
these points. As to the idea of One God in-
comprehensible and eternal, we do not think
it ever existed among the ancient Egyptians.
The passages which Dr. Brugsch quotes to
prove his theory can be quite as easily
understood to apply to any of the gods of
the Egyptian Pantheon as to one. At the
same time, when he says that the word for
god, nutar", "indicates the operative power
which creates and produces things in periodic
recurrence, grants them new life, and restores
the vigour of their youth," he describes the
meaning of this word admirably. Mr.
Renouf in his Hibbert Lectures Faid the
word meant "power," and this is, of course,

"God is the only One, and Alone, and none other is with Him. God is the One who has made all. God is a spirit, a hidden spirit, the spirit of spirits, the great spirit of the Egyptians, the divine spirit. God is from the beginning, primeval one, and existed when as yet there was nothing. He existed when as yet there was nothing, and after He was He created what God is the eternal: He is everlasting and withnow exists. He is the father of beginnings. out end, perpetual and everlasting. God is hidden, and no one has learnt his form. No one has sought out his likeness, He is hidden with respect to gods and men, a secret is He for his creatures. God is the truth, He lives through truth, He nourishes Himself upon truth, He rests upon truth, He creates truth. God begets, and is not begotten. He gives birth, but is not given birth to. He produces Himself and gives birth to Himself. He is the creator of his form and the sculptor of his body."

The remainder of the first part of Dr. Brugsch's book is occupied by his account of the mythology of the Egyptians. He treats of their view of the cosmogony, the primeval chaos; then follow his ideas of the ogdoad and of the gods who composed it. Throughout the book small figures indicating notes, we suppose are scattered, and it is much to be regretted that the author did not cite his authorities and references at the foot of each page, so that the reader and student might be able to control his statements. We remember that many years ago Dr. Brugsch published translations of some parts of the 'Ritual' or 'Book of the Dead' second part, giving the explanations, has not with similar figures; so far as we know, the yet appeared. We hope that a similar fate may not befall the second part of the work which is now under consideration. We are sorry to see that so many of the conclusions obtained by Mr. Renouf and other Egyptologists are entirely disregarded, and also. that ideas which they have long given up. as hopelessly impossible are retained. Dr.. Brugsch's theory that the Egyptian religion of the latest times is identical with that of the earliest is both absolutely wrong and impossible, and it is this idea which vitiates most of his conclusions. The next thing, then, to be done is to wait for the appearance of the second part of Religion und Mythologie,' that we may see what are the final views of this indefatigable worker on these subjects.

The Life and Times of Colonel Fred Burnaby. By J. Redding Ware and R. K. Mann. (Field & Tuer.)

Ir may be taken as good evidence of the genuineness of Col. Burnaby's life and chaBacter that the authors of this little book with a pretentious title have failed to make

him ridiculous. It would have been a matter of regret if they had succeeded, for he was a typical representative of qualities, never very common, which are still popular with Englishmen, and in virtue of which he performed some rare and difficult feats. But his memory has had a narrow escape, for his biographers are sadly lacking in the sense of proportion, and display besides that absence of humour which is sometimes an abounding cause of mirth in others. Their acquaintance with the English language is also imperfect. And yet, thanks mainly to a free and on the whole judicious choice of extracts from his writings and speeches, they have produced, as we gladly admit, a fairly clear and intelligible portrait. Their attitude towards their hero, if sometimes a little perplexing, is candid, and by no means that of indiscriminate admiration. Thus they are much exercised by the want of direct evidence of religious feeling, and the difficulty becomes acute when they proceed to draw a comparison between Burnaby and Gordon. As regards contempt of danger and fertility of resource the comparison will hold. For the rest they are reduced to quoting a direction given by Burnaby for balloonists in certain very critical circumstances, to "trust to Providence and the chapter of accidents."

"The quotation here made is interesting, as containing one of the very few references to Providence throughout the whole of Burnaby's published works. Indeed, even here not too much weight need be given to it, for it is immediately modified by the chapter of accidents.'"

The whole of the passage they quote, describing the difficulties connected with a balloon descent, is good and characteristic, but we should not have thought of extracting a profession of faith from it. But the authors' forte is distinctly the drawing of large conclusions from very small premises. Burnaby was crossing from Calais to Dover: "Two fellow - travellers,' he says, 'whose acquaintance I had made in the train, were talking to the sailors.' [The hidden meaning here lies in the italicized words.] Here, then, at forty years of age, may Burnaby be found just as he had lived at twenty-enjoying existence like the boy, from many points of view, he remained all his life. Neither the approach of

middle age nor the first attacks of a merciless disease had in any way stilled that ardent heart or silenced the cheery inquiring tongue."

When the Montgolfier balloon ascended from Cremorne the Daily Telegraph called for a volunteer, and found one in the person of a young man in bad health and recklessly anxious to distinguish himself. Burnaby, who leaped in at the last moment-nearly wrecking the ascent, which was dangerous enough as it was—became fast friends with the correspondent. This was not very wonderful, but his biographers mention as a touching proof of his capacity for friendship that, in spite of the difference of position between the two men, Burnaby could write eighteen years after this expedition of "my friend, the late Mr. Prowse." Several curious expressions occur in the book. A reader ignorant of recent geography, being told of the "bronchial affection from which he suffered severely for several years before he found ultimate relief at Abu Klea," might naturally suppose that the reference was to a watering-place.

