 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary - 1932 - 322 Seiten
...the reverse" (pp. 8, 9). (Mr. Justice Holmes, Mr. Justice Brandeis, and Mr. Justice Stone dissented.) GEORGE VAN CAMP & SONS CO. V. AMERICAN CAN CO. (278 US 245. Decided January 2, 19^9) Suit to enjoin violation of section 2 of the Clayton Act (38 Stat. 730) proiibiting... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary - 1932 - 320 Seiten
...reverse" (pp. 8, 9). (Mr. Justice Holmes, Mr. Justice Brandeis, and Mr. Justice Stone dissented.) GEOROE VAN CAMP & SONS CO. V. AMERICAN CAN CO. (278 US 245. Decided January 2, 1929) Suit to enjoin violation of section 2 of the Clayton Act (38 Stat. 730) pro.hibiting... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court, John Chandler Bancroft Davis, Henry Putzel, Henry C. Lind, Frank D. Wagner - 1934 - 778 Seiten
...467 33 Utah Power & Light Co. v. Pfost, 286 US 165 22 Valdez v. United States, 244 US 432 107, 121 Van Camp & Sons Co. v. American Can Co., 278 US 245 529 Vandalia R. Co. v. Public Service Comm'n, 242" US 255 466 Vanderheyden v. Crandall, 2 Denio 9 367... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court, John Chandler Bancroft Davis, Henry Putzel, Henry C. Lind, Frank D. Wagner - 1934 - 790 Seiten
...467 33 Utah Power & Light Co. v. Pfost, 286 US. 165 22 Valdez v. United States, 244 US. 432 107, 121 Van Camp & Sons Co. v. American Can Co., 278 US. 245 529 Vandalia R. Co. v. Public Service Comm'n, 242 US. 255 466 Vanderheyden v. Crandall, 2 Denio 9 367... | |
 | United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary - 1935 - 256 Seiten
...distribution in price it affords a wide latitude for action. The United States Supreme Court, in the case of Van Camp <& Sons Co. v. American Can Co. (278 US 245), makes the act applicable to not only the seller and his competitors but likewise to the buyer and his... | |
 | Public Service Commission of Wisconsin - 1941 - 1016 Seiten
...relieving from the grasp of the statute some whom the legislature definitely meant to include. — Van Camp & Sons Co. v. American Can Co., 278 US 245, 253. See also State ex rel. Hei)l v. Hinkel, 139 Wis. 41; Schaut v. Joint School District, 191 Wis. 104;... | |
 | United States. Federal Trade Commission - 1962 - 1900 Seiten
...other finishes and fabrics to make them a "line of commerce" within the meaning of the Clayton Act. Cf. Van Camp & Sons Co. v. American Can Co., 278 US 245. Thus, the bounds of the relevant market for the purposes of this case are not coextensive with the... | |
 | United States. Tax Court - 1984 - 1120 Seiten
...but we must apply the law as it is written, not as petitioners believe it should have been written. George Van Camp & Sons Co. v. American Can Co., 278 US 245, 253 (1929);34 Warrensburg Board & Paper Corp. v. Commissioner, 77 TC 1107, 1110-1111 (1981); Eder v. Commissioner,... | |
| |
Van Camp & Sons Co. v. American Can Co., 278 US 245, 253, 49 S.Ct. 
