« ZurückWeiter »
It was not lent me, neither. King. Where did you find it then? Dia.
I found it not. King. If it were yours by none of all these ways, How could you give it him? Dia.
I never gave it him. Laf. This woman 's an easy glove, my lord; she goes off and on at pleasure.
King. This ring was mine, I gave it his first wife.
King. Take her away, I do not like her now;
I'll never tell you.
I'll put in bail, my liege.
Dia. Because he 's guilty, and he is not guilty;
[Pointing to LaF. King. She does abuse our ears; to prison with her. Dia. Good mother, fetch my bail.–Stay, royal sir;
[Exit Wid. The jeweller, that owes the ring, is sent for, And he shall surety me.
But for this lord,
customer -] i.e. a common woman. So, in Othello: “I marry
her!-what?- -a customer. Steevens. A He knows himself, &c.] the dialogue is too long, since the audience already knew the whole transaction; nor is there any reason for puzzling the King and playing with his passions; but it was much easier than to make a pathetical interview between Helen and her husband, her mother, and the King. Johnson.
Dead though she be, she feels her young one kick;
Re-enter Widow, with HELENA,
Is there no exorcists
No, my good lord;
Both, both; 0, pardon!
exorcist - ] This word is used, not very properly, for enchanter. Johnson.
Shakspeare invariably uses the word exorcist, to imply a person who can raise spirits, not in the usual sense of one that can lay them. So, Ligarius, in Julius Cæsar, says
“ Thou, like an exorcist, hast conjur'd up
“My mortified spirit.” And in The Second Part of Henry VI, where Bolingbroke is about to raise a spirit, he asks of Eleanor“Will your ladyship behold and hear our exorcisms.?”
M. Mason. Such was the common acceptation of the word in our author's time. So, Minshieu, in his Dict. 1617: “An Exorcist, or Conjurer."-So also,
“ To conjure or exorcise a spirit.”. The difference between a Conjurer, a Witch, and an Inchanter, according to that writer, is as follows:
“ The Conjurer seemeth by praiers and invocations of God's powerful names, to compell the Divell to say or doe what he commandeth him. The Witch dealeth rather by a friendly and voluntarie conference or agreement between him or her and the Divell or Familiar, to have his or her turne served, in lieu or stead of blood or other gift offered unto him, especially of his or her soulé :-And both these differ from Inchanters or Sorcerers, because the former two have personal conference with the Divell, and the other meddles but with medicines and ceremonial formes of words called charmes, without apparition.” Malone..
6 And are ---] The old copy reads-And is. Mr. Rowe made the emendation. Malone ::
Ber. If she, my liege, can make me know this clearly, I 'll love her dearly, ever, ever dearly.
Hel. If it appear not plain, and prove untrue,
Laf. Mine eyes smell onions, shall weep anon: Good Tom Drum, [to Par.] lend me a handkerchief: So, I thank thee: wait on me home, I'll make sport with thee: Let thy courtesies alone, they are scurvy ones.
King. Let us from point to point this story know,
7 The king's a beggar, now the play is done:] Though these lines are sufficiently intelligible in their obvious sense, yet per. haps there is some allusion to the old tale of The King and the Beggar, which was the subject of a ballad, and, as it should seem from the following lines in King Richard II, of some popular interlude also:
“Our scene is altered from a serious thing,
“And now chang'd to the beggar and the king." Malone. 8 Ours be your patience then, and yours our parts ;] The meaning is: Grant us then your patience; hear us without interruption. And take our parts; that is, support and defend us. Johnson.
9 This play has many delightful scenes, though not sufficiently probable, and some happy characters, though not new, nor pro. duced by any deep knowledge of human nature. Parolles is a boaster and a coward, such as has always been the sport of the stage, but perhaps never raised more laughter or contempt than in the hands of Sbakspeare.
I cannot reconcile my heart to Bertram ; a man noble without generosity, and young without truth; who marries Helen as a coward, and leaves her as a profligate : when she is dead by his unkindness, sneaks home to a second marriage, is accused by a woman whom he has wronged, defends himself by falsehood, and is dismissed to happiness.
The story of Bertram and Diana had been told before of Ma. riana and Angelo, and, to confess the truth, scarcely merited to be heard a second time. Johnson.
END OF VOL. V.
T. S. Manning, Printer, No. 143 N. Third Street,