On his last start for the Soudan, wishing to avoid notice, for fear of detention by the authorities,

"he slipped off without saying 'good-bye openly to any one. At his house they tell how he said to Robert [Lady Whitshed's footman], 'Good-bye; I shan't come back,' or 'I may not come back.'......The valediction is a final instance of Burnaby's implacable friendship in his treat

ment of the humbler folk about him"!

This must be our final quotation of the absurdities scattered throughout the book. But it is only fair to add that the interesting matter predominates. Burnaby was a man who deserved a memoir. Without being exactly a many-sided man, he did several things, and did them well. He had not merely an enthusiasm for ballooning, but an extensive practical acquaintance with the subject. Not many men could have successfully taken the Ride to Khiva, and still fewer could have described it so well. His still more dangerous defiance of the Russians at Plevna and his defiance of the Radicals of Birmingham were equally characteristic. All these things are more or less efficiently treated in the book before us.

According to his biographers he was suffering latterly from an advanced stage of heart and lung disease. His friends may therefore have the consolation of knowing that his life could not in any case have been much prolonged, while death came to him in the form which he probably would have chosen for himself.

The Literature of the French Renaissance: an Introductory Essay. By Arthur Tilley, Fellow and Tutor of King's College, Cambridge. (Cambridge, University Press.)

IT is a pity that when Mr. Tilley decided upon publishing by itself the introduction to his contemplated work on the Literature of the French Renaissance,' he did not to his contemplated work on the Literature choose a title which should at least indicate

the contents of the book. The present volume might be supposed to give a summary account of the literature of the French Re

Bu

lishes this compilation by itself. while Mr. Tilley's title is misleading to th reader, and his book is unfair to its autho it is not to be denied that his work forms well-arranged and compendious introductio to a history which we hope to have one day and we are grateful for what we have now The volume opens with two chapters o "The Renaissance in General" and "Th Renaissance in France," each of them a excellent example of the academical essay lucid, pleasantly written, and not too learned We are next introduced to the nativ mediæval literature of France and to the means of education afforded by the Univer sity of Paris and by the activity of the religious orders. Mr. Tilley then describes the political condition and relations of France at the close of the fifteenth century, the revival of classical studies, and the impulse added to their prosecution by the invention of printing. He concludes with a sketch of the immediate forerunners of the literary movement of the French Renaissance.

We may say at once that whatever Mr. Tilley writes about French literature-that is, about literature written in French-is evidently the fruit of solid and independent reading. His third and eighth chapters contain as intelligent and as interesting an account of the early history of that literature as could well be given within the narrow limits of some fifty pages. Mr. Tilley's grasp is less decided when he approaches subjects less immediately connected with his own studies. The history of the Middle Ages and the history of learning during that period he seems to know only through the common text-books, and of those not always the best text-books. But he not merely compiles; he generalizes on second-hand information which he does not always understand. Mr. Bryce's phrase "the Roman Renaissance," for the whole set of facts tha 1400, is no doubt capable of misconception make up the history of learning from 1100 to as if that set of facts was summed up in the but it is singular to find Mr. Tilley speaking commentators on the Roman law, in Dante Petrarch, and Boccaccio, and did not include the entire scholastic movement as well, though this was carefully mentioned by Mr Bryce, to whom he gives a general reference (Holy Roman Empire,' p. 241). It is stil more singular that Mr. Tilley should think it necessary to explain that "the actua Renaissance was born of Greece rather tha of Rome." Then, again, we are surprise to see how he treats the importance of Gree in the domain of theology. That Greek i essential to an exact knowledge of the Ner Testament is, of course, self-evident; bu Mr. Tilley dwells on the fact that "th greater and more important part of patristi literature is Greek." He does not seem to be aware that most of the Greek fathers of the first rank had been familiar to Wester scholars by means of Latin translations for centuries before the Renaissance; nor do we find that the Greek type of theological ex position exercised any remarkable influence upon Western thought after its origina opened to the world. The Latin tradition remained pre dominant in theology in spite even of the Protestant Reformation.

naissance, and to be modestly described as "an introductory essay" in comparison with some larger book, or books, on the same subject. But it is nothing of the sort. It is an introduction meant to be prefixed to a work which Mr. Tilley hopes one day to complete; and it is concerned not at all with the literature of the French Renaissance, but solely with the antecedents of that literature. To begin with, it is true, Mr. Tilley discusses the meaning and broad characteristics of the Renaissance, and defines the chronological limits of his projected work. But all the "literature" with which this volume is concerned is that of the Middle Ages. As an introductory section of a long history the book might do very well, but we cannot understand its raison d'être in a separate form. It is, in fact, a set of essays which require something else to support and justify them; it has neither the coherence nor the thoroughness necessary for an independent book. The writer of a substantial critical treatise may be allowed, perhaps, to compile his introduction without much minute or original investigation in fields which are not actually a part of his special study; Mr. Tilley is apt to confound two elements but it is quite another matter if he pub-in medieval culture which ought to be kept

sources had been once more

arefully distinct, namely, classical and theolegial learning. He talks of Abelard as though he were specially a classical scholar. As a matter of fact we should be inclined to ay that the rise of theological study was he principal cause of the decline of that lassical learning which had flourished so tably in the twelfth century. Mr. Tilley also seems to fall into that curious anahronism which in thought, if not in words, dentifies France with Paris. John of Salistury learned his classical scholarship not at Paris-tist had only dialectic and theology to offer-but at Chartres, which deserves a clearer recognition than it has generally received as the great home of humanism in the first half of the twelfth century. Mr. Tilley has naturally not recognized this fact, cause his information seems to be limited lmost entirely to the 'Histoire Littéraire e la France,' the earlier volumes of which, earned as they are, can only be accepted with the greatest caution. Perhaps, indeed, we ought not to find fault with Mr. Tilley For not knowing where to look for his materials in what is admittedly only an Entroduction to a future history; but, we repeat, by publishing this by itself Mr. Tilley has wilfully exposed himself to critiism, and it is with sincere regret that we And the substance of his introductory book to be in many ways so inferior in quality to what we expect to have in time to come. For whenever Mr. Tilley glances forward to the sixteenth century we find clear evidence of conscientious work and thoroughly competent scholarship.

RECENT VERSE.

The Poems of Francis Heywood Warden. With
a Notice by Dr. Vanroth. (Blackwood &
Sons.)

Sets By E. H. Brodie. (Bell & Sons.)
Forms and Fragments. By Charles James.

(Gardner.)
The Glasne Ballad Club: Ballads and Poems.
By Members of the Glasgow Ballad Club.
(Blackwood & Sons.)

In Cornwall and Across the Sea, with Poems
written in Devonshire. By Douglas B. W.
Sladen. (Griffith, Farran & Co.)

ME WARDEN's poems are introduced to the pubby a memoir from the pen of one Dr. Octavius ath, of which it cannot be said, as it is cusry to say of such compositions, that the editor rought love and sympathy to his task. The st editor disapproves of his poet both as and writer, though he allows him certain qualities. Here is a brief quotation : Mr. Warden, the selfishness (for I can use cther term) which dominated his character developed in a way which, if it left room for on his own account, yet did not require chers the reprobation usually attached to I do not wish to put forward a plea nba behalf before a tribunal to which he never ed; or to say anything in discharging my which would provoke, were he still living, ful repudiation. But, to render a just ent possible, I may observe that a suffiy high-if the reader pleases, an absurdly

erated-estimate of himself will sometimes a man to behave practically much as if he controlled by strict and lofty principle." Vanroth's sentences are at times so inred as to be almost incomprehensible. HowMr. Warden could have no reason for

paint, since we learn that he himself re

ed Dr. Vanroth to undertake the present
, though he knew at what variance he and
future editor were on most points.
The
is themselves are distinctly interesting and

are full of promise. They have none of that false ornamentation, that tinselly glitter, which verse from genuine distinguish counterfeit poetry. They show a mind strong, but embittered by adversity, a mind ever striving to penetrate the mystery which surrounds each life as a great waveless sea surrounds some forlorn little island which in time it will submerge. Take, for example, this bitter complaint of Swift at Moor Park,' which probably represents the writer's own feelings :

Ye ask why on my absent brow

The cloud of darkness oft descends?
Ye think I still should smile as now,

And that were merrier, fair my friends
After your ignorance ye err,
Who to that gloom this mirth prefer.
So questioned, I will give reply

Than your conjecture more exact,
Partly to check your curious eye,

And partly from authentic fact:
And if my laughter wakes the while,
Desire ye not that I should smile?
This from high Heaven I claim to know-
Who gave the right to place me here
A living man 'mid things of show,
In blinded lands a vision clear?
Never Oblivion sinned so deep.
'Twas just with this to break its sleep.
Were what the various earth affords

Of pomp and pleasure, made my own,
And master of victorious swords

I ruled supreme, could this atone
For all the undefeated ills
That fly not him who rules and kills?
Not less would everything I prized
To dream and dust and mockery turn;
The lips I loved would grow despised,
Hate of my flesh within me burn:
Too well the unfilled void I know
If all were given. It is not so.
The base necessities of life

Hem in my soul on every side,
And thrust me forward in a strife,

Where triumph's self were fallen pride:

I am encompassed night and day

By clamouring tongues, and blare and bray.

Some of the poems reveal a vein of weird fancy which recalls Poe-'The Cynic Amphitryon,' for instance:

I dwell in a desolate house

On the cliffs of a muttering sea, And oft, like wandering clouds, Spectral and sheeted crowds

Come in through the window and make carouse
In the dead night-watch with me.

And ever my head swims light,
Though my heart may stony be:

I arose and laughed and said,
"What matters alive or dead?

Ye are ten times ten, and I know not aright
How many to count for me.

"Tis sweet, the damp night air

And the ponderous roll of the sea;
These bowls ye have seen before,
Of the wine ye have ample store,
But drink yet again, and the fairest fair
Shall measure a dance with me."
The spectres gibbered and sang,

They locked their arms in glee:
"Now here," they cried, "is mirth,
And a wine that tastes of earth;
There is many a host that feasts our gang,
But never a one like thee."

Let them make a bold carouse,
My jest will merrier be;

For whenever I stamp my foot,
This rock shall cleave to the root,
And thundering down, restore the house
To the cold oblivious sea,

'Pre

studies, though written in rhymed verse. There are in the book some good dramatic sumption,' the story of the officer who was shot for deserting his post in a sudden paroxysm of terror and who yet died with unwavering firmness, is simply but powerfully told. The poem is too long to quote at length and would suffer from a mere extract. In spite of much that is crude there can be no doubt that, had Mr. Warden lived and received due encouragement, he would, in spite of his editor's strictures, have developed into a poet of marked and varied

powers.

Not the least remarkable feature of Mr.

Brodie's volume is his preface, in which he expounds his sonnets with that spirit of loving reverence noticeable in certain well- meaning persons who bring to light the literary indis

cretions of some defunct friend or relative. Mr.

Now

Brodie has travelled much, and he has recorded his impressions in a series of sonnets. when Wordsworth, whom Mr. Brodie loyally follows, did the same thing, failure was often

the result. The justification of this form of composition is one distinct clear cut idea, naturally dividing itself into octave and sestet. Places, therefore, as a rule, do not lend themselves to sonnet uses. Mr. Brodie fails to realize how much too much he writes. The best of his descriptive sonnets show accurate observation, good music, and a quick eye for picturesque effects. Take the following for example, though in this case the twelfth line as regards metrical expression is an exception :

WESTON-SUPER-MARE-EVENING.

How dull this day has been, but now behold
Under the distant headland's gloomy crest
Upon the hazy waters of the west

A crocus line of unexpected gold,

Which, as I gaze, the fanning airs unfold
Into broad ripples dancing in unrest,
Till to my very feet o'er ocean's breast

The vesper glory of the sun is rolled.
Welcome stray gleam of transitory light;
My mind was drear and vacant as the scene,

Like brooding eve anticipating night,

When the last half-hour only is between,
Welcome as some rich thought within the brain
That leads a thousand others in its train.

A few sonnets equally good are buried under a mass of others on places and persons, most of them wearisome and some singularly foolish. Here is one in its Wordsworthian baldness almost droll enough to be an Ingoldsby satire :

THE YARMOUTH FISHER-BOY.

"I like it not, but I must not complain."
So said the Yarmouth fisher-boy to me,
As on the pier we sat, and eyed the sea,
Now darkened with the transitory rain,
Now lighted by the fitful moon again:

Torn from his humble home full soon was he

In his first trial trip about to be

Schooled for eight weeks upon the tossing main.

I looked into his face, he into mine:

Nothing more innocent I ever saw,

And brave the aspect of the boy, if sad

Now prosper us waves and prosperous winds be thine, And full nets after her the cutter draw,

God ever with thee, gentle fisher-lad.

Mr. Brodie sometimes departs from the Italian form of sonnet, as in the following on Chaucer, the last two lines of which are perplexing :

CHAUCER.

Hail honoured sire of English poesy

Kind Chaucer of the arch and downcast look!
See from thy roots upsprung how fine a tree,
From thy fair preface what a goodly book!
Thou shouldst be heard, not read; it were a waste
Thy merry tales at secondhand to tell,

The fountain's freshness all who can should taste, Best water spoils in fetching from the well. Couldst thou come back with tender heart and true Still wouldst thou find in spite of time and change Those sights and sounds, the ever old and new, That lured thee so in spring abroad to range, The rose-tipped flower that shuts with eye of day How would she blush to hear again thy lay. In another instance Mr. Brodie expresses his desire to shine, however faintly, in what he calls the "poetic firmament." One can almost fancy such prolific sonneteers ordering their dinners in sonnet form. The less Mr. Brodie writes, short of not writing at all, the greater will be his chances of success.

Mr. James is a lugubrious bard. His first poem, written in blank verse, is entitled 'In a Village Churchyard.' On the whole, Gray's 'Elegy' is preferable, but Mr. James's poem is not without some fairly good lines, such as

[ocr errors]

these :

This one hath look'd on Death and never flinch'd;
Hath gone as gladly to those greedy arms
As to his mother's bosom, fearing none;
Hath ta'en farewell of life without a sigh.
Who's he that hath so strange a scorn of that
Which doth appal the valiantest ? A child!
One that, as seemeth from his epitaph,
Had tarried scarce three summers on the earth.
Strange doth it seem to meet thy childish form
Accoutr'd with the panoply of Death,

And burden'd with the honours of the grave. This is followed by 'The Wanderer's Funeral Hymn.' There are other pieces in the book of an equally dismal nature. The first production in the volume, though it says nothing particularly new, is by a long way the best thing in it.

That gentlemen of antiquarian tastes should beguile some of their leisure hours by the composition of poems in imitation of old ballads is no matter for surprise, but that they should give to the public the results of these amusements is perplexing. We learn that "the Glasgow Ballad Club was formed in 1876 for the study of ballads and ballad literature and for friendly criticism

of original ballads and poems contributed by the members." The volume contains a selection of these contributions from the formation of the club till the end of 1883. So much for the reader's information. One or two tolerably good contributions, like Mr. Fraser's 'Ballad of Buchan,' may be spoken of with favour; but if we are to suppose that only the best contributions have been selected, it would be hard, looking at the book as a whole, to conjecture what the worst can have been.

Mr. Sladen has published two volumes of verse which have shown some little amount of fancy. His last effort, however, is worthless. It is difficult to imagine how any one knowing Mr. R. S. Hawker's impressive poem The Silent Tower of Bottreaux' should venture to give a second version of the same subject, yet | this is what Mr. Sladen has done, and this is the kind of way in which he has done it. We quote the closing lines:

[merged small][ocr errors]

From their belfry in the sunken ship,
The danger to foretell,

When from the far Atlantic

There strides a sudden swell.
And the fishers of the haven,

Though smooth as glass the sea,
And though the heavens overheard [sic]
From rack or cloud are free,
Though breeze enough there is not
A signal flag to see,

If they think they hear the knelling
Of the Forrabury bells,

Bay 'tis the scornful captain who

A coming storm foretells,

And he his boat who launches
Hears his own funeral knells.

But the bells of high Tintagel
Still merrily ring on,

As, long ere Norman William came,
They haughtily have done,
While the bells of Forrabury

Were not, have come, have gone. One would not think the ballad form suited to elegiac ends, yet to these ends Mr. Sladen has put it. The sonnets are perhaps the feeblest things in the volume, but where all is poor it is difficult to say.

OUR LIBRARY TABLE. MESSRS. HODDER & STOUGHTON send us a handsome volume, obviously of American manufacture, containing George Eliot's Poetry, and Other Studies, by Miss R. E. Cleveland, sister

These

of the President of the United States. papers seem to have been originally written as lectures, and no doubt pleased the audiences for whom they were intended, but the wisdom of their publication in book form may be doubted.

A Rainy June, by Ouida (Maxwell), has one great point of superiority over most of Ouida's writings in that the story, such as it is, is told without much unnecessary verbiage. To be sure, it is only the history of the honeymoon (spent in a dull country house) of an Italian nobleman and an English girl, whom he has married after a few weeks' acquaintance. The story is told in the form of letters passing between the "parties" and their friends, and it would not be difficult for any one acquainted with Ouida's system of ethics to reconstruct it. Of course it is all profoundly unsatisfactory; and the reader is left at the end with a pretty plain hint of impending adultery. So far as the story has any purpose, it may be presumed to be the illustration, by means of an extreme case, of the old adage "Marry in haste, repent at leisure." Whether there was any demand for another story on this theme may be doubted. In one point Ouida is quite herself. She has made more mistakes in French and Italian words than can often have been got into a similar number of pages, and she (or the printer) has discovered a new way of misspelling "Psyche."

To the general reader the history of Japan up to the year 1868 presents few features of interest.

Wight. We are glad to see these handy ma are growing in favour with tourists.

THE Autotype Company has produced fo C. P. Johnson a facsimile of the interesting he unearthed some months ago, that fo the first instalment of Sketches by of which no second seems to have ever issued. Mr. Johnson commented on the m in the Athenæum of April 4th, and he cert seems to be right in attributing the drawing letterpress to Thackeray. Collectors of early performances of Michael Angelo Titi should, therefore, secure this facsimile.

WE have on our table The Literary Rea

of the late Henry James, edited by W. J. (Trübner),-Harriet Martineau, by Mrs. wick Miller (Allen & Co.),- Burma and Burmans, by A. R. Colquhoun (Field & Tu -Die Karavane, by W. Hauff, edited, v Notes, by A. Schlottmann (Cambridge, Univer Press),-Meister Martin, der Küfner, und Gesellen, by E. T. Hoffmann, edited by F. La (Symons),-Gai Iuli Cæsaris de Bello Gallico, Notes by A. G. Peskett (Cambridge, Unive Press),―The Educational List and Director 1885 (Evans),-Materials for Object Lessons C. McRae (Chambers),-- The Pocket Hotel D

The native annals are at once meagre and redundant, full of unimportant details, recording prodigies and omens, while they pass by the real events that make the flesh and bone of history with the barest mention. For the last thousand years they may be trusted for dates and names; they can be trusted for little else. The history of Old Japan should be treated on a much larger scale than that adopted by Mr. Thorpe in his History of Japan (White & Co.) or compressed into a couple of chapters. Dai Nippon has had no influence upon the world's fortunes, no share in shaping the destinies of men. Her history is parochial; specialists only are ever likely to study it, and specialists will derive no aid from Mr. Thorpe's book, the pages of which are plentifully sown with errors of a kind denoting both ignorance of native literature and careless compilation from the papers and translations of Mr. Satow and Mr. Aston. Neither Dr. Dickson's history nor the more recent one of Mr. Adams is at all likely to be superseded by the present work, the most interesting portions of which are the chapter dealing with the Satsuma rebellion-in part a précis, in part a reproduction, of the late Mr. Mounsey's too little known and very valuable record of that curious episode of modern Japanese history-and the appendix on the new orders of nobility, containing the sub-tory (Mackenzie),—Hints for Invalids and stance of an article on the subject published in vellers, by T. E. Maclean (Lewis), the columns of the London and China Telegraph lines of Psychology (New York, Phillips Hunt),-The Fundamental Science, by H in September, 1884. Mr. Aston's researches, Clarke (Kegan Paul),, Report of the t States Commission on Fish and Fisheries for (Washington, Government Printing Office Observations on the Efficient Valuation of Frie Societies, by F. G. P. Nelson (Harrison), Secret of the North, by F. Mackintosh (Wym -A Woman's Love Story, by the Author 'Garden of Eden' (W. Stevens), - I Humoresques! a Series of Character Sketches j the Law Courts, in Six Sheets, drawn by Bryan S. Blanchard, &c. (Kingston-on-Thar Hogg),—Amateur Tommy Atkins, by S. I shaw (Field & Tuer), - Blind Jem and Fiddle, by M. E. Palgrave (S.P.C.K.), Manborough Choir Boys (S.P.C.K.),- Thr the Waters (S.P.C. K.),—The Training of Chil by W. Booth (Salvation Army Book Sto -Speedwell (Marcus Ward),-Gordon Anec by Dr. Macaulay (R. T.S.),-Wesley Anex by J. Telford (R.T.S.), and Darkness Dawn (Kegan Paul).

too, it should be added, have enabled the author to give a fuller and more accurate account of the doings of Hideyoshi and of the relations of Japan with Korea in the sixteenth century than is to be met with out of the pages of the Transactions of the Asiatic Society of Japan.

ALTHOUGH the New Code itself is clearly arranged, and presents but few difficulties to the veteran schoolmaster or school manager, it does no doubt somewhat puzzle an inexperienced person, and Mr. J. F. Moss has published an edition for 1885 of his Handbook of the New Code (Cassell & Co.), which will prove useful to beginners in school work. The notes appended when necessary to the articles of the code are clear and long enough without being too long, and contain much valuable information extracted from official circulars, minutes, and correspondence. The second part of the handbook contains "hints for the guidance of school managers and correspondents," official circulars, regulations, schedules, and the like, which have been from time to time issued by the Education Department for the enlightenment of those interested in public elementary instruction. The perusal of this second part we cordially recommend to school managers and teachers.

LIST OF NEW BOOKS. ENGLISH. Theology.

Doudney's (D. A.) For Ever with Jesus, cr. 8vo, 35 el. Middlemist's (F. J.) Sermons preached in a Village Ch 12mo. 2,6 cl.

Poetry.

Barlow's (G.) Loved beyond Words, Poems, cr. 8vo. 2,6 Burn's (P.) Poems, cr. 8vo. 6/ cl.

Music. Prentice's (R.) The Musician, Grade 4, imp. 16mo. 2/c History and Biography. Griffith (W.), Memorials and Letters, cr. 8vo. 3 cl. Recollections of the Reign of Terror, by a Country edited by Baron Ernouf, translated from French Abbé Dumesnil by J. C. Brogan, cr. 8vo. 2 6 el. Philology. Macmillan's Latin Course, First Year, by A. M. Cook, Science. Fox's (E. L.) Influence of the Sympathetic on Disease, Kane's (W. F. de V.) European Butterflies, cr. 8vo, le Low's (S.) Sanitary Suggestions, 8vo. 2/6 el. Wardell's (J. R.) Contributions to Pathology and the Pr of Medicine, roy. 8vo. 21/ el. Ziemssen's (Von) Handbook of General Therapeutics, 8vo. 18/ cl. General Literature. Clifford's (Mrs. W. K.) Mrs. Keith's Crime, cr. 8vo. 6/ Commonplace Sinners, 2 vols. cr. 8vo. 21/ el. Elliott's (R.) Fought and Won, a Story of GrammarLife, cr. 8vo. 2/6 cl.

GUIDE-BOOKS accumulate on our table. Among the best are Mr. C. E. Black's admirable guides, Lyall's (C. J.) Translations of Ancient Arabian Poetry, North France exclusive of Paris and South France (Black). These volumes enjoy a deserved popularity. The descriptions are clear and concise, the directions accurate; the information about trains, hotels, diligences, is, so far as we have tested it, very good; and the maps are abundant and excellent. In this respect these books are conspicuously superior to their English rivals. Mr. Black makes a mistake, we think, in including Florence and Genoa in his guide to South France. He should produce a separate new book to North Italy. From Messrs. A. & C. Black we have also received a greatly improved edition of O'Shea's Guide to Spain. Mr. Lomas, who has revised the book, has done his work admirably, and has embodied the fruits of his own personal experience with tact and care. We should suggest the improvement of the introductory sections; that on Spanish literature especially is not worthy of the volume. -We have also on our table two penny Holiday Handbooks, by Mr. Percy Lindley. -Mr. Stanford has sent us second editions of Mr. Worth's capital Guide to Somersetshire and Mr. Bevan's Guide to Hampshire and the Isle of

Gough's (J. B.) Platform Echoes, 8vo. 5/ cl.
Greg's (P.) The Verge of Night, 3 vols. cr. 8vo. 31/6 cl.
Hayward's (W. 8.) One in a Thousand, 12mo. 2/ bds.
Hope's (Right Hon. A. J. B. Beresford) Strictly Tied U
Hugo's (V.) History of a Crime, translated by T. H.
and A. Locker, 12mo. 2/ bds.

Hugo's (V.) Outlaw of Iceland, a Romance, translated
G. Campbell, cr. 8vo. 2/6 cl.

My Friends' Birthdays, printed in Seven Colours, 18m Peard's (Mrs. F. M.) Near Neighbours, cr. 8vo. 6/ cl.

Rebellion and Loyalty, or the Two Thrones, 8vo. 2,6 cl.

[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]

WILL

THE BATTLE OF BRUNNANBURH.

Mill Hill, August 4, 1885.

you allow me space to propound very rietly a solution of an historical problem that as hitherto been given up as insoluble? It is ix (approximately) the spot where the famous attle of Brunnanburh was fought.

According to the authorities that have left us details concerning the reign of Athelstan, this king met and defeated at Brunnanburh Olaf (or Anlaf, King of the Danes, together with his uxiliaries Constantine, King of the Scots, and umerous unnamed Welsh princes. Now, by Eests here is most probably meant Irish, and tree out of the four MSS. of the A.-S. Chrole edited by Thorpe mention Ireland-all ar mention Dublin-as the place of retreat of he defeated invaders. If, then, Irish, Danes, Welsh all united their forces to attack the English, it would be difficult to name any place are suitable for their purpose than the mouth the Dee or the Mersey. It was at Chester, ry to Thorpe's rendering of the A.-S. ronice, that at a later date King Edgar ceived the homage of six kings. The number tight according to William of Malmesry and Matthew of Westminster, and he was them rowed in his barge on the river e, while he himself took the helm, kings of a. Cumberland, the Scots, and the Welsh of the number. But this same William famesbury follows Roger of Wendover in ag that the invaders whose power was ed by Athelstan had come by way of the

, and historians have naturally, thereoked in Yorkshire and North Lincolnshire traces of Brunnanburh. If we venture to rather the probabilities of the case than thority of historians who lived three cenof more after the event, we shall find the est preserved on the banks of the Mersey, that in precisely the form which Brunnan? Brunenburh) would naturally assume in English-Bromborough. The village has

hame to a railway station on the line that from Birkenhead to Chester, and if the ent learned historian who occupies the ery of Chester will inquire of local anties, I believe he will find that there have fund traces of a great battle in that bourhood. All this occurred to my mind ten years ago when passing the Bromagh Station; but it seemed to me so exatly obvious (1) that Bromborough was the et Brunnanburh, (2) that this latter name not much longer lie concealed when the Tay was dragging it forward into the light,

and (3) that antiquaries and historians would at
once recognize the name as beyond question
identifying the place, that it appeared unneces-
sary to write on the subject. A paper, however,
that has recently been read before the Devon-
shire Association on a kindred topic, treating the
question as one to which even now no answer
can be given, compels me to break silence.
R. F. WEYMOUTH.

THE EARLDOM OF MAR.

THE remarkable measure which has just become law as "The Earldom of Mar Restitution Bill" has so much interest for the antiquary and constitutional historian, and still more for the student of peerage law, that it is deserving of special notice. What it does and how it does it are matters to be carefully studied, nor is it possible to grasp its meaning or its real bearing on the controversy it terminates without some knowledge of the history and developments of that long and fierce contention.

"Your lordship," wrote Lord Crawford, in one of those protests quoted in his great and masterly work The Earldom of Mar in Sunshine and in Shade," "will perceive how impossible it is for me to recognize the existence of two Earls of Mar......I am sorry that I cannot myself admit the possibility......It is impossible that the two dignities can co-exist." Lord Crawford gives in these words the key to the entire problem. Previous to the famous Mar Resolution of 1875 it had not entered into the mind of man that there was, could be, or ever had been, at one and the same time, more than one Earl, or one earldom, of Mar. This was the earldom figuring on what is known as the Union Roll, which after experiencing many vicissitudes, and being granted in turn to various holders, had (except while under attainder from 1715 to 1824) been held continuously by the house of Erskine from the days of Mary, Queen of Scots (1565). It is, we repeat, a fact admitted without dispute that this, the earldom on the Union Roll, the only earldom known to exist, was the dignity held by the late Earl of Mar and Kellie, who died in 1866. The only question in dispute concerning it was that of its rightful precedence, it being a tradition with its successive owners persistently to protest for a higher precedence than that assigned to it on the Union Roll, in virtue of what is known as "The Decreet of Ranking" of 1606.

It has long been matter of common knowledge that at the death of Lord Mar and Kellie (June 19th, 1866) his earldom of Mar was, in Lord Crawford's words, "assumed by Mr. Goodeve-Erskine [né Goodeve], sister's son and next of kin, or heir at law, to the deceased earl," as a dignity of medieval, or rather prehistoric, origin, descending to heirs of line; that it was subsequently claimed by the late earl's heir male, Lord Kellie, on the allegation," as Lord Crawford wrote, "that the earldom of Mar on the Union Roll was not the ancient dignity it had till then been supposed to be, but a new creation by Mary, Queen of Scots, in 1565

66

..descendible......to the heirs-male of the body of the patentee, and consequently to Lord Kellie himself"; that his claim was opposed by Mr. Goodeve-Erskine, who claimed to be already in possession of the dignity, and to appear accordingly as "Earl of Mar"; that the Lords refused to admit his possession, "acted on the view," in Lord Crawford's words, "that his assumption was without warrant," and ordered him, when appearing before them, to drop the title he had assumed; and that they decided in favour of Lord Kellie on both the questions at issue, which fact it will be as well to give in the words of Lord Crawford himself :

"The answers of the Committee for Privileges to the two questions formulated by Lord Kellie, as put to the Committee, may be presented in their simplest form thus :-The earldom of Mar which now exists by the Earl of Mar and Kellie who died in 1866, on the Roll of Scottish Peers, and which was held

[ocr errors]

was a new creation by Queen Mary, and not the restitution by her of an ancient dignity; and, 2, The new dignity created by Queen Mary was limited to heirs-male of the body, and not descendible to heirsgeneral. These answers are based, as I have fully recognized, on the traditional rules and principles of the House of Lords, adopted since 1762 and 1771." -Earldom of Mar, ii. 118.

These two "answers "they embodied in "the Mar Resolution" :-"The claimant......[1] hath made out his claim to the honour and dignity of Earl of Mar in the peerage of Scotland [2] created in 1565."

The decision of the Committee evoked a good deal of indignation. Had the matter been of interest merely to the rival claimants themselves, it would never, of course, have aroused such feeling, and would probably soon have been forgotten. But in the first place a grievous blow had been inflicted on patriotic pride. With Scotchmen it was an article of faith that there was no dignity in the English peerage to be compared for a moment, in point of antiquity, with their own earldom of Mar—an earldom, as was proclaimed by Mr. Goodeve - Erskine, which his ancestors had held for "6 a thousand years," and which was soberly asserted to have been "created before 1014,"-a claim, we fear, sufficiently amusing to any one who has the slightest acquaintance with history — and now it was decided, and that by Englishmen, to have been created no earlier than 1565. In the second place, the fundamental axiom on which the case had really turned was the famous doctrine laid down by Lord Mansfield in the Sutherland case, and recognized inter alios by Lord Cranworth in the Herries case (1858) as "a settled rule of law," being that of the presumption of law in favour of the heir-male. This doctrine, which the Scottish school have fervently opposed, was duly followed by the Committee, who accepted it as their "ruling principle." It is important to observe that the disagreement was thus fundamental, and that the Committee and their Scottish critics openly differed on first principles. Therefore, if their decision is objected to, it must imply the rejection of those first principles on which, by common consent, that decision was based.

Granting that Lord Crawford and his predecessors are right, and that "Lord Mansfield's law" is wrong, then, no doubt, the decisions of the Lords in this and other cases, based in any way upon that "law," have been given under a We would wrong presumption and in error. not, however, here enter into an academic inquiry on the subject or pronounce an opinion on the Mar decision one way or the other. view we would take is that of the law lords in the debate of 1877 :

The

"Both Lord Selborne and the Lord Chancellor laid it down as the indispensable basis of discussion that the decision of 1875 must be considered as final, right or wrong, and not to be questioned......This, Í may observe, was practically endorsing Lord Redesdale's opinion on the question of jurisdiction, and echoing his words, 'I do not enter into the question whether that decision was right or wrong; it was the decision of the House."-Earldom of Mar, ii. 188.

66

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

There seemed at first sight to be only two He and courses open to Mr. Goodeve Erskine. his supporters were at perfect liberty either (1) to reject the decision of the Committee as resolution erroneous both in law and fact" (or, as they more tersely put it, as a blunder "), or (2) to accept it honestly and frankly, and drop the title unfortunately assumed. But it was discovered that, by what has been happily described as an equivocation on the facts of the case," ,, it was possible to invent a via media.

[ocr errors]

There are, obviously enough, two questions, which it is vitally necessary to keep distinct : (1) Was the decision of the Committee right or wrong? (2) Accepting the decision of the Committee, what is its bearing on the question, and what its consequences? These two fused. questions, however, it will be seen, were conIt was resolved to accept the letter

« ZurückWeiter